With the exception of Borges (debatable) Argentina has no discernible talent

>>7822759
>(debatable)
you serious mate

>>7822742

Latin America has great literature, and it is beating both Spain and Portugal for quite some time now.

You don’t have even read anything of that part of the world and yet somehow find yourself in the position to call a lot of material “shit”.

>>7823125
Borges has not even one serious work

>>7822759
>With the exception of Borges (debatable) Argentina has no discernible talent

Says the guy who has read only Borges

>>7823148
>one serious work

What is a serious work in your judgment?

>>7822759
>Borges
>Roberto Arlt
>Manuel Puig
>Juan Jose Saer
>Juan Gelman
>Julio Cortisol
should I mention more?

>>7823171
Surely not a bunch of shit poetry, some child story compilation and essays

>>7823181
Sub par shit comparable with the worst 'known' western authors

>>7823187


You have not answered the question. I would like to know what you look for in a book, what makes a book great in your opinion. It is not an unjust question, for you are criticizing a very respected and celebrated writer, so I guess you might explain us why you don’t like him.

And I have not even made a more serious question: what writers do you consider great?

>>7823195

How do you know? you have not read them.

OP confirmed fraud

>>7822742

/pol/tard trying to hide in a somewhat /lit/ modeled thread