is Pushkin better than Dostoyevski?
pushkin's prose fiction is horrible. his plays are okay. his poetry (barring onegin) is good.
no but he is better than tolstoy
>>7842732
>>>barring onegin
Fuck off pleb
>>7842732
>pushkin's prose fiction is horrible.
How the fuck do you come to this conclusion? I don't understand how you can read Pushkin and deem it horrible. What have you read of his stories?
>>7842745
But Tolstoy is everything good and loving about the world
>>7842778
Tolstoy is pleb-tier
no.
>>7842732
Anglo detected
>>7842808
Babby's intermediate literary opinion
Everyone follows the same stages of opinions about Tolstoy
>wow this story is great
>eh he's no Dostoevsky
>fuck I get it now
Read more Russian lit pleb
>>7843312
>not understanding the fourth step is that Tolstoy was a Western transplant and Dostoevsky is the true Russian prophet
Tolstoy is a European intellectual pretending to be a religious serf
Nobody on /lit/ ever talks about Rusland and Lyudmila, which is just the funniest shit.
I don't think the Dost v Pushk q is answerable, they're apples and oranges and from different eras. Dost build on Pushk's legacy and shit. It's like asking who's better out of Shakespeare and Eliot.
>>7843492
>It's like asking who's better out of Shakespeare and Eliot.
But this is so fucking obvious
>>7843511
But it's just moot. Like why would you compare things from different eras, different media, styles, aims, conventions?
And to clarify I mean George not TS
>>7843321
>pretending
No pretending in Anna Karenina m8
>true prophet
>Dostoevsky
Looks like you misspelled Pushkin B)
how different is saudi arabic from egyptian arabic? is it like british english and american english? or like mandarin and shanghaiese?
