Good literature can have elements of erotica. If you mean erotica as in genre fiction then no. Genre fiction can't be considered good relative to anything outside of its genre.

nice calabash, data.

>>7873981
I mean a book where the main selling point is the sex. You read that book fully expecting that you may fap to it at some point.

>>7873974
>what is Tropic of Cancer.

>genre fiction
>good

>>7873981
Tldr

Good lit can be erotic.

Erotica isn't literature.

These are defined terms with distinct meanings.

do you think you can define erotica?

i wrote a novel that had no overt sex in it at all, just a lot of teasing. i guess that isn't good literature either.

>>7873990
This.
When the utter pondering of literary exposure of a book gives to its readers is a swollen phallus and a tiny little happy lake of unborn children, it might not obtain the title of good literature since on its nature it's not meant to exert the literary art, but to exert the dick

>>7873991
4chan

Yeah read Georges Bataille's story of the eye

>>7875088
where to go with bastille after story of the eye? i just finished it recently and need more.

>>7875375
I'd honestly say 100 Years of Solitude borders on Erotica. I felt pretty moved (in my dick) by a good portion of the book.