Hey /lit/, let's make a list of pedo/hebe writers. I'd like to read writers with my own tastes.
I start with:
>Lewis Carroll (he must be, you just need to read "Alice". There are things that normal-fags wouldn't understand or feel).
>Vladimir Nabokov (come on, we all know it)
>Edgar Allan Poe (he married his 13 year old cousin, Virginia Eliza Clemm, when he was 26, and lied about her age on the marriage certificate.)
>Ann Frank
>>7258451
John Ruskin I believe wouldn't fuck his wife because he realized that past the age of about 9 women start growing hair and menstruating
>>7258451
>>Edgar Allan Poe (he married his 13 year old cousin, Virginia Eliza Clemm, when he was 26, and lied about her age on the marriage certificate.)
He wasn't really a pedo though, He was just being Southern.
>>7258650
Damn, he never consummated his marriage...
Does this count?
>>7258451
No Thomas Mann ?
>>7258489
Gee Anne, it would be a shame if someone reported you to the Gestapo.
Now pull off those panties and let me see you piss.
>>7258889
Death in Venice?
>>7258901
Yes, even if it doesn't represent his feelings, it's still the cliché of pedoliterature.
>>7258907
Even if I was searching for books about little girls, I'll remember it. Thanks.
>>7258451
>Lolita
>A sympathetic portrayal of a pedo
If I unironically liked young girls I would be shivering with rage at the end of it.
>>7258878
Probably just let her take it by other guys. It's the only fair thing to do, the cuck.
>>7258915
Also, Ginsburg OP.
>>7258915
>unironically liked young girls
Kek
>>7258451
>>Lewis Carroll
What the fuck
>>7258930
sources on lewis carroll?
>>7258940
Aren't his photos self-explanatory ?
>>7258915
I nearly cried with the end, mate.
>>7258940
Not him, but you should investigate about Carroll's hobbie of taking photos of little girls (also, there are new pics of nude little girls attributed to him).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/bbc/11368772/BBC-investigates-whether-Lewis-Carroll-was-repressed-paedophile-after-nude-photo-discovery.html
>>7258920
Could you explain a bit more? Maybe a complete name?
>>7258930
Ada or Ardor too. When you like little girls, and don't care about morals, incest becomes a stupid taboo.
A possible pedo might be Tarjei Vesaas. Check "The ice palace" (and the movie of the same name).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hr0rYtams0w
(there are some really nice nude little girls)
>>7258953
Not poster, but allen ginsberg was a huge advocate of NAMBLA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
This thread is pedobear-approved.
Also, I don't know where, but I've heard that Hans Christian Andersen was a pedo too. Does somebody know if it's true?
>>7258966
well he looks like one so that's proof enough for me
>>7258967
It's because of his jew nose?
>>7258972
yeah that thing was ginormous, reached from one end of the block to the other, probably a fucking pedometer in length
I should have known this board would be full of pedos, what with all the religion nuts.
I think people with religion are really just projecting their irreconcilable paraphilias onto others by claiming universal sinfulness.
>>7259007
Do you really think that we believe in religions, Mr. Bond?
>>7258958
>advocate
https://youtu.be/IuRLGdGnqSU?t=50s
>>7259010
>The laser will sever your penis, unless you can suppress your boner
If you expect to arouse me, you have to try harder.
>>7258957
hmm
>>7259014
Little girls aren't enough for you?
>>7258888
quads for the holy grail
>>7258878
Yeah, and he got cucked by Dante Gabriel Rossetti (who also cucked William Morris).
>>7259050
They might if they tried harder.
>>7259145
Rossetti was p based
I wonder if he went for the swinburne boipuss
more likely they just acted as wingmen and were partners in cuckoldry, fucking and cucking everywhere they went
>>7258961
this is 4chan, what the fuck did you expect?
I wish I could be a cute little girl ;_;
>>7259334
Are you a man or a woman? I ask because that's creepy in the first case, but really hot in the latter.
>>7259345
odd that the gender matters.
>>7259348
me. i wouldn't want to be the object of you disgusting neckbeards' fantasy, or even worse, actions.
