Post yours. Let's see what kind of people are attracted to literature.
>Research suggests that the same five-factor structure of personality can be found in multiple other countries, based on a translated version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Over the past decade, studies on the validity of the Five-Factor Model using translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory have found broad support across many different studies and in many different countries; in earlier studies, Extraversion and Neuroticism were reported as stable personality scales across several cultures, including German, Dutch, French, Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino samples
>Further research found support for the entire Five-Factor Model in Chinese, Dutch, Italian, Hungarian, German, Australian, South African, Canadian, Finnish, Polish, Portuguese, Israeli, Korean, Japanese, and Filipino samples, in addition to other samples. Across multiple studies, factor analyses of translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory in languages from different language families consistently load on five factors that largely correspond to the Big Five personality traits. Additionally, the Big Five traits have been found in the personality ratings of observers in over 50 cultures, indicating that the previous findings were not dependent merely on ratings of the self. Overall, this body of work has established the validity of the Five-Factor model cross-culturally, potentially providing evidence for the Five-Factor Model as a universal taxonomy of personality structure
>/lit/ is for the discussion of literature
>>7428100
yes and? this is a discussion about people who read literature
I'm an edgelord
>>7428097
Nice try NSA.
>>7428130
we already know of your pedophilic leanings, do you think we need this stupid test to know everything about you?
I just don't know how to answer these questions...
>tfw closed-minded
>used to have relatively high open mindedness on similar questionnaires.
Sucks getting old and being depressed
>>7428171
isn't it common to get more closed minded as you get older?
>>7428178
Yeah, I don't consider it a bad thing, but them equating it with "intellect" in the test irked me.
Though -- I smoke a lot of pot for the anxiety, so usually when I'm around others I'm a lot less high strung.
>>7428186
something like "inquisitiveness" would be better IMO
I mean the hippie on a roadtrip, trying out every drug imaginable and having gay sex all over would be pretty high in "open to new experiences" but if you have any experience with people like that, you'd know they aren't "complex" or "creative" except for a few exceptions
>>7428097
>personality test with right/wrong answers
>>7428196
>right/wrong answers
where? I don't see them
>>7428198
It's in the descriptors of the dimensions.
It's clearly better to be Open, Conscientious, Extroverted, Calm, and Agreeable.
>>7428205
I'm trying to find a webpage that had improved descripions on the big five but no luck
anyway the point it had was that someone who's "calm, agreeable and extroverted" is not always someone fun to be around, he can be a wishy-washy doormat
similarly someone with very high "calm" can be someone who simply doesn't give a fuck or suffers from bad anhedonia or detachment
someone with high conscentiousness can be an anal-retentive bureaucrat
high agreeableness means unassertiveness, lack of confidence
etc. there's two sides to both
>Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
Christ, tell me how you really feel.
damn... son...
>>7428223
I start a lot of stuff but finish almost nothing
I'm always missing deadlines
disorganized I disagree with, my method of organization looks disorganized but is anything but. I know where everything is and I can tell you the logic behind everything I do
>>7428195
Exactly my thoughts.
I don't see what whether or not I want to go to 3rd world countries to do drugs and fuck brown people has to do with my intellect.
>>7428205
>Everyone should be the same.
LOL
>>7428097
That color scheme gives me seizures. Fuck your tests.
>>7428195
it's almost as if personality models and other self help crap are complete bullshit
>>7428327
99% of them are
big five isn't though, it's pretty consistent across cultures
and it has nothing to do with self help
but it doesn't tell you much because >>7428215
it's just an inventory of preferences and thinking styles
the more descriptive a personality model gets, the more full of shit it usually is(see MBTI)
Is there a single person who believes in this HR-tier psychology bullshit?
