Hey /lit/, I figure you guys might be interested in my work.... Here's the first part of a large story I've begun assembling for my senior year of high school here, though it's almost over and this is all I have to show for it, nobody from school has done anything with the copies I've presented and given so far. What are your thoughts?
http://wittymoniker.com/parrotism/sermons/pdf/danman.pdf
>114 pages
I will read one page and come back, it better be good you piece of shit
>>8076793
>a large story I've begun assembling for my senior year of high school
>for my senior year of high school
No.
>>8076809
Ok I'm back, sounds like juvenile shit. The 'audio' shit at the beginning is copy pasted from V.
>>8076823
it's not an assgn. though
>>8076831
this isn't helpful, because it isn't true and doesn't detail anything from the actual text
>>8076850
I don't care. It's still juvenilia. Come back in 6-10 years.
>>8076860
I don't care either, turd punk, I could still kick your ass IRL.
>>8076877
Stop being juvenile
it's trite and YAish
and juvenile
What the fuck is this shit?
>forcing the tungsten filament in the bulb of the lamp to eject radially energy in a wavelength which agreeably oscillates at its own tungsten filament-specific frequencies depending on the situation of the electron ejecting it
If you're going to go for le ebin reductionism hurr durr the least you could do is have the faintest idea what the fuck you're talking about.
The thing about INCANDESCENT lightbulbs is that the filament INCANDESCES. Frequency is continuous, is not quantized, and does not depend on the fucking material. It is a thermal phenomenon.
Unless you were trying for unreliable narrator, in which case you went about five hundred meters too far.
>>8076987
btfo
>>8076987
Papa Pinecone, is that you? Tell me more about Byron the Bulb.
>>8076987
my text entirely agrees with your assertion, it's just worded differently. i am referring to a range of unit light frequencies specific to incandescing tungsten. said it, incandesing, is that better?
nice graph though, i believe yall are too critical
its really, really, really, really, really, REALLY, really, really, REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, really, REALLY, really, really, REALLY, really, really, really, REALLY, really, really, REALLY bad
>>8076793
shut the fuck up, stop writing, you're terrible.
>>8080032
>http://wittymoniker.com/parrotism/sermons/pdf/danman.pdf