>>7808435
We shouldn't.

File: thanks j.jpg (69 KB, 504x470) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 504x470

>a farewell to arms above to the lighthouse

>yfw the OP of that thread literally chose 92 through 100
we should have more than 3 votes next time to avoid this shit

>>7808660
i'd say make a top 50 or even top 25. books with less than 5 votes shouldn't even make the list. also the votes should be ordered and weighted accordingly

>>7808435
That one was made in October-November, so not until Autumn.
>>7808684
I don't understand how that would make it better, or different for that matter except that the chart would be smaller. You can choose to only pay attention to a select portion of the list if you want.

>>7808730
it would prevent troll submissions - half the list has 5 votes or less. also, even though IJ got the most votes, other books could have been #1 if users could order their lists and so on.

>>7808901
I remember the voting, there were very few obvious troll entries and I don't think any ended up making the chart. I'm not a big IJ fan, but it got a lot of legitimate votes and even if half this board hates it the other half loves it. Even if you could order votes, it would likely still end up on top.

>>7808684
If you wanted more votes on some of them just let every person have 5 votes...

When the Polling Anon sets it up again in the fall.

>>7808435
2015
None of the books are from 2015

At the end of the fucking year you autistic fucking faggot. Have you even seen a fucking yearly list created at the fucking start of the year?

Jesus Christ fucking kill yourself.

>>7810562
Somebody get this hothead outta here

>>7810562
>implying a book published in 2016 will make the list