Who's your favorite character in your favorite book?
Milo Minderbinder here
BIG
>>8170167
Such a pretty girl
Such a pretty butthole
>>8170167
Monkey face.
>>8170199
Bitch boy
>>8170167
I would like to do unwholesome things with this girl.
To answer your question, OP, the poet in A Canticle for Leibowtiz who acts like a prat for a lot of the book but ends up redeeming himself bydefending some refugees and dying of a shot to the stomach
Roger Mexico
>>8170167
To answer your question, not focusing on the pretty girl.
Um.
Either Alia or Jessica from Dune.
>>8170208
Money face! with which Anon hath filled in rage,
And in response this peasant called me "bitch boy,"
Thou art a fool of hatred, a crying baby;
I beat thee, through your shield of stench, with pride.
>>8170282
Money face is right, this girl is a babe
>>8170222
Hell yeah anon good taste
>>8170287
What would /lit/ say when I say I like that. The monkey face. And that I'm a racist but love dating non-whites?
For some reason I get really off when I see the physiognomy of a girl signifying her subhuman qualities.
>>8170281
post pic of her gaping asshole please
>>8170328
That you suffer from autism
>>8170336
How about leaving /lit/ for a while and reading a book?
Rev. Gwyon
>>8170341
>>8170345
I just wish my browser would filter you.
>>8170359
Why not reply to the op? And stay on topic, friendo?
>>8170171
THICC
>>8170167
Mmm. She's got an adam's apple the size of my balls.
>>8170167
>pic related
why does /lit/ seemingly have a god tier taste in women
>>8170651
>he thinks it's a women
Oedipa Maas
>>8170656
Her name is Karina and she is indeed, a woman
![ddb23e137af8961866086d82a5f12011[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/V7mJVfA.png "ddb23e137af8961866086d82a5f12011[1].png")
pic related :3
also bernard from the waves
>>8170891
>man face
>dark eyes
>sideburns
>posing for her tumblr blog holding a cig
dropped
>>8170167
Looks like everyone had a share of her.
>>8170167
The ingenious hidalgo Don Quijote of La Mancha
Bruno Littlemore from The Evolution of Bruno Littlemore
>>8170891
Where'd her tits go?
>>8170167
did she forget to put on her pants?
>>8171785
>not smoking
>>8172556
You don't know what a dress is?
>>8172559
>smoking solely for that johnny depp aesthetic and ''edge'' to add to ur already contrived online persona
Dropped family
Link to her page anyway?
Her body is legit 9/10.
>>8170891
wtf
Did she lose like 100 lbs? She's still attractive though, but you know, those tits...
>>8172657
You just fell for the push up bra ruse brother but fear not for there are many like you
>>8172677
It's also that you can't see her thick legs.
I love girls
>>8172692
They don't love you doe.
>>8170167
Father Fyodor.
>>8172701
Well, I got a girlfriend
>>8172710
You a dyke? I think so.
>>8172710
She's not plural. And I doubt she loves you.
>>8172726
ok
whats the bitches instagram or w.e bruh?
>>8172726
>she has two hands
Do you have two sets of genitals?
>literature
>>8172749
yes. 7 actually
>>8172756
Yuck. Self-euthanize plox.
>>8170167
Not my favorite book but definitely Yossarian from Catch-22
>>8172776
lewd
>>8172776
>mfw she's mexican
>mfw she's also a vapid attention whore
Carlo Marx
>>8170167
Willi the Disk from Naked Lunch
Nice choice OP. I enjoyed the way he fucked everyone over. Clever S.O.B., him and many of the character in that book is why I found Catch-double-deuce so incredibly brilliant.
Try Dickens' "Bleak House", I think you'd like Harold Skimpole as well.
Also, why not post a picture of something relevant rather than a random chick?
>>8173318
I wanted to get the thread some attention, turns out it got a bit detailed
>>8172776
aww, that's dissapointing
>>8173345
What's the point of calling someone's appearance disappointing when the appearance of all the men here are disappointing. Everyone's disappointing.
Francie Nolan.
>>8170167
Ivan from the brothers k
>>8173353
No one expects the men here too look good and there for our looks aren't disappointing. Moron.
>>8170167
Ignatius Reilly. A bit strange since I don't read books like Confederacy of Dunces but I was laughing my ass off the entire time.
>>8173380
So you have hypocritical unrealistic expectations of other people?
>>8173353
>the appearance of all the men here are disappointing.
>implying things and stuff again
top 1, tumbl
the girl is attractive physically but that's all
contrived internet persona and populist agenda is enough to make me wish i was into men
>>8173386
>hypocritical unrealistic expectations
yes, i watch porn on mute because of this
silence is sexy
>>8173341
>a bit
Kek, I know that feel
>>8173386
I don't know what's unrealistic of expecting (in a predictive, not moral sense) that someone will look as good as a photograph of themself.
