Daily reminder that if you're being censored and denied speech it's because you're not falling in line of the accepted speech (as determined by our overlords) fast enough. Wonderful example of victim blaming and circular logic right here from the left.
>private business exercises right to refuse service to specific people
>alt-right pissbabies throw temper tantrum
Hmm...
>>6432241
If you think private websites should be required to "respect freedom of speech", it means YOU YOURSELF DO NOT RESPECT FREEDOM OF SPEECH. If you demand others to offer a platform for your speech, then you yourself are demanding they restrict their freedom of speech.
>>6432621
so me demanding a greater freedom of speech is... restricting the freedom of speech of people that want lower freedom of speech on some or all parts of the board?
Great logic there, mate.
>>6432241
>this thread
>>6432630
Oh, so you actually just don't understand freedom of speech as a concept.
>>6432643
But fascism does work. It's for 3 out of 3 on making countries powerful and rich that were previously poor, humiliated and impoverished.
Oh, and fuck globalism to death.
>>6432653
So you're a rabidly pro-freedom of speech fascist sympathizer? Alright. Have fun on summer break.
>>6432653
>But fascism does work.
>All fascist nations were destroyed
lol, get a load of this guy
>>6432667
>>All fascist nations were destroyed
By other countries that were threatened by fascist nations. Need I remind you of the intellectual theft that occurred from 1945 to 1949 in occupied Germany where not only did all the scientists and engineers got shipped off to America and all the equipment and thousands of factories were dismantled and shipped off to the Soviet Union but the Allies made a law that gave companies and governments from Allied countries exclusive access to every and any new patent created in Germany during the occupation?
>>6432241
>from the left
I've posted many peaceful comments on multiple anti-trans videos, with facts, logic and well structured arguments,
only to have them deleted by the alt-right video creator
>>6432241
You seem salted desu
Are you a tranny?
>>6432241
Daily reminder that YouTube is a privately owned Web site. An entity can do whatever the fuck it wants with its own property.
If a group of tumblrinas marched en masse to your home and shouted anti-(whatever) slogans well into the AM hours, you would reserve every right to remove them from your property, by force if necessary. Are you just as guilty of censorship as YouTube, then? Is any such action suggestive of an epidemic of censorship? No, that's just how private property rights work.
Go suck /pol/'s proverbial dick some more.
