>finally read Hegel
>think all is well
>notice that I suddenly think everything needs a dialectical synthesis
>every time I encounter a problem I just look at its elements and think "yup, this situation is still lacking its dialectical synthesis"
>tfw Hegel turned me into a fucking retard
>>8059954
>everything needs a dialectical synthesis
When I pointed out that Hegel uses dialectics I was called out for not having read Hegel. Fucking pseuds.
>>8059962
Ironically they're the pseuds for incorrectly regurgitating the "I'm so much smarter than you" trivia that Fichte is the one who actually said the thesis-antithesis thing.
ideas dont lack for a synthesis, they simply continue along trajectories until they meet their antithesis
>>8059969
> he fell for the thesis antithesis meme
In Hegel, the term Aufhebung has the apparently contradictory implications of both preserving and changing, and eventually advancement (the German verb aufheben means "to cancel", "to keep" and "to pick up"). The tension between these senses suits what Hegel is trying to talk about. In sublation, a term or concept is both preserved and changed through its dialectical interplay with another term or concept. Sublation is the motor by which the dialectic functions.
Sublation can be seen at work at the most basic level of Hegel's system of logic. The two concepts Being and Nothing are each both preserved and changed through sublation in the concept Becoming. Similarly, determinateness, or quality, and magnitude, or quantity, are each both preserved and sublated in the concept measure.
>>8059954
>claiming to read hegel
>unironically using the word synthesis
wew lad
Hegel dialectic is a proto systems theory. Discuss.
>>8060066
I would rather discuss those great double dubs
>>8060055
This tbhqh, he abhorred the term.
>>8060066
I see something interesting. Elaborate... Do you mean a la Wiener and Luhmann?
>>8060295
Hegel would have abhorred your sycophancy as well.
>muh dialectic
what the fuck is hegel even on about
>>8059954
The less you share Hegel's personality the harder he is to read. The first three chapters are meant to be read while feeling absolutely terrified. Each chapter after those three are gradually less terrifying.
>>8059962
Master Slave dialectic is not important.
>>8060399
>muh law of non-contradiction
>>8060404
First three chapters of what book?
>>8059954
dialectics is not a synthesizing, nor a synthetic, technique, method, or skill. it's an objective fact of the uunfolding of history, as is your illiteracy. fuck off.
>>8060505
pride and prejudice. the phenomenology you abysmal retard.
>>8060512
Not OP. OP never implied it was a technique or skill.
>>8060384
Hegel wouldve loved these dubs, fukken chekem
>>8059954
Don't feel bad. Hegel turned a lot of people into fucking retards
>>8060643
haha yeah, like Feuerbach and Tillich, am i right
>>8059954
>every time I encounter a problem I just look at its elements and think "yup, this situation is still lacking its dialectical synthesis"
>tfw Hegel turned me into a fucking retard
>If I were to say that the so-called philosophy of this fellow Hegel is a colossal piece of mystification which will yet provide posterity with an inexhaustible theme for laughter at our times, that it is a pseudo-philosophy paralyzing all mental powers, stifling all real thinking, and, by the most outrageous misuse of language, putting in its place the hollowest, most senseless, thoughtless, and, as is confirmed by its success, most stupefying verbiage, I should be quite right.
>>8060707
dialectically synthesise this...
*unzips penis*
>>8060729
this is the banter I come to lit for
>>8060729
hegel porno would be a godsend
>oh baby let's create a synthesis inside my belly
>>8060820
>""banter""
Hello reggit
>>8060518
I kek'd pretty hard.
>>8061230
Got u covered senpai
>>8060547
leldork
>>8060707
is schopenhauer even self aware?
>>8061325
Hegel looks like he thought this was only a fashion photo shoot until the door slammed behind him and Heidegger began opening his shirt.
>>8061297
uh oh, do they say that word?