>>8173389
>contrived internet persona and populist agenda is enough to make me wish i was into men
Cool. Irrelevant, but appreciate anecdote.
>>8173404
>I don't know what's unrealistic of expecting (in a predictive, not moral sense) that someone will look as good as a photograph of themself.
Think of why it may be.
>>8173409
>>(in a predictive, not moral sense)
Did you pay attention to this part? I should have put scarequotes around moral btw, it was just for a lack of a better word.
>>8173409
it wasn't irrelevant though, bruv!
she is a nice looking vase, wanting to be perceived as cultured and intellectual but is lacking all that's required
it doesn't matter anyway because thanks to the net and her physical appearance, she could finger paint with shit and some born sucker will call it revolutionary...
with instagram ''artists'' it's always the same
>>8172753
this desu
>>8173453
>wanting to be perceived as cultured and intellectual but is lacking all that's required
Doctor, Doctor, come here quick. I feel he has an injection of projection.
>>8173459
>Projection
If you say so, leg beard.
Also, please stop shilling for this cunt because you fancy her, you rug-munching cunt.
And stop derailing threads, god man.
>>8173475
I shave my legs fine.
>Also, please stop shilling for this cunt because you fancy her, you rug-munching cunt.
I am not shilling her because I fancy her, I am shilling her because the petulance and hypocrisy of chauvinism annoys me. Power play belongs on /d/.
I think she looks great in her instagram pics.
Her tits appear to be "enhanced" in OP's pic, but I'm more into those legs and ass anyway.
>>8173482
>I shave my legs fine
tits for the lads wen?
>I am shilling her because the petulance and hypocrisy of chauvinism annoys me.
you're not a lesbian at all, an angered bisexual at best. trust me
>>8173494
Yeah physically she's hot as fuck but that gets boring fast to be quite honest with you senpai ily
>>8173516
>you're not a lesbian at all, an angered bisexual at best. trust me
You're not a man at all, an angered boy at best. Trust me.
>>8173516
Fuck off.
One more
>>8173516
>Yeah physically she's hot as fuck but that gets boring fast to be quite honest with you senpai ily
If only you had the physicality to counter balance your boredom.
rhoda in the waves
>>8173494
You boys don't have much use or experience for the purposes of strong thick and muscular legs. At least not directly.
Yo
>>8173519
>>8173520
>>8173521
>>8173539
>You're not a man at all
>An angered boy
>If only you had the physicality
>You boys
>Don't have much use or experience for the purposes of strong thick and muscular legs
JustEmasculateMyGenderUp.png
Chill out being so dyke like, god damn.
Every women is straight or bisexual, let us speak only in truths babe.
Lesbians are like dragons... They don't exist.
How's that for chauvinism?
>Mfw i genuinely unironically believe this and it's worked out for me
>>8173576
>and it's worked out for me
Well that's a convincing reason for why you'd be right.
>>8173576
There's intimacy in women that's otherwise not there in men. Mutual understanding not there. The love feels differently, and better.
whoops i accidentally just answered op's question, i should have read the thread turns out
>>8173586
If you dressed me up as a girl while I halfheartedly pretended to struggle, would I become better?
>>8173593
Thank god that didn't derail our conversation about some girl on instagram.
>>8173597
It involves the difference of work required to work the junk. Not really. I'm flattered though.
>>8173581
>Well that's a convincing reason
Hundreds of thousands of years of men and women reproducing as nature intended and then, all of a sudden, le modern era hits, along come smartphones and the attention deficit and it's ''men are pigs, I'm just attracted to women, I was born this way #dykes4life''
>>8173586
>There's intimacy in women that's otherwise not there in men.
So you are bisexual then. I was right all along.
>Mutual understanding not there.
Probably so, yeah.
>The love feels differently, and better.
Tits when? Pls don't be a legbeard.
>>8173601
Oh well, the thread was trash anyway. The Instagram girl is hot also
>>8173616
#dykes4life
lmfao
>>8173616
>le homosexuality was invented recently meme
Saphism is a very modern phenomenon
>>8173640
>sapho wasn't bi
>>8173647
She was, but the term Saphism means something different.
>>8173628
It was probably already a hashtag anyway. I can't take credit.
>>8173636
I'm not saying it was ''invented'' recently. Only that it became so popular all of a sudden, and it's just interesting to watch (literally)
People have been fucking each other (men or women, w.e) since the dawn of time, probably.
For some reason though, mate, I have a feeling that there were less ''lesbians'' when women relied on men to procure food and shelter or face certain death. Similarly, even IF there were genuine lesbians (as opposed to just bisexuals, which is my belief), I doubt they were the ''man-hating'' beasts like they are today.
>>8173692
>it became so popular all of a sudden
>>8173692
>the ''man-hating'' beasts like they are today
How do you surf the internet from the 70s?
>>8173692
>it became so popular all of a sudden
(¬‿¬)
>>8173697
>>8173702
It did though my bisexual mateys
I could provide source but I genuinely can't be arsed to do so, so yeah. Stay in wonderland, believe what you wanna believe, let me see how far your butthole goes
>>8173701
>How do you surf the internet from the 70s?
Implying you won't be thinking the way I think now, only 20-25 years later. You're way behind and you don't even know it.
scribble
>>8173725
>I could provide source but I genuinely can't be arsed to do so, so yeah
Convincing once again.
>my bisexual mateys
I'm straight.
>Implying you won't be thinking the way I think now
Completely missing the point.
>>8173725
>I could provide source but I genuinely can't be arsed to do so, so yeah
You're talking to a gay girl who hangs around gay girls and you're suggesting you have accurate for sources as to how we work?
Maybe, I know this is totally terrible to believe, totally...degenerate....too gross.....
I'm getting ahead of myself, maybe some people don't like men sexually, and they've always been around. And it doesn't effect you at all. It's a shock to the system, I'm sure.
>>8173741
>you're suggesting you have accurate for sources as to how we work?
I'm suggesting there are relevant studies, etc, yes.
>I know this is totally terrible to believe
I was waiting for you to come at me with this angle to be honest senpai, but I'm literally years ahead.
>maybe some people don't like men sexually, and they've always been around.
There self-destructive-to-the-human-race genes would have been decimated millennia ago baby
>>8173739
>I'm straight.
If you were freezing to death and the only option for survival was sex with someone the same gender, you would become bisexual in a split second compadre.
That's the only thing internet feminists were ever right about, the gender fluidity thing. Well, partly right anyway.
>''And here I thought you were a dumb brute. I could have forgiven a dumb brute!''
>>8173795
>If you were freezing to death and the only option for survival was sex with someone the same gender, you would become bisexual in a split second compadre.
No. I would just fuck someone I wasn't attracted to.
>>8173795
>I'm suggesting there are relevant studies, etc, yes.
Really? There are relevant studies why lesbians don't exist! Damn, I'd love to read them.
>but I'm literally years ahead.
I'm sure you are years ahead about lesbians than a lesbian.
>There self-destructive-to-the-human-race genes would have been decimated millennia ago baby
Did you mean their, or there?
>>8173797
You'd become attracted, bro. You'd be more erect than you've ever been in your life, no homo.
>>8173802
>There are relevant studies why lesbians don't exist! >Damn, I'd love to read them
Well those are not the titles for obvious reasons but ye
>I'm sure you are years ahead about lesbians than a lesbian.
''Maybe, I know this is totally terrible to believe, totally...degenerate....too gross.....''
>Did you mean their, or there?
Don't be so gay, you know what I mean't. Meant'd. Mean. Whatever.
>>8173823
>Well those are not the titles for obvious reasons but ye
I didn't ask for the titles you fucking idiot, I asked for the sources.
>>8173823
>You'd become attracted, bro
You still suck at making arguments.
>>8173834
>Find them yourself. They exist. That's all you info you need.
No, I didn't ask to find them myself, you said they exist, meaning you read them. Find the academic sources that says lesbians don't exist, do it, or admit you're a fucking goober.
>>8173834
Trust me bro you're a space lizard.
>>8173837
No. I'm not trying to upset your entire life. I'm just cutting my teeth. Why don't you find out for yourself?
>>8173839
Far out man
>>8173871
>No.
>Why don't you find out for yourself?
Again, you fucking enormous buffoon. If you read sources that say lesbians don't exist, it should be easy to find. Do it.
Do it.
>>8173876
>You fucking enormous buffoon
Everyone on 4chan is a buffoon by definition tbqh. That's why we come here.
>If you read sources that say lesbians don't exist
Well they obviously would never say that per se because that would be obvious career suicide for any academic now, wouldn't it?
Stop triggering me.
>>8173891
Is being a buffoon even a bad? It sounds like a very Pynchonian adjective to be.
>>8173891
>Well they obviously would never say that per se because that would be obvious career suicide for any academic now, wouldn't it?
If you read sources that say lesbians don't exist, it should be easy to find. Do it. Titles do not matter, substance does.
>>8170167
Milo is also the mayor of Malta if I'm not mistaken =]
>>8173972
Yep, among many others
