>start with le greeks
>when you're done with that go forward in time, reading random philosophers as you go along
>skip kant as well as anyone you disagree with
>probably best to skip the entirety of eastern philosophy as well tbqhfam
>once you get to stirner philosophy is over and there is nothing left to learn
>kill self
>>8048442
Nope start with stirner end with stirner then kill self
>>8048474
thanks, i'll try it out
>>8048442
>skip kant
????????
>>8048442
Start with foucault, then fanon, debord, baudrillard, zizek.
Then kill yourself.
>>8048442
>skip anyone you disagree with
Yeah, because philosophy's just a bunch of ~opinions~ right?
The only actual correct intellectual progression is this.
greeks -> bible/church fathers/desert fathers -> scholastics -> contemporary voices and envoys and theologians of the catholic church.
>>8048752
This.
>>8048531
Go to hell, heathen.
>>8048442
End with Cioran
>>8048752
What do you think of the current pope? Seems kinda like a lefty, huh?
>>8048752
Contemporary recs please
>>8048752
You forgot the part where you kill yourself. Very important, especially in a list like this.
It's not worth it unless you intend on becoming formally educated in thee subject.
>>8048442
read schopenhauer then either
a) achieve enlightenment (you wont need philosophy anymore) or
b) kill self
>>8048442
>>8048752
>>8048769
Is it worth studying philosophy formally at university?
I have the money and little else to do while waiting to apply for grad schools next cycle.
>>8048442
You should read Aristotle and Plato, then move on whatever you like. The Greek are the beginning of everything, all the other philosophers are already specific and thus, non-mandatory.
