Why do I keep seeing legit threads being deleted? Like pic related one.
While all the bait threads, and the 5 copies of the 52y/o sissy, stays on the board.
>>5380631
Wondering then same thing. Mods are cool with the place being flooded by spam it seems. Heaven forbid lgbt people complain about fundamentalist political ideologies that want them dead though.
What the point in the board again?
It's obvious that the janitor has a hard on for feminism and can't have their pet ideology being challenged.
>>5380657
Is this serious? It feels like a poe.
Mods are lesbians with too much free time seeing as their gender studies classes are so easy.
They will delete anything that goes against their lesbian ideologies.
>>5380677
So then I take it they're totally cool with the "kill all faggots" spam or the stuff calling lgbt pedos. Honestly, don't know why I used to belong to that ideology.
>>5380693
faggots are men so yeah they are cool with it. And call lesbians pedos and the thread will be deleted, call gay men and trans women pedos and they will not touch the thread.
>>5380700
See I figured that if they were going to be hands off and let the place get flooded by shitposting, we could at least have good discussions. Ridiculous.
>>5380672
Pretty sure it's legit, tumblr is full of anti lgbt shit like this.
>>5380672
>>5380677
>>5380693
>>5380700
>>5380719
>>5380739
Calm the fuck down you nutty conspirators.
We've had previous threads on /lgbt/ before on "women are inferior, kill all women".
My guesses to why it was deleted:
> feminism topics are insta-deleted due to secret mod rules against any gamergate discussion
> someone flagged the topic as against the rules, which anyone can do to any other bait topic but no one does
I propose a test. Make several threads of varying bait topics and see which ones get deleted.
>>5380770
You act like I don't do this all the time. Anti-lesbian and anti-feminism threads are instantly deleted. Anti-trans and anti-gay threads are left alone.
>>5380770
GG wasn't even mentioned in that thread, and I fail to see how it's even relevant. There was one super butthurt trans radfem in the thread though, so maybe they reported it.
>>5380803
GG is a feminist talking point. Anyone against feminism must be a white cis basement dwelling fedora totting neck beard who supports gg and watches my little pony.
>>5380803
She wasn't trans she was a lesbian pretending to be trans.
>>5380770
What an alarmist, there was no urgency for anyone to "calm down" about anything not to mention it's an observable trend that any anti feminist thread gets deleted easily with many an anon such as yourself will say
>feminism has nothing to do with lgbt
Except when it does as feminists seem to get a hard on for telling people what to do and how to do it as evident but the "lgbt+ respect my pronouns or you're a misogynist" tirade.
I've been on this board since it first appeared and I can tell you it's a trend that doesn't know how to die.
>>5380819
That's retarded, but given the typical debating skills of the average feminist I guess I'm not surprised that they so swiftly resort to arguing with a strawman.
>>5380833
>I've been on this board since it first appeared and I can tell you it's a trend that doesn't know how to die.
I've been on this board too and I've seen a couple "why women suck" threads complete with anti feminist discussions in them. Not to mention that we're still free to shit on feminists in other non related threads or generals when the topic is bought up.
>>5380833
>where are our free speech threads?!?!
check it out:
>>5380412
>>5380770
>>5380788
>gg
Not one bit, plus we think idiots like Milo from the other end of the horseshoe are just as bad.
It was people complaining about the idiots from >>5376407
Radfems just decided to respond by getting mad and says Gid we should all die and get our meds taken away.
Why they get a pass and stuff like the protocols of the elders of zion tire >>5376407
about effeminate gay and trans people is kosher, but lgbt isn't allowed to create it's own threads about why radfems hate them is beyond me.
You'd think that if the former is acceptable, then the later would be too.
>>5380788
maybe you put instantly banning shit in your b8 threads? Nudes and shit like that? Completely unrelated topics?
>>5380867
>one thread exist therefore no problem exists!
>free speech
Are we using feminism logic here and nice putting words in my mouth, I simply notice a trend since the creation of the board that anti feminist threads get pulled down quicker than the daily anti gay ,anti trans threads. Is observation sexist and misogynistic for you leader?
>>5380850
Any they lasting as long as the 20+"trannies are ill" or " gay guys are the worst"? Not saying you're wrong, I'll check the whole catalog just to see if it's still the same shit.
