My friend keeps showing me this chart, arguing that "28% of gay men have had over 1000 partners". Can someone tell me a little bit about the authenticity of this chart?
>28% of homosexuals
> with >1000 sexual partners
Are you this dumb? Do you even need to take the time to check the provided source?
If you only questioned 100 year old faggots, who all started having sex at the age of 13, they'd need to have sex with 11.5 different people each year. Every year. Until they were 100.
Do you see the stupidity?
i mean, did they only interview sex workers?
because there's a lot of us in survival sex work, mostly from being made homeless by asshole bigoted parents.
I've seen the chart before. It's nonsense. All of those citations and sources are either from the 1980s or from anti-gay pro-family groups like the FRC. These exact stats I believe come from this group: https://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promiscuity
Is promiscuity a problem in the gay community? Sure. Do gay men have hundreds of sexual partners? The vast majority do not. Per year the average gay man has between 2-3 sexual partners per year
>http://www.aidsmap.com/Consistent-decline-in-partner-numbers-in-US-gay-men-in-last-decade-but-no-change-in-condom-use/page/2635086/
>The mean number of male sexual partners MSM reported in the previous year fell significantly from 2.9 to 2.3 between the two surveys (p = 0.035) and was more marked in men under 24 years old (mean 2.9 to 2.1 partners, p = 0.027). The number of partners also fell in men aged 35 to 44 from 3.0 to 2.2, though this was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.07).
>>5174186
>Are you this dumb? Do you even need to take the time to check the provided source?
holy shit asshole, I think the question is ARE YOU this dumb? When my friend first showed me this chart I literally said "stopped reading there" after quoting the 1000 sex partners thing. I didn't post this chart in defense of the chart, I posted it here because I think it's total bullshit. Now if you would excuse me? I would really like to not be harassed.
>>5174236
i dont think you can blame any of us for assuming you're just another dumb troll when you post stuff like this without an explanation of your own personal stance on it.
>>5174260
No, I am posting it here because I think it looks extremely biased and suspicious. Sorry.
>>5174166
>muh mainstream media
Every time I see this phrase i chuckle
>>5174236
>getting this fucking butthurt
Not him but chill out.
Literally every citation that chart gives is from like 40 years ago. And it's pretty much all bullshit. Like >>5174199 said, when you actually look into each individual citation it's done by places with agendas or just simply out of date an irrelevant.
I don't know why anyone cares about this shit anyways.
>fags have aids, fags that fuck a lot get more aids
Woopty fucking doo. This isn't the media boogie mans fault, it's the CDC's fault. They have drugs that are proven to prevent HIV transmission with 100% certainty, they just don't talk about it or commercialize it because they're scared people will stop using condoms.
So instead of people contracting easily curable STD's they'd rather let fags get aids.
Absolutely nothing to do with the media what so ever, though.
>>5174276
I thought the chart seemed really suspicious at first... I don't feel comfortable with your tone anyways. I appreciate the facts though so whatever.
>>5174292
no wonder your friend likes to troll your ass
>>5174305
>>5174166
I'm like 986 guys short...
>>5174305
>Gets evidence thrown in front of him
>Must be trolling
Typical faggots
>>5174236
>i dont want to be harassed anonymously
>>5174329
>thinks that's evidence
Sasuga pill salesman.
>>5174345
Then disprove it instead of saying it's trolling you degenerate liberal puppet.
>>5174355
>post image daily
>if it isn't debunked every single time it suddenly becomes true by default
critical thinking is truly a foreign subject to you conservakeks
>>5174292
>I don't feel comfortable with your tone anyways.
This is some top tier b8
>>5174364
>It has a christian source so it's wrong
Wow you pointed out that in one of these cases, it was a Christian source.
And sources specifically targetted to promote faggotry probably aren't twisted I assume?
Here's another source for you, straight from the CDC.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/
>>5174371
Are you implying I post this every single day?
Because Im not the OP.
And funny, last time I checked only neolibs give a shit about muh feelings and not facts.
>>5174403
>lots of fags have aids
and water is wet
what's your point?
>>5174403
>Are you implying I post this every single day?
yes you are the only person in the history of legbutt to post that image on this board even though i just said it gets posted daily congratulations
>>5174403
>Wow you pointed out that in one of these cases
They're ALL biased sources. For instance the one that says gay men live 20 years shorter lives on average is immediately a red flag that shows the entire chart is nonsensical. If you are diagnosed with HIV tomorrow you will live a life that is JUST as long as if you weren't diagnosed with HIV tomorrow.
http://www.healthline.com/health-news/hiv-life-expectancy-for-americans-with-hiv-reaches-parity-121813
So that's two claims made by this chart that I've looked into for this thread and both are fucking ridiculously wrong. Almost comically incorrect in fact. But go on, keep using it as a source on /pol/ and posting it every time a thread about homosexuality comes up. Because it doesn't matter to the stormfront idiots what is actually proven and true.
>28% of gay men have had over 1000 partners
That's bullshit. There's probably less gays in my city than that.
>>5174292
>I don't feel comfortable with your tone
This has to be a fucking joke
OOh wait this thread just turned out to be b8, again.
