Do you read Wikipedia articles to get an overview when you're about to read something complex?
I trust 40 random people writing an article for me as much as I trust 40 random people making me a sandwich.
That being said if you follow the citations is a great place to get sources for facts.
Anyone who doesnt is a pretentious idiot
>>8132141
controlled by cultural marxists intent to breed out whiteness
Honestly it's totally fine for most things, but if you're forming an opinion from information don't use it. If you're using it to read a summary of a position or a piece of writing and then take part in discussions on them then you need a good course of chemotherapy.
>>8132141
Wikipedia editor of seven years with >1000 articles here. Ask me anything.
>>8132635
pathetic
Before: https://archive.today/YzkIS
After: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
It's trash.
External links and references > rest of the article
>>8132635
What kind of stuff do you edit usually?
I have ~60 edits, should I create my profile page with all that gay info about me (languages I speak, for example)?
I hate it, when wikipedia says i have done goofed with modifying the articles, when i honestly have never done anything in them.
I really cant undestand how my ip has anything to do with that.
CIA has definitely used Operation Mockingbird-style editing of information.
>>8132670
Noticing a pattern here? They don't even pretend to be remotely objective.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_genocide_conspiracy_theory