>>7259351
>2015
>Judging by stereotypes
>>7258451
>>7258926
>>7258930
>>7258940
>>7258946
>>7258953
LEWIS CARROL ISN'T A PEDOPHILE, I WROTE AN HONORS THESIS THAT INCLUDED HIM AND I SERIOUSLY LOOKED INTO THIS
The nude photos are nudes, not pornography. They were done with the permission of the parents and locked away so the girls wouldn't be embarrassed. All child nudity being pornography is anachronism. There were plenty of child nudes being painted at the time. The camera was an interesting novelty at the time, seen sort of like shitty painting. Lewis Carrol idolized children for their purity and simplicity, and so did many of his contemporaries. This is often called the "cult of innocence." Sexualizing children would be heinous to Carrol, it would foul them. Look to the Alice books, they're about a little girl navigating an absurd, defamiliarized version of adulthood with simple politeness and pleasentness.
Really look into it and don't pay attention to the BBC et al with their sensationalized view of them.
Somebody said that JD Salinger was because of "A Perfect Day for Bananafish." I never finished reading that though, so can't confirm
>>7259368
I call bullshit. Established interpretations are established for a reason.
>>7259368
THe man is dead he needsnt a lawyer
>>7259376
In the historical and literary work, it isn't established. Carrol is guilty in only the court of public opinion.
>>7259371
>"A Perfect Day for Bananafish." I never finished reading that though
huh?
>>7259368
Huh. Sounds like a typical lolifag though tbh
>>7259381
In what way? You say that 'the cult of innocence' is ignored, where can I read more about it?
>>7259383
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Perfect_Day_for_Bananafish
>>7259394
I know what it is, but it's a very short story, how could you not finish itNine Stories is my second favorite collection from him tbh. Very nice.
For anyone looking for pedo/hebe novels, check out The Belvedere Field. It isn't a great book (certainly not literary fiction), but it is the only proper love story between an adult man and a preteenaged girl that I've come across.It's well worth reading for the first half. Confirmation by Gianni Segre is also good.
>>7259371
I would agree that Salinger was a pedophile.
>>7259393
>http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/lewis-carrolls-shifting-reputation-9432378/?all
seems like a legit source but https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ is a documentary that's equally convincing. How would you respond to the documentaries points?
>>7259345
I'm a man and forty-three. Age gives you perspective, pal.
>>7259407
>For anyone looking for pedo/hebe novels, check out The Belvedere Field.
Thank you for the info. Does it feel realistic?
>>7259393
>> article on the smithsonian
>> article split over 4 pages to get dat ad revenue
>> article deliberatly hides it's evidence behind clickbait till the third page.
fuck that. How about you defend your claims yourself?
>>7259393
"Annie’s lovely form and face"
unexplained problems with the object of his obsession's family
perpetual bachelor
"References to him hugging and kissing girls"
mmmmmmk sure
>>7259438
It feels a lot more realistic than Confirmation (the characters are more multidimensional (the girl in the book really does behave like a child) and real), and it has a balance of love and sex.They have sex a fair bit if I remember correctly.
>>7259470
I see... Any pdf link out there? English is not my first language, but I might give it a try.
>>7259490
Can't help you there. You could always buy it.
André Gide, specifically L'Immoraliste
>>7259687
Straight pedophilia only pls
bump
>>7258451
This thread is disturbing
Garcia Marquez should be added to the list (Memories of my Melancholy Whores, Of Love and Other Demons)
Has anyone else read this? I've never seen anyone mention it before.
>>7259368
>I WROTE AN HONORS THESIS THAT INCLUDED HIM AND I SERIOUSLY LOOKED INTO THIS
oh wow, an honors thesis! I guess that solves everything then. World-class essayist here has clearly ended the notion permanently
>>7259756
fuck off faggot
>>7259368
m8, there's no way you found anyone to cite to back that thesis. he took pictures of girls past the age of consent which did not fall into the cult of innocence dynamic and it would have been clear to anyone in the era the 14 year old was an adult engaging in public nudity.
>>7259614
Thank you anyway, mate.
>>7259889
Hania?
>>7259902
Damn, you're right. Maybe "One Hundred Years of Solitude"?
>>7259931
Added to my personal list, thanks!
>>7260051
Yes indeed. <3 Hania
>>7260086
yes, because posting pictures of dead children is much more representative of a healthy mind!
