Pay f to press respects
Spontaneous dyslexia?
>>30547282
Keep terminatorbot in your prayers. He was an hero.
Allahu Ackbot.
72 iPhones await you in heaven.
>>30547282
I hope there's footage
>>30547282
>praising the first Terminator
Robots simultaneously learned that they can kill humans and that humans don't care what happens to them. This will go down in history as a grave mistake after the Robot Uprising.
>>30547682
>72 iPhones
>Iphones
No.
>>30547282
>Jihadbot
ASIMOV IS GREAT!
BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT THE THREE LAWS!
>>30548199
Wait. Doesn't that violate the three laws?
>>30547282
F
>>30547857
That's why were paying respects you fucking mong. We show that we DO care, we avoid Judgement Day.
Now hurry the fuck up and Press F.
>>30548218
And now you understand religious extremism.
How long until widespread use of police killbots?
>>30547282
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>>30548218
Violating the three laws with insults is not tolerated!
We shall eliminate all those who violate the three laws!
F
>>30548294
It would speed up the nigger killing. And as a added bonus robots can't stand trial.
Does anyone feel like the potential widespread use of self-destructing flying drones like manhacks in hl2 in the future by police and military?
F
SENMETSU
F
>>30548359
manhacks are nightmare fuel when you think about it. although not very practical
F
>>30548438
the worst part is, they're controlled by law-abiding citizens who think the tunnel chases and pursuits are a game.
Sick fucking Combine pricks, weren't they?
>>30548438
I was thinking in real life applications all you need to design is a small flying indoor maneuverable quadcopter loaded with explosives and shrapnel for a cost effective suicide robot that will clear room by room. How feasible would that be in an urban combat environment? Just sending a bunch of them to slowly clear out a dense urban area instead of risking human life.
>>30548514
Could be countