Could a LBGT nation ever exist in the near or far future?
>>5718847
I would personally do everything I can to try to destroy it
hell no
>>5718847
That's one of the most retarded ideas I've ever heard.
>>5718847
Hopefully, we need a nation to defend ourselves and adopted children from the threat of the breeders
>>5718847
>taking your sexuality as far as to make your own nation
this is why everyone hates us
>>5718847
>LGBT nation
It would be nuked by literally every country in the world.
>>5718870
>a chance to kill this many fags at once
Pls let this happen
>>5718847
But it alredy exists technically
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_and_Lesbian_Kingdom_of_the_Coral_Sea_Islands
>>5718880
You've got to be fucking kidding me
>>5718879
It would be more cost effective to nuke all of Africa and the Middle East.
>>5718890
I'm not, and you are technically a citizen of it. All hail Emperor Dale
>>5718880
kek
too bad they picked a shitty name for it
>>5718880
My sides.
I think The Nations of Key West and Palm Springs sounds good
>>5718847
No, because the birthrate would be the lowest in the world.
>>5718880
Well who's the king of this kingdom? I dunno if I want to be ruled over by a literal fag.
>>5724138
That's not the full name, though.
the full name is The Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands
imho they could have come up with something more original and still lgbt
>>5718847
We're more than our sexualities.
Even if there was one, bisexuals and trans people would still be treated like second class citizens by the fags. There would by uprisings, and the lesbians would be forced to choose sides. Anarchy would issue as the faggots tried to maintain their control.
tl;dr : It would be fucking hilarious
>>5720654
True, I imagine it would be more of a mecca situation rather than an actual nation, a gathering of fags rather than the reproduction of them (which is impossible, obviously)
I'm not advocating the idea btw, personally why I see a few upsides it would mostly be a negative thing, as I could imagine fags who don't want to live there being forcibly removed from their own countries, as well as segregating us from the rest of society.
I am however, interested in what people thought of the idea
>>5718847
No. They'd all die of AIDS within 5 years because fags are notorious for fucking every single other fag they know.
>>5727022
/pol/ please. We know you're a repressed faggot, stop projecting so hard.
>>5727022
Prep would become mandatory and failure to comply will result in the death penalty.
>>5727038
Am I wrong tho? ;^)
>>5718847
I hope it gets nuked if it does. I'll push the buttom myself. Queer nationalism is cuck as fuck.
>>5724358
>the lesbians would be forced to choose sides.
>gay guys or tranny+biscum
>"choice"
Not even close
>>5718880
YES
THEY FINALLY REMOVED THE UNNECESSARY AND INAPPROPRIATE """T""" FROM LGB
>>5718880
>Uninhabited and unrecognized by other goverbments
MY FUCKING SIDES
>>5720687
Dale.
We should form one....normies sent us to hell...but we're going even deeper. Our.... outer heaven.
>>5718847
Maybe, I imagine that once we start colonizing new planets and terraforming shit, getting a capital ship only for gay people wouldn't be that hard. Plus if being gay comes from a mix of genes+nurture making a bunch of gay kids won't be all that hard.
>>5718917
It'a not shitty, it's Camp :^)
>>5718847
we need to finish converting california to fag paradise
>>5718847
What happens if someone in that country is born straight? Do they have to leave?
>>5724429
Gays already have a Mecca.
>>5718847
>Could a LBGT nation ever exist in the near or far future?
>ever exist
Spot either the idiot or the guy with mpreg fetish.
If there is no reproduction, there is no nation.
>>5718847
Maybe a town that is super ultra LGBT friendly
>>5718861
What if your children ended up being straight? Would you disown them kind of like the straight parents you bitch about? Or would you try to force them to be gay?... also like the straight parents you bitch about.
>>5718847
Oh sweet mother of Christ, no. I would literally do all in my power to ensure that this nation is destroyed. I would spend days at a time begging president Trump for the codes to launch to every nuclear weapon in the United States onto this one singular nation so help me God.
>>5727038
>repressed
Except I'm actually out you retard faggot.
>>5718880
Aliens will never talk to us at this rate.
Why would you segregate yourself volunteraly?
>>5718861
Do you know where your adopted children are coming from?
Hint: it isn't from men getting asspregnant.
It would make things a lot easier:
>All the flaming fags go to live there.
>(Relatively) normal legbutts become more socially accepted in original countries.
>STD rates plummet in original countries, because the vast majority of people with them went to buttscrew isles.
>Most of the original countries accept gay marriage because LGBT isn't a technicolour memefest of degeneracy and open "relationships" any more.
>No more Lady Gaga/Madonna music ever again.
>Faggicus Maximi all die of AIDS and homophobic missile strikes.
>We get to forget the embarrassment that is LGBT "culture" and live respectable lives not dominated by our sexualities.
It would benefit most/all of us here desu.
>>5735762
soo basically we need concetration camps?
>>5735762
You're such a faggot.
>>5718847
We'd die out.
>>5718847
think about the huge demographic problems facing China with their One Child Policy. Japan has similar problems because they're overworked, so they don't have enough children. Europe is trying to fix their demographic problem by importing lots of fertile, prolific, Muslims... not going so well.
An LGBT nation would have a worse demographic problem than all of these places combined.
A few feminist lesbians have been doing this since the 70s.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/30/leah-devun_n_7690580.html
In general none of the attempts worked out though. Infighting, problems making money, problems with governance, etc.
AFAIK gay men haven't ever done anything like this, besides living in the gay ghettos themselves. Could be wrong though.
>>5736125
It's more of a choice really. If they want to go, they can. The rest of us who define ourselves using more than our sexual orientations would choose to remain in countries of origin.
Think of it as a filter to remove degeneracy by seeing who would opt for degeneracy over decency. Some places already have gay neigbhourhoods (see >>5738064) to isolate HIV, gay "pride", and hookups, and they were formed by homos, not heteros.
>tfw I realise I should probably be on /pol/.