>>7260086
disgusting, why do you have a pic like that saved in your pc?
So... this is the current list of (possible) writers of pedo books:
>Straight:
John Ruskin
Lewis Carroll
Vladimir Nabokov
Edgar Allan Poe
Hans Christian Andersen?
Tarjei Vesaas?
Gianni Segre?
Anthony Nobbs (The Belvedere Field)
Bonnie Nadzam (Lamb)
>Gay:
Allen Ginsberg
Thomas Mann
André Gide (The Immoralist)
>>7260067
Nice taste.
>>7260086
Damn, how can you live saving pics of dead kids? Do you masturbate to that?
Thomas Pynchon?
thread
delete
thread
delete
Kill this thread with fire, nuke it from orbit, whatever but just destroy it !!!
>>7260158
>people in power have killed innocents so pedophilia is ok and also it's somehow your fault
powerful argument
What a great thread with my fellow anons. We are the anonymous legion, right? Please keep posting gentlemen, nothing going on here, certainly not any IP logging by government agencies.
>>7258451
I can't believe I wrote a paper about this board. Fuck all of you guys.
>>7260158
Don't post when you don't have any knowledge of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Your view on American foreign policy is also naive as fuck. Don't bring your stupid politics into this thread please
This thread is what happens when /b/ and /lit/ meet.
Now kill that eltdrich abomination !!!
>>7260117
Andersen's mostly bi forever alone, I think
Ruskin isn't a pedo, the story about pubic hair is apocryphal and he fucked a lot of whores
Add Beauvoir and Sartre, especially their letters to each other.
>>7260200
That's your own fault you fucking retard.
>>7260206
!!1!!!1!!
Me
>>7260227
No, Beauvoir liked girls
>>7260233
dubs can lie sometimes
>>7260233
you're acting like it's 100% sexual. that's just ignorant.
>>7260233
If you cant appreciate the beauty of children then I would say that's a personal problem, pedo or not you should see the attraction.
>>7260248
I totally agree with this.
jesus christ this board is fucked
>>7260282
which board is not fucked?
>>7260287
none of them but my god this is a new low.
>>7260292
forreals. i've never seen it so blatant. this board needs jesus.
>>7258896
lmao
>>7260305
i'd rather have repressed pedos tearing themselves apart internally rather than ones that trot it out in the open on /lit/ and act like there's nothing wrong with it.
so for once, yeah I'd say this board needs fucking jesus.
>>7258889
you're retarded
>>7260233
You are way off the mark with your post here. Besides the physical attraction (little girls are more aesthetically appealing than women), I find their personalities much more attractive too. It is their innocence and joy for life that makes them partly so appealing. Women are boring.
>>7260314
>muh feelings
You heretic
>>7260314
Yes, or at least have them get off this fucking board. Mods, can you please ban these fucks? this whole thread is barely, barely related to literature.
>>7260305
Nah, better pedos than christfags tbqh
>>7260321
They're children, you realize that right? Their personalities haven't even formed yet, and if you fuck them you do irreparable damage to their psyche. It's a pretty heinous fucking crime.
>All these moralfags
Mods, ban anyone who thinks that we should censor everything before 1980s female writers, they're trying to kill literature. Thnx
Ausonius swung both ways but mostly towards teenagers
>Collige, virgo, rosas, dum flos novus et nova pubes
>et memor esto aevum sic properare tuum.
Srsly though, no Wilde? He was tried for corruption of a minor ffs
Ginsberg joined NAMBLA
Burroughs and Byron fucked a lot of boy pussy but that was kind of the feature of a lot of grand tours so we might as well say The Greeks/Flaubert
ITT: dried up old hags getting mad at beautiful young girls
>>7260335
I never argued in favor of having sex with children. I am primarily attracted to little girls; I find them sexy and beautiful but that doesn't mean I would have sex with one (unless there was a situation where she was perfectly willing). In fact I am in favor of keeping sexual relations between adults and children legal. There is certainly nothing heinous about posting innocent pictures of cute little girls on this board and discussing what is purely fantasy.
