If you've read his four other major works why the fuck would you even have to ask?

>>7801368
i was going to post this.

>>7801350
Yes, without a doubt. Its actually my second favorite of his.

No, it's by far the worst of what you listed.

>>7801368

Obviously I enjoy him, was wondering if this was anything new because i don't know if I need to read another Bible sized book if I've already seen this movie before, feel me?

>>7801417
>feel me
niglet pls

I'll also say yes Demons is definitely worth reading. In my opinion it's more essential than The Idiot and Notes from Underground. Skip the translation in the OP pic though in favor of one of these:
* David Magarshack (titled The Devils)
* Michael Katz (titled Devils)
* Robert Maguire

>>7801417

Demons is different from the rest of Dostoyevsky's work in how political it is. He definitely included some political material in other works, but it's very much the essence of this one. Dostoyevsky went through a total transformation between his earlier years and later in life, and this book is a major result. A big part of the book is Dostoyevsky's response to Turgenev (there was great animosity between the two) and his Fathers and Sons.