I'm new to /lit/ and I do not understand why Continental Philosophy is so unpopular here. Do people who post here study philosophy properly, or are they just low self-esteem wannabes who feel the need to denigrate a legitimate philosophical movement just to make themselves feel like they know philosophy?
>denigrate
is that like removing the niggers?
>>8175826
Wisdom > Word Games
because its just a bunch of circular arguments and personal opinions from snake oil salesmen
has no solid foundation like analytics does.
its basically facts vs opinions
>He's not a natural historian.
buuut u guize the continentals are aiming for the human condition not just hairsplitting like teh analyticz cant you seeee that??? its not just one person its everybody. THEYRE TALKING ABOOT FORM TALKING ABOOT CONTENT WERE TALKIN INTERRELATIONSHIPS HERE. WERE TALKIN ABOOT GOD THE DEVIL HEAVEN HELL. CANT YOU GUIZE GIT THAT THROO UR THICK FUCKING SKULLZ?
i like continental philosophy because it's fun to read, but then i have better taste than 99% of the people here
>>8175843
>analytics have solid foundations
weew
Analytical philosophy is a movement in it, but there is no such thing as continental philosophy, unless if by it we mean everything which isn't Russel/Wittgenstein/others like them.
>>8175826
The latter. Anyone who's well read in both knows that the distinction is a political one at best. Take for example cognitive science: it can be approached both from an Analytical point of view and from a Phenenological pov. Both are productive and they complement rather than exclude each other. But love of wisdom, which is what philosophy means rather than knowledge of wisdom or whatever people imagine it to be, requires that those who want to practice it must give up on being frustrated manchildren caught in their own power-enjoyment-thought recurrent production of dismissals (usually fallacious and reductionistic) that make them feel better about their reactive identity. It's easier said than done.
>>8175831
did he get beat up afterwards?