>>7260388
>mfw frequently jerk off to the memory of fooling around with a 12 year old girl when I was 13 or 14
it was amazing. their bodies are literally perfect
>>7260397
>doesn't want a thread about fucking children in literature on a literature board
>thinks this wouldn't censor important parts of canon
you're retarded and illiterate so who you want to fuck is irrelevant because you should be sterilized for the sake of future library patrons
>>7260388
it's impossible for them to be perfectly willing, because they don't understand what the act is, how it will fuck them up in life. If a banker said he was going to give a 9 year old a million dollar loan with 20% interest, would it be okay because the 9 year old was "perfectly willing"?
>>7260416
sure, it's not termed, the kid doesn't have to pay back the interest ever, legally speaking. kid would be dumb financially speaking to not take that, it's practically a gift with a better tax profile. guess you don't read much
>>7260423
fine you dumbass, let's say laws weren't in place that protected the kid.
>>7260370
Not him, but... how many kids you've met? It all depends of the education that they receive. Out there are lovely kids, with more common sense than lots of adults. Kids that respect you if you treat them with the same respect they deserve. But what do you expect when you expose them 24/7 to political correctness, Disney serials, and the contempt of adults who fear to hurt their underage "property"...?
Kids aren't stupid, as many people believe. They're just less experienced (they have had less obstacles in their lifes). And despite of this, they have their own criterion. Don't judge kids for their adolescent phase (all these hormones transform them in a different person).
Believe me when I say that kids under 10 have sexual interests. It's in our nature. I don't mind how long you guys try to deny it.
>>7260427
your analogy would still be retarded because the point is it doesn't invoke any law which would protect the lender. seriously, get an of age advocate to read and sign any legal documentation for you until your reading level improves. also, leave
>>7260416
Children are interested in and can enjoy sex just like adults. The trauma from consensual relationships with children comes from the stigma attached to it; children are taught that if they have that experience that it's wrong and they've been used, regardless how they felt about it at the time. It's entirely possible that a child could have a consensual relationship with an adult man, but it would have to be one with mutual affection and trust on the child's part. I wouldn't advocate using a child for sexual gratification. I am only interested in having a romantic-sexual relationship with a little girl. But I realize that is unlikely, and most likely pure fantasy.
>>7260434
>Believe me when I say that kids under 10 have sexual interests. It's in our nature. I don't mind how long you guys try to deny it.
Then how did I not have any sexual interests until puberty? (Inb4 freud-tier psychoanalysis)
>>7260463
>And they respect being treated well because they are yet to understand facades, back stabbing, intentions, their moods are yet to be complex and accordingly act to what is done to them.
I can't agree with that. Of course they understand things like back stabbing. They can do that, they can lie... It's related to what I said before about education. If their parents lie and cheat, that's what they learn. Also, the most aggresive kids i've met are those who have problems with their parents.
>>7260471
What I said is not a rule. Depends on a lot of facts. If you're interested, I started developing sexual feelings around 7yo.
>>7260489
What does the end of your post even mean?
Also I don't see how we are disagreeing on anything here. I have already said I'm in favor of keeping child sex illegal.
>>7260462
I wish I could reach through this post and strangle you.
>>7260510
you shouldn't be left near children
The real tragedy is that Woman/boy love is the purest, most tender form of affection there is.
>>7259371
Who the fuck was a loli in that dreadful Bananafish story?
>>7260508
cruel picture. I was listening to jazz. stared at her with such a vague expression. felt like a distant dream, of some world not this. god im sad
but why isn't this thread deleted already?
>>7258451
Do you guys know of any books about pedophilia from the female perspective, specifically female pedos?
I ask for purely academic reasons.
>>7260117
Often the argument against distribution CP is a fundamentally anti-capitalist one where distribution of existing cheese pizza necessitates more demand for it but I know many of you guys are staunch communists here so what is the ideal policy on CP in your vision of a communist utopia?
>>7260533
>>7260524
Because everybody here secretly enjoy little girls look, hair smell, cute voices...
>>7260495
>What I said is not a rule.
So, why did you even bring that up in the first place?
>>7260510
You sound like a violent bigot m8
>>7260540
Damn what a cover
>>7260542
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSSLQf95-Nc
>>7260538
CP is the rebuttal against piracy in intellectual property. If creative works are stolen there's no impetus to create new works.
