These replicant mimetic creatures are almost undetectable. – “Thanatos mimics the anthropomorphic desiring-cycle — anticipating, enveloping, and simulating it — but it is on its way somewhere else. Because thanatropic replicants are dissimulated as erotic reproducers, they initially appear as traitors to their species, especially when the shamanic xenopulsions programming their sexuality are detected. Nothing panics the reproducers more traumatically than the discovery that erotic contact camouflages cyberrevolutionary infiltration, running matrix communications channels across interlocked skin sectors.” (Machinic Desire, p. 7) – Nick Land
As we become One with our Other. As Man melds with machine to become cyborg—as man merges with animal/insect to become something anthropomorphic (think Kafka’s Metamorphosis or Beatrix Potter)—and as these anthropomorphic cyborgs meld with Others like themselves, we become more immanent and holistic in perspective, a disORGANized Deleuzian system where we are becoming Animal.
The question is: Did D&G, in their philosophy, predict the future coming of Furry culture? Is the Furry culture the Becoming-Animal?
>>7841225
It was just a generation of children confused by disney.
you absolute memelord.
Mmmmm... No. I don't think so. I'm trying to think of an example, but to start, consider how every major culture in the world has stories (dating millenia B.C.) about people becoming animals, and vice versa.
Yet the objective relationships between animals have been applied to certain subjective relations between man and animal, from the standpoint of a collective imagination or a faculty of social understanding… The animal is inseparable from a series exhibiting the double aspect of progression-regression, in which each term plays the role of a possible transformer of the libido (metamorphosis). – Deleuze & Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus
Furry sex?
>>7841280
what does time period have to do with anything? are you saying the modern-day man can't Become-Animal? Why can't this anthropomorphic merger happen today, especially on a rhizomatic node-structure like the internet for instance?
i'm sorry but those guys write like shit
>>7841225
Sure, why not. They can be taken to predict the manifestation/transformation of aberrant sexualities by the deterritorializing-reterritorializing process of the internet in general. Furries, traps, SJWs, reactionaries, each of these subcultures are strongly associated with their own definitive attitudes on sexuality which obviously influences their sociopolitical outlook, and vice versa.
>>7841299
shut your whore mouth
>>7841225
>These replicant mimetic creatures are almost undetectable. – “Thanatos mimics the anthropomorphic desiring-cycle — anticipating, enveloping, and simulating it — but it is on its way somewhere else. Because thanatropic replicants are dissimulated as erotic reproducers, they initially appear as traitors to their species, especially when the shamanic xenopulsions programming their sexuality are detected. Nothing panics the reproducers more traumatically than the discovery that erotic contact camouflages cyberrevolutionary infiltration, running matrix communications channels across interlocked skin sectors.” (Machinic Desire, p. 7) – Nick Land
this is basically why furries and transgenders are so hated
>>7841297
Internet rhizome + layers of simulacrum pertaining to Becoming-Animal = furry libido
>tfw you're actually discussing the site on which you are posting
>meta feels.
>>7841483
"Transgender" is not a noun.
Those furries are clearly fascist desiring-machines. They aren't BwO caliber yet.
>>7841225
>as man merges with animal/insect to become something anthropomorphic
Lycanthropy is primarily a furry process.
>>7841225
>As we become One with our Other.
the horror! the horror!
