>>7669381
>Female author that isnt Plath, Atwood, Dickinson, Bronte, or Austen

I would recommend another book discussion site, like Goodreads or perhaps le Reddit

It's good but the central conflict is shit. Ill.post a more detailed response when not on mobile.


Someone tell me if the sequel is good

Was it rape?

>>7669387
Shit taste.

Oh man, it's been on my to-read list since forever, this reminder bumped it up. The story reminds me a bit of Book of Strange New Things

>>7669381
>dude, space rape lmao, but let me first tell you some barely related shit for hundreds of pages

plot spoilers

You just sent people to make contact with aliens on an alien planet for the first time in history, and the only survivor ends up being prosecuted and assumed guilty even though no one knew what actually happened? instead of, you know, trying to figure out what happened, you decide the best thing to do is to put the guy through like a criminal trial or w\e the fuck they were doing? And the only reason is because he was seen in a sexually compromised position/was obviously deranged when he killed the child? That seems highly unrealistic/asinine to me.

>>7671293
The guy wasn't really forthcoming in explaining himself. I'm sure they may have given him the benefit of the doubt at first, but once he turned into an edgelord and accepted the blame for it, or tried to blame God, there wasn't any reason to trust him.

Luckily they realized he was heavily damaged psychologically, but still it is hard not to accept the testimony given by the guy himself, and just assume the worst.

Personally, this book wasn't the least bit enjoyable to me. I didn't go on to read the sequel, but I've heard it redeems it a bit. There are some good critical reviews on GoodReads that point out some of its weaknesses.