>>7260538
Its wrong, you fucking moron. Would you want a bunch of dudes wanking off to your 5yo gaping asshole?
>>7260522
Read it again dumbass
>>7260564
Now why would I subject myself to that?
>hurrdurr, I'm a psychopath with the mind of a child, let me tell you about my lolsorandom fish story
>>7260233
3dpd tbh
>>7260576
Thats pretty accurate actually
>>7260596
>supposed to be
you can be attracted to whatever you want, fam
>>7260341
>>7260233
i imagine this formed some of the impetus for lolita
>>7260538
Before the illegalisation headed by the USA, CP was like any other pornography. There is a market, and people paid for it. Nobody made a big deal.
It's similar to what happens with strong religions countries. Porn is forbidden "because it's bad and wrong", and you can't discuss that, because you'll become a bad person in the eyes of the society.
>>7260579
>but you overestimate highly on how much they can know being such little age.
Maybe it's you who underestimate them. Not having the proper tools (words) doesn't mean that they don't think/feel it.
Out there are scientific studies that prove that there's no real problem with kids having sex with adults, but if you talk about it, you'll be fucked and exiled. What do you expect of our times, when Nobel prizes must retract their own words because the truth can "offend" stupid people?
>>7260546
It's just fantasies ;) why can't I fantasize about stabbing you in the kidneys and curb stomping you outside your moms house? :) I'm not hurting anyone
>>7260610
Well I think having a market for it is wrong but in a centrally controlled economic system maybe it is best to let previously produced stuff be watched to prevent more serious things from happening
>>7260579
I had to google to find what "snek" is. Apparently it is a reddit meme.
My point was that child sex is not wrong because it is harmful, it is harmful because it is wrong. I agree there is good reason for the stigma; children's innocence should be protected, and part of that innocence is ignorance of sex.
>>7260596
Unconventionally attractive but I'm pretty fond of that picture.
>>7260406
I never said I wanted this thread on the board you fucking cuck. I said I have a problem with people fucking children. You bitch about reading comprehension when you have none, fucking kill yourself.
>>7260646
>children's innocence should be protected
For us, "innocence" is wonderful, and something to save. But honestly, it's just unexperience combined with expression incapacity. Is this kind of behaviour (innocence protection) so applauded nowadays, what hurt kids.
How do I know this? Once I've been a kid.
>>7260687
>I said I have a problem with people fucking children.
The problem is yours. Let the others live in peace.
>>7260646
>it is a reddit meme.
it started as a screencap of an indian woman on facebook, and it's been on 4chan, tumblr and reddit fam
>>7260706
It's literally effecting the lives of my friends and family, why would I let people wantonly fuck children and scar them for life?
>>7260617
post it tbh
>>7260706
Protecting innocence is in fact the most important reason child sex is shunned in our society, but that's a conversation for another time, I'm going to bed.
>>7260722
I don't know why you think your friends are more relevant than literature, but I do like how you're using their supposed pain to try to win an argument on a literature board. One of us :D
>>7260734
Test
>>7260722
>fuck children and scar them for life
I'd need some proofs for that affirmation.
>>7260730
Me too. Good night.
Nice conversation, guys.
>>7260734
Wait, I just realized I mistyped that last post. It was supposed to say "I never said I didn't waant this thread on the board you fucking cuck. I said I have a problem with people fucking children. You bitch about reading comprehension when you have none, fucking kill yourself."
Sorry for the confusion, but I'd still like it if you promptly blew your brains out you smug pile of human garbage.
>>7260741
>The existing literature on the long-term sequelae of child sexual abuse is reviewed. The evidence suggests that sexual abuse is an important problem with serious long-term sequelae; but the specific effects of sexual abuse, independent of force, threat of force, or such family variables as parental psychopathology, are still to be clarified. Adult women with a history of childhood sexual abuse show greater evidence of sexual disturbance or dysfunction, homosexual experiences in adolescence or adulthood, depression, and are more likely than nonabused women to be revictimized. Anxiety, fear, and suicidal ideas and behavior have also been associated with a history of childhood sexual abuse but force and threat of force may be a necessary concomitant. As yet, there is insufficient evidence to confirm a relation between a history of childhood sexual abuse and a postsexual abuse syndrome and multiple or borderline personality disorder. Male victims of child sexual abuse show disturbed adult sexual functioning. The relation between age of onset of abuse and outcome is still equivocal. Greater long-term harm is associated with abuse involving a father or stepfather and abuse involving penetration. Longer duration is associated with greater impact, and the use of force or threat of force is associated with greater harm.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014521349290011F
Stop fucking pretending that children aren't hurt by this shit you fucking moron.