>>5380875
Archive says their wasn't anything wrong with it.
Besides, if the mods endorse >>5376407, then why is it wrong for lgbt to start a thread saying the guys who write >>5376407 aren't lgbt's friends..
>>5380896
another one for you paranoia anon:
>>5380633
You could be right in that the mods are biased, but I'm gonna take a guess that the anti feminism threads don't last is because:
> majority of /lgbt/ is anti feminism so you're preaching to the choir
> transpeople eat bait like fucking crazy, they never leave that shit alone
> I've seen very few "gay men are the worst" threads, but those types of threads don't last long either
>>5380906
Not even really criticizing anyone there though. Just asking why spam threads never get taken care off.
>>5380897
i don't know what's going on, but my best guess is that someone reported your thread as against the rules so the mods just deleted it.
Only times my shitposts were deleted was when fucking pussies had me reported.
>>5380631
Dumb that this was removed, but thanks for posting. Really enjoyed her video. Good to know I'm not the only tranny who hasn't drank the feminism koolaid.
>>5380906
>> transpeople eat bait like fucking crazy, they never leave that shit alone
Nice deflecting lesbian. We know that trans people are largely against feminism. It is the lesbians who won't let shit go. I mean, lesbians are feminists after all. We see gay men are the worst threads, especially bug catcher/gift giver threads.
>>5380631
moot got keked by some feminist SJW bitch over GamerGate and gave 4chan to the ShitRedditSays mods before he left. That's why any criticism of/incapatability with feminism or mention of GamerGate/She Who Must Not Be Named will result in the thread autosaging.
Face it, this website is dead.
The mods on this board are so awful.
They are so inconsistent.
>>5380943
im trans actually.
>We know that trans people are largely against feminism.
hmmm, this is split really. Some of the trans women are anti feminist and the other half will die trying to defend it here.
>We see gay men are the worst threads, especially bug catcher/gift giver threads.
but bug catching/gift giving is a dumb boogeyman meme. Anyone who takes that seriously is gullible as fuck and eats bait for breakfast. If you're going to be stupid enough to believe all the baiting on bugcatching (which we haven't had a thread on for a while btw) then, yes, you deserve your b8 thread to be constantly gaining posts and attention on the front row of /lgbt/
yeah. this place doesn't seem very moderated. and like the report post function is probably 95% abuse of the function by idiots causing insane noise to signal and not targeting the actual harmful stuff on this website. they probably just look through things in a very cursory manner and make a lot of hasty mistakes when looking at text, only going after the traumatic and illegal shit like cp (who the fuck wants that job). with text they have to read, they probably really only have time to try and speculate if whether something is part of a greater stupid publicised war 4chan understandably doesn't want to be in the crossfire of. gamergate is a good example, whatever stupid side one would find themselves on, they'd have to be extremely invested in the topic to be willing to host a part of the stupid battlefield on the internet.
like i tried to make a normal post and it asked me to reformat it because it's system apparently thought it was spam. it wasn't. it did initially have a url in it, but just another direct copypasta like any other url ive shared. nothing spammy, but whatev. i'm more worried about 4chan just staying up the "free as in high definition porn" model would kill most other websites which must be like the bulk of their consumed bandwidth. they were down intermittently for a pretty long while the other day, and it made me find out the circumstances of moot leaving and i was like "oh. i don't know what this means, but uh oh?"
>>5380982
>hmmm, this is split really. Some of the trans women are anti feminist and the other half will die trying to defend it here.
accurate
>>5380973
even more accurate
hmm.. makes sense.
>>5380994
I don't think there's active mods here that care about this place. I think they are just people that come here casually based on reports. I spammed a bunch of murder gay threads back in August and only got the threads that I posted with pepe deleted. But than I posted once a thread about how trans are like women in every single way except you can beat them when they act up and they deleted it and banned me for offtopic but I just repealed and ban evaded anyway.
I honestly have no clue what the mods are thinking what goes through what gets a ban and what doesn't. I used to get three week bans for avatarfagging bit they stopped giving me those.
yeah desu, i'm semi-glad the thread pictured in the OP was flagged as bait because it looks like garbage usually attributed to /pol/. on an lgbt forum that is literally bait, like who here to which lgbt actually applies, actually cares about cis het men's opinions even if it's over some asshole trans woman? there are enough people who already want to #dropthet here, and trans women like me who are 100% ok being dropped and put elsewhere
>>5381016
jesus, now I feel kinda bad for the mods. They basically have to be watchdogging /lgbt/ 24/7 for all shitposts, ban evaders, and spam to keep up and do it for free.
no wonder they just give up.
