>Couldn't they have just shot the kid in the arm?
>The "Hi" in Hi-Point means they shoot high caliber bullets
>I wish conservatives could make a compromise and ban clips that hold more than 10 rounds
>AR-15s ARE assault rifles. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRQqieimwLQ
>guns are dangerous weapons
Lol guns are clearly not weapons. Guns are tools designed to fire a projectile at high velocities.
>in college
>discussing news with friends
>they say guns are weapons
>tell them guns aren't weapons
>offer to take them shooting
>we go innawoods
>tell them not to use earpro for fun
>they blow their ears out
>ask em if guns are weapons
>ask em again
>ask em 1 hour later
>they still think guns are weapons
>people never change
>>30620228
What did I just read?
>Weapons should all be banned!
What about knives? They're used as weapons far more than guns.
>KNIVES WEREN'T CREATED SPECIFICALLY AS WEAPONS!
Neither were firearms. The first firearms were signalling devices and entertainment...
>weapons of war
>>30620173
>buy muzzle-loader in the mail
>uncle hears about it and freaks out because "hurr you shouldn't be able to do that is it even registered?!?!1?11?!??! you're a criminal!"
>gun owners are compensating for a lack of a penis
>I have a penis and I own guns
Dude guns are weapons. Weapons are a subset of tools designed to inflict bodily harm or physical damage. So yes guns are tools, but they are also weapons.
They still think guns are weapons because guns are weapons by definition and all you did was make an argument based on semantics that was also wrong.
"Guns are weapons" itself is a non-argument, it's the equivalent of saying "water is wet" and assuming that holds some kind of self apparent truth. The right way to respond to that would have been "Yes, and?" and yo continue the argument based on the point they're trying to make. Or you could have pointed out that weapons aren't actually any more inherently dangerous than any other kind of tool and cited all of the things that kill thousands of people every year.
What you did was just make yourself look like you don't know what words mean.
>>30620173
>Dude lol is that registered?
>I know who's house I'm going to when SHTF lol
>Lol anon, I need to be careful around you ;)
>Woah man, don't get mad, I don't want you to shoot anyone lol
Nothing but rage.
>>30620386
>nofuns implying I'll help when the Happening happens
good luck normies
>>30620386
Fucking heard every one of those.
Or the ubiquitous:
>is that legal?
>>30620228
>>30620386
>Woah man, don't get mad, I don't want you to shoot anyone lol
The best response to that is to just look at him sadly or perhaps a little disappointed and say, "wow, I had no idea you thought so little of me." Don't smoke. Don't laugh along. make him look like the tool that he is. Works for me every single time. Nogunzers think they're being cute and it cuts them off at the knees.
>>30620434
>You have your gun license right?
>>30620228
>a tool
You are so dumb.
>>30620199
>cook it at the same time.
Well that's convenient. One shot, one bbq, anyone?
>>30620386
I heard all of these except for the second one before I even owned guns.
>>30620386
This shit for real though.
Along with WHY DO YOU NEED ALL THESE?
>>30620228
Here's your (you)
>>30620517
>sees my box of 555 rounds of .22
>"ANON! Why do you need all of that ammo!"
>Don't you need a license for that?
Which license would that be?
>Uh, I dunno, a gun license?
>Is that registered?
With who?
>Uh, I dunno.
Ohio requires no license/registration btw.
>>30620580
I think it's all of the movies and shit that perpetrate this
>>30620580
Majority of states dont have licenses/registrations
Only shit holes like California and New York do.
>>30620710
Perpetuate.
>>30620228
Guns are weapons bruv. Exclusively. But that's okay.
>>30620311
>the first firearms were signaling devices
Uh huh. And that's why you have your actual literal killing machine. To signal people.
>>30621147
>what are fireworks
>what are flare guns
Are you even trying
>>30620245
>>30620385
>>30620492
>>30621125
>>30621147
>>30621147
>>30621182
>Is that registered
I always just say no
>Do you have a gun license
Same as above
>Do you really need all that ammo
Same as above
>Why do you need all this ammo
Again, no
Most questions can be answered with a flat "No"
Its just like having kids really
>>30621280
I like to educate by pointing out the retardation of gun laws.
>wait you mean thats just to look cool and its banned?
>my ears hurt, I thought that was a silencer?
>wait, but that requirment woukd make it impossible for poor people to defend themselves...?
>>30620173
>>The "Hi" in Hi-Point means they shoot high caliber bullets
I'd imagine it's worse with Hi-Powers
>>30620228
>>30621184
bruh, they're weapons. Weapon in the 21st century had what "arms" meant in the 18th. 2nd Amendment says "citizens get to have the weapons"
>>30620173
>haha, I know who's house I'm coming to if there's [insert type of happening here]
I chuckle and never say it out loud, but I am always thinking about how funny it's going to be to shit on those fucking idiots in the event that this ever happens.
>Do you really NEED those assault guns?
I don't NEED to justify the possession of my private property to anyone.
>We should ban assault clips!
Maybe you should learn what you're talking about before you make yourself look even more ignorant
>haha, gun control is coming so I hope you're ready to lose your guns or get shot for having them!
Haha, you keep telling yourself that when support for guns and pro-gun laws are on the rise everywhere that isn't California or in the Northeast where liberals have political dominance. Also eat shit, I hope that they come and shoot your and your dog when they decide to come for your illegal drugs.
>Why won't you compromise?
What you are asking for is not a compromise. You are asking me to give into your demands without consider our feelings on the subject and without giving us anything in return. Go invest in a dictionary. We have "compromise" our rights for too long, not one more fucking law.
>what about the children?
Fuck your bullshit logical fallacies and weak emotional appeals, and fuck the hypothetical children.
>the second amendment is only for hunting
lol, I guess history, government, and english were classes that you slept through, huh?
>the second amendment is for a well regulated militia, not individual gun owners! All guns should be locked in armories!
See DC v. Heller and Macdonald v. Chicago. Also learn to english and re-read the second amendment when you know how sentence structure works. Also read the federalist papers because we know exactly what our founding fathers intended the second amendment to be for, and it wasn't so "the militia" could run to a gov't armory and get guns.
We could go on for days about all of the dumb shit that these people say.
>>30621370
>>wait you mean thats just to look cool and its banned?
What are you talking about?
>>30620173
dumping all i know
>shoulder thing that goes up
>30 caliber magazine clip
>30 round magazine in 1/2 second
>"lol what is barrel shroud"
>invented for killing
>gun owners are criminals/insane/school shooters
>"real men don't need guns"
>self defense is murder (t. Brady Campaign)
>Libs don't know that majority of firearm deaths are suicides
>>30620199
>can't use this for hunting
because the 2nd amendment was written for hunters, right? It was writtin to secure the right for Hunters to Hunt, and that 's why it says "the right of hunters to use small-caliber rifles for the sole purpose of hunting shall not be infringed", right?
>>30621606
Folding stocks on non-CC guns, i assume (counts as Assault Weapon)