>>7260744
>telling rape victims to blow their brains out because rape victims you're friends with are important
>on a literature board
>while getting the quote chain wrong
now i think you're three kinds of dangerous idiot. the one that's relevant is that you think any of this opinion piece is about books. hell, i've been raped and i can still tell you're not here to talk about literature, maybe it didn't scramble my brains enough for this to be a fair exchange. not getting raped obviously did you some damage
It is pretty interesting though, is it not, pedophilia.
>>7260617
You can tho. You will just sound like 14 yo shota boipussy ripe for pounding by doing so
>>7260755
>Longer duration is associated with greater impact, and the use of force or threat of force is associated with greater harm.
You're talking about rape, mate. I'm talking about consensual relationships.
>>7260617
lmao were on 4chan what do you expect, take your silly fantasies elsewhere, i'd say the same to them but atleast they arent talking about curb stomping people. thread shoulda been removed.
>>7260755
>relationships formed on a basis of fear, pain, and an inherent inequality of power produce within the lesser psychopathology
I don't think that was what he was talking about.
>>7260788
you're worse than the people who want sci-fi threads removed because >genre fiction
>>7260400
tfw I have a 19 yo qtpi gf that weighs 88 lbs and is exactly the body type you are talking about :^)
>>7260816
>I don't know how to quote
>it's your fault
So I heard you can't triforce?
>>7260809
((((((>_<))))))
>>7260051
>"One Hundred Years of Solitude"
Pooir Remedios. She deserved a happy life with his husband.
>>7260117
the immoralist was lame. he didnt even do anything with kids. its was like 3 pages out of the entire book he even hinted towards liking little arab boys
>>7260540
>alissa nutting
Can someone sauce me who this qt cunny is?
>>7260152
Came here to post this. Didn't read any of his works but I heard about controversial chapters involving pedophilia
Does anyone else use redundant pleonasms to make themselves sound smart?
>>7258676
what a failure of a joke kek
>>7259012
underrated
>>7260388
>Perfectly willing
Just because the other assents, it doesn't absolve you morally.
This thread would have probably be dead by now if not for moralfag outcry. fucking moralfags
>>7260388
>Packaging
>In fact I am in favor of keeping sexual relations between adults and children legal.
>Packaging
Posting pictures of children in a sexualizing context is, in fact, heinous.
If you, plural, actually cared for children, as individuals, or as an idealized group, you would use your "mature" knowledge and experience to nurture and protect them.
Rather than creating the typical pornographic objectified stereotype of the mindless, adoring, incarnation of your own desirability and gratification.
Get your head out of your ass.
>>7261537
we do nurture and protect you, sweetie. we don't even point out when you don't talk about books in case it hurts your childish ego to be cancer.
>>7261550
You can push your head up as far as it can go, it doesn't make your child-fucking fantasies literary, nor non-malignant.
there is nothing wrong with being a pedo
>>7261612
Actually, several books by Nabokov do make them literary. You being enraged isn't going to eradicate a rich history of pederasty from Western Canon. Go be pissed off about reality elsewhere.
>>7261284
It does if your imaginary moral spooks allow you to have sex with children given that they assent. But nothing is intrinsically moral or immoral so it doesn't matter.
>>7261624
>When you can only defend it anonymously, online, through obviously constructed charicatures, it is inherently and obviously healthy.
>>7261630
If you read your fantasies into Nabokov and use Lolita or Ada to idealize them as being serious and "literary", you are not only deluded, you are a poor reader.
Colette
esp Claudine at School
>>7261654
Most of Nabokov's works contain literary descriptions of hebephilic fantasies. What the fuck are you talking about? Nabokov's practically the definition of literary in those fantasy scenes.
>>7261670
>Reducing literature as pornography to feel validated.
Come back when you grow up.
>>7261683
m8 it's like you're having a seizure or something. Nabokov is intentionally, painstakingly literary to make it not make it simple pornography. Saying that Nabokov isn't "literary" or serious is more wrong than fucking children. You're wrong and you can learn to deal with it; it's part of growing up.
>>7261690
>make it not* simple pornography
sorry
>>7261690
Because clearly I was claiming Nabokov wasn't literary, as opposed to you being obviously incapable of reading him?
But hey, if you can't parse a two-sentence post, he's clearly in good company.
>>7261711
Kid, have you ever thought the reason you need to prove so badly you're so against pedophilia existing anywhere in literature despite a whole list of examples might point to something slightly off about your personality? I mean, besides being emotionally retarded around Lolita's age.
>>7261722
>half the thread is "moralfags" bitching
You hypocritical voyeurists are worse than the fucking pedophiles, and could use some self awareness. You nigs act like this shit is shocking.
>>7261722
>The mature reader is not only the ablest of irresistible child-fuckers, he is the glorious vanquisher of even the least worthy imaginary foe.
I thought you were discussing actual literature, with arguments and insights, since, as you know me so well, from a mere couple of sentences, you must have some actual insight into Nabokov to share with us all?
Rather than just being sick and in denial.
>>7260610
>Out there are scientific studies that prove that there's no real problem with kids having sex with adults,
source?
>>7258451
Mohammad.
>>7259933
More inclined to believe someone who actually spend time doing research. Unlike 99% of journalists.
>it's on 4chan?? Must be true! Run with it
>>7262210
Mohammed was illiterate you fucking idiot.
>>7262258
>you have to write your book with your hands
You are the idiot.
>>7262382
Oh come on, that's just grasping at straws. He couldn't read or write. Name me some authors that can't read and/or write yet managed to write books that aren't completely shit.
>>7262390
You are being autistic mate. If he didn't who wrote the quran?
>>7262397
In Islam, it is said that Mohammed was told wait to write by God, and since Mohammed couldn't read or write he told his most trusted followers/friends what to write and they just wrote it down. That's why he's the Prophet known as the 'Messenger', all he did was deliver messages from God to the humans, no magical supernatural shit like Jesus and Moses.
>>7262405
*was told what to write. Not wait to write. Fucked that up.
>>7262405
Yeah i know all of these i used to be a muslim but are you really bringing this as an argument?
>>7262410
Well, yeah. I've never heard of an author who couldn't read or write, so if Mohammed couldn't read or write then he isn't the author of the Quran. In fact, no human is the author of the Quran, god is. So yeah.
>>7262413
>muslim logic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Dede_Korkut
>>7262415
What I am I looking for here.
>>7262418
A book written by an illiterate person.
Most of ancient epics and stories were told by illiterate people and written centuries later.
It is not rocket science.
>>7261858
For example...
>In their study “A Meta-Analytic Review of Findings from National Samples on Psychological Correlates of Child Sexual Abuse,” Rind and Tromovitch (1998) came to the following conclusion:
> “CSA [child sexual abuse ] is not associated with pervasive harm and that harm, when it occurs, is not typically intense.”
>This peer reviewed article appeared in the most prestigious psychological journal in the US.
https://www.ipce.info/library_3/rbt/metaana.htm
>>7258451
/lit/ I need your help.
there is this book, but I don't remember the title...
was written by a anglophone woman in late 1800, start 1900.
protagonist is a man, that with a ship has to reach his girlfriend/future wife.
almost all the story is placed on the ship
during the travel he found a young bully girl that with her gang
he falls for the bully and is uncertain, at the end of the jurney, if go to his loyal girlfriend or run away with younger girl
>>7262783
Probably not, but might it be related to this?
>>7262811
no.
additional info. I've found the wiki to that book in a thread like this 2 years ago
>>7259368
So he was /c/instead of /l/, that's just different kinds of pesos tbh
>>7258888
>mfw I see my uni library has a translated copy
>>7263370
You can't be serious! /lit/ searched for a copy to scan for a long time!! Will you be our hero?
>>7263468
Possibly, looks short enough. I'll start a thread if there's no /pedolit/ up
>>7261745
You could use some self awareness when on a literature board you try to claim that Nabokov isn't writing literary hebe fantasies. You'll get called out on that shit based on literary theory and nobody will care about your moral posturing.