>>5380850
Just so we are clear, threads about the privilege women experience and how they are blind to/in denial of those privileges are not "why women suck"
Saying women are the most privileged people to walk the planet is not hate but rather asking for reflection on how we can elevate the lives of men and trans people who face violence every day.
like i even forgot i can't say t-b_h here and it's converted to desu. does 4chan really want us taking this place seriously, or would they rather we take our elsewhere serious potentially polarising shit leading to bizarre wars, traffic, takedown orders and who knows whatever else you have to deal with as a website hosting contentious shit while not being a giant like reddit?
>>5381037
That's another thing when a few posters I won't give names post because they posted cp or whatever INSTANTLY they get banned so I think someone is watching but I think they just give us free reigns. Honestly I have no clue what's going on or thinking. Its not like fit or a where you're going to get banned instantly and they try to make it hard for you to evade.
>>5380982
Have a hard time imagining the anon who was defending those pundits who call transexuals monster rapists and wrote that 'transition is a sin against feminism' thread is trans.
i saw cp for the first time on this website, and it like made me numb to the point i wandered so far from where i lived at the time i literally got lost in the city i grew up in and had to lie on a bench until people in the morning starting waking up and morning buses resumed so i could ask where i even was.
coinicidentally it was a thread i started literally about light rail rapid transit vehicles, yeah so like i guess someone was like huhuhu someone's literally talking abt trains, lets see how much this fag can sperg. i like stopped using the website entirely back then but i can't imagine how much that must have happened and they had to frantically delete shit like that.
if they even just think see stuff stuff maybe internet-glued angry militant mras or trans women might obsess over, i can easily see why they might just say "not worth it" and delete it. like last night, i'm not kidding, an admin for a facebook page was like swatted over an argument over trans women's inclusion on dating sites/apps. fine whatever, people have hurt feels they need to air, but when they start going absolutely fucking insane with what they're willing to do, you likely very quickly find yourself dangerously outside your area of expertise, even if you already are operating professionally in some capacity. and since they already have bigger fish to fry like getting cp off the site, holy fuck.
>>5381105
uhh except that i didn't defend b8 threads against transwomen and I didn't start any of those threads you were talking about.
which post are you talking to because I never wrote down "transition is a sin".
>>5381105
i saw one of your posts before. The one where you admitted you pretend to be a transbian trolling lesbians to make lesbians hate transwomen even more than they already do.
Please stop pretending you care about transpeople you two faced cunt. Just stop. You're as fake and as shallow as the SJWs. Just fuck off and quit using transpeople as your progressive brownie points like how faghags treat gay men.
>>5381128
idk but it's not as if we don't have a lot of hons who roleplay as -erfs, and actual cis -erfs don't seem to realise they have obsessive stalkers on their hands who can't deal with their internal shit and are like bleeding them for a slight sense of token approval. i seriously worry what happens when they stop humouring them, and the some trans -erf wannabes start feeling slighted?
so many shades of crazy we just have to accept just doesn't fucking end, but might actually impact our right to exist in society at some point. it would be pretty easy to do, change the legal status of hormones, have them nailed to fda cleared uses; what do you do if you can't like have a safe place to um have normal bodily functions at work. it's shockingly easy to start forcing us back into the margins of society, we're a total legal gray area.
everything is awful and will make you neurotic and fearful. like rationally fearful, but it doesn't mean how you cope won't be itself immensely irrational (the story of a lot of trans women) a trans woman thinking they can actually be an -erf or a credibly "gender critical" in the popular sense is just one example
>>5381134
Idk, scan for key words. Does it look like I'm talking about anything the even interests you? If so, I can use capital letters which seems to help with this sometimes.
>>5381217
pfft,
>>5381192
I straight cismale and I have a few stalkers here. There's actually a bunch of stalkers here. Everyone's pretty crazy here like legit.
>>5380971
This. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a newphaggot.
>>5381128
Not talking to you. Unless you wrote >>5376407 or you're the ditum fan from there, it's something else.
>>5380657
>"One of the men are given the role of a woman"
Explain frot you nigger.
>>5381483
fuck dat boipussy
>>5380631
I really don't feel LGBT-people have anything to gain by agreeing with anti-feminist or anti-LGBT-people.
>>5381544
lol
nah, discussions on this subject don't really help anybody here, nah, lets stop doing that
>>5381544
Lol, you make it sound like that stops feminist central from making new decrees on what lgbt should and shouldn't do legally. I can't wait for a Hillary presidency to really hammer in that, disagreement =! agreement with 100% with anti feminists.
>>5381645
>feminists helped passed gay marriage
You honestly believe anything anyone says without question do you? You nor anyone has even bothered to explain why lgbt needs feminism but somehow they are "necessary" and help the lgbt community [breaking a vase, repairing it and demanding praise for it is now the same as helping apparently]. For every one "reasonable" feminist, i got a backlog of emails about how misogynistic my views are for not wanting to listen to whiny women complain about every single thing that inconveniences them. "transgender people are suffering misogyny because of their conformity to gender values" yeah no.
>>5381704
People who identify as LGBT consist of barely 4 % of the total population, depending on which statistic you look at. The LGBT-community needs allies, and feminists in general tend to sympathize and have similar goals as LGBT-people (of course there are the crazies, but don't let those represent all of feminism). What would happen without allies? The conservatives would certainly not help legalize gay marriage, for example.
>>5381756
>but don't let those represent all of feminism
they tow the party line m8
2nd wave equality/empowerment feminists are shunned upon these days
>>5381174
>i saw one of your posts before. The one where you admitted you pretend to be a transbian trolling lesbians to make lesbians hate transwomen even more than they already do.
Wasn't me, blame shitposters from rad or pol for that.
>two faced cunt
Gay male who takes estrogen for bizarre personal reasons. I've made it more than clear that I don't see myself as trans and I don't speak for them.
That said, radicals have made it clear they want to ban bodily autonomy and they see stricter requirements as a way to do that.
If and when they have their way, it becomes impossible to access hrt and other minor enough procedures without transitioning, and somehow they have the gall to accuse others of pushing stereotypes.
That makes it every bit my business. I have just as much a right to keep my body from rotting as they do for their contraceptives. Not speaking for trans, just my natural rights.
>>5381756
LGBT "allies" aren't feminsts, we can have "allies" without having any feminist on our side.
>STILL using SJW unironically
>STILL hating on feminists for defending your interests
This board is retarded.
>>5381776
Second wave is the ones who pushed obscenity laws against gays and criminalized doctors providing hrt.
Find some better heroes.
>>5381791
Are you the same harpy that threw a temper tantrum in the last thread? The one that called everyone who disagreed with her idiot and retard multiple times while performing olympic medal-tier mental gymnastics to ignore/justify the blatant sexism and regressive attitudes deeply ingrained in contemporary feminism?
>>5380833
What year was this board made?
>>5381794
They were the last feminists that actually achieved anything even remotely recognizable as gender equality. They're hardly my heroes but at least they had some positive merits to them that the third wave now uses as their guise to push their authoritarian and sexist agendas.
>>5381756
Nice "conservative" boogeyman and well done towing the line with the "no true scotsman". No feminst cares about the lgbt, it's just another useful tool for their bullshit "system of oppression" model where being the newest brand of gender and genitalia is what dictates your role in their nonsense.
>>5381791
Explain the 30 year ban on trans health care? Oh right no true scotsman.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/ban-lifted-on-medicare-coverage-for-sex-change-surgery/2014/05/30/28bcd122-e818-11e3-a86b-362fd5443d19_story.html
>SJW isn't a term
At least I know you don't get into tumblr cults as much of the "progressive" left has been going. Mirco aggressions, political corrects, cultural are all part of the baggage, either all or nothing.
>>5381812
>Such as? Who else is willing to stand up for LGBT-people?
>nobody but feminism stands up for the gays!
That level of intellectual dishonesty is terrifying.
>>5381812
>The majority of feminists simply believe in equal rights.
They're the blind sheep that bought into the cult out of peer pressure or positive association with 2nd wave equality feminism.
>>5381791
Yea I can totally see from your stuff in >>5376407 that you only want to help lgbt.
And by help I mean portray everyone lgbt as evil rapists and ban our medicine.
>>5381544
Maybe you should stop equating "anti-feminist" with "anti-LGBT" then.
>>5381825
Starting pogroms against minorities and using them to win conservative support says a lot.
National socialists probably had some good ideas like their stem investment and environmentalism but you don't see me singing their praises.
>>5381812
>The majority of feminists simply believe in equal rights.
If that was true then why are the vast percentage of people in Western society, including women, unwilling to identify as feminist? Could it have something to do with the massive amount of baggage that is part and parcel of the term?
>>5381838
You didn't answer my question: who other than feminists are willing to stand up for LGBT-people?
>>5381841
So if you believe in equal rights you're a sheep? Is that what you're saying?
>>5381848
I didn't, that's why the "or" is there. However, a lot of anti-feminists tend to also be anti-LGBT, which is why I feel it's a dangerous ground to tread on.
>>5381868
Most people simply aren't politically active. Historically, most people haven't identified as feminists either, despite believing in equality.
>>5381884
Social Liberals and other human rights groups.
Case in point after second wave banned medical treaent for trans and pushed obscenity laws against gays it was civil rights groups that fought our legal challenges.
Feminism just worked with the right to tar us as evil child rapists. The ACLU actually fought to keep us free.
>>5381884
>However, a lot of anti-feminists tend to also be anti-LGBT
And a lot of them are pro-LGBT, or even LGBT themselves.
>>5381862
>Starting pogroms against minorities and using them to win conservative support says a lot.
And you can look at what modern feminism is doing to free speech, male rights and how men are seen in society in general. Guilty until proven innocent with rape cases and such. It's a clusterfuck of absolute vitriolic sexist cancer AND they are seen as politically correct and righteous for it. Disagreeing with them means you hate women and shit.
There's no justification to being a feminist at this day and age unless you're fine with drinking the sexist lobby koolaid or simply willfully ignorant to what the third wave is pushing for. Gender quotas alone are a reason enough to trash the whole fucking label and go with egalitarian or humanist instead if you actually respect individual rights over the 'greater good'
>>5381884
>So if you believe in equal rights you're a sheep? Is that what you're saying?
No I'm saying that if you think contemporary feminism is for equal rights you're a sheep. There's absolutely no reason to take any of the baggage that comes with the feminist label these days and their actions speak against equal rights.
Why take a sexist label instead of egalitarian or humanist one? There's no fucking justification at this day and age to promote that misandrist viewpoint and give fuel to the vocal radfems steering the clusterfuck
>>5381916
>go with egalitarian or humanist instead
I've seen some feminists decrying both of those labels recently. Apparently they've gotten tired of having people say "I'm egalitarian" in response to their insistence that you MUST be a feminist if you believe in gender equality. If feminism is such a positive label, why do they have to try so hard to force it upon others by being intellectually dishonest and saying that the dictionary definition of feminism is all feminism is about?
>>5381884
>>5381645
And by the way, radical feminism lead the charge against gay marriage in the UK. they saw it as some evil culture of decadance bourgeoisie thing and convinced Labour to fight it throughout their government.
Or openly campaigning for banning medical care. You haven't done anything for lgbt that the fundies haven't. Even liberal feminist people say so.
https://sarahlicity.co.uk/2015/01/19/how-not-to-be-a-transgender-labour-candidate/#more-1006
https://sarahlicity.co.uk/2013/01/15/the-guardians-trans-hate-week/
>>5380829
The hell? Why would anyone want to be a trans person?
>>5382416
Probably meant false flagging for an argument.
>>5381884
>You didn't answer my question: who other than feminists are willing to stand up for LGBT-people?
Why should I answer you when you didn't answer me, why is feminism, necessary to the lgbt? I don't know which other anon said something about allies but that was not the reason at all how feminism got involved and don't give me that "feminism is fore equality" slogan when feminism as I'll vividly reminded by screeching harpies has multiple branches and TERFs and Radfems are "just a part and small [yet well listened] minority!". I live in the caribbean ,where's all these feminist allies ready to fight for my legal rights? Oh right they were too busy quoting the third world as part of their "pretend to give a damn" quota to whine about some mundane social aspect.