>>7261753
The insight is that if you want to claim that Nabokov isn't literary, you'll look like you're below the reading level required for his prose.
>>7263523
We really thank you, mate. I'll be waiting.
test
>>7265363
upvoted
>>7263523
>/pedolit/
The illegitimate child of /lit/ and /b/
OP here. I add the Wikipedia info of the section called "Pedophilia in literature". IT's not about pedo writers, but about pedo related literary works.
>The 120 Days of Sodom (Marquis de Sade)
>Acid Row (Minette Walters)
>Avoidance (Michael Lowenthal)
>Demons (Fyodor Dostoyevsky)
>Dream Children (A. N. Wilson)
>The End of Alice (A. M. Homes)
>Gravity's Rainbow (Thomas Pynchon)
>The Great Mirror of Male Love (Ihara Saikaku)
>Hannibal (Thomas Harris)
>Hogg (Samuel R. Delany)
>International Journal of Greek Love
>Justine (Marquis de Sade)
>Little Children (Tom Perrotta)
>Lolita (Vladimir Nabokov)
>Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons (Tom O'Carroll)
>Paedophilia: The Radical Case (Tom O'Carroll)
>Tampa (Alissa Nutting)
>Teardrops on My Drum (Jack Robinson)
The Deadly Space Between, Patricia Duncker [straight]
>thread which openly supports pedophilia
>lasts for several days
>thread which slightly supports right-wing ideals
>deleted after ten minutes
>>7265512
Because pedophilia is not wrong, unlike right-wing ideals.
>>7265512
>he thinks nabokov wasn't right wing
uwotm8 he was fuxcking nobility
>>7265526
>tfw right-wing and a pedophile
>>7265547
It's ok, mate. We don't hate like pedophobes do.
a girl who has no breast is not interesting
>post innocuous thread tangentially related to literature
>get banned
>post thread where pedos can share their spank banks and get huffy about others having the audacity to think fucking little girls is wrong
>234 replies, 67 posters
I hate this site so fucking much.
>>7265899
this thread is literally literature related
>>7265922
fuck you pedoshit
>>7266242
hehehe
So... OP here. This is a very basic version of what I have in mind. With some collaboration, we'll make it bigger, guys.
>>7268327
Holy shit just fuck off
>>7268327
Nabokov also has an early novella The Enchanterpedo panics and get caughtStill straight.
Lewis Carroll doesn't have kid fucking in the books so I don't know if that matters.
Other suggestions in thread which have kiddie fucking, with good and bad endings for them:
>>7265499
>>7265484
^mix of straight and gay and not all are fiction
>>7261658
^straight and gay, from 15 y/o perspective
>>7261005
>>7260540
^straight female adult male child
>>7260383
^mostly gay
>>7260227
Beauvoir's L'invitee (gay, based on their relationship with two sisters) or Sartre and Beauvoir's letters
Should we consider Fanny Hill or other education of a prostitute books?
Is Lost Girls /lit/ or /aco/?
Anais Nin has some pedo porn in Delta of Venus
>>7258451
>(he must be, you just need to read "Alice". There are things that normal-fags wouldn't understand or feel).
lol that and all of his child models were nekkid
>>7268443
>Lost Girls
>Lost Girls is a graphic novel depicting the sexually explicit adventures of three important female fictional characters of the late 19th and early 20th century: Alice from Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, Dorothy Gale from L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz, and Wendy Darling from J.M. Barrie's Peter Pan. They meet as adults in 1913 and describe and share some of their erotic adventures with each other. The story is written by Alan Moore and drawn by Melinda Gebbie.
wow
>>7268556
It's a beautiful book, imitates the style of artists from the era in a meta-book within the narrative. Recommend it highly if possession won't get you imprisoned
>>7259422
when suddenly it is 2007
>>7259658
kill yourself
You moralfags realize no one here is actually committing the act right? So why the fuck are you getting all butthurt
>>7268577
Probably because they want the same, but can't.
You're all stupid and ugly. All of you.
>>7258901
Isn't pederasty pretty well established as its own separate thing?
>>7268556
That sounds like a wild ride.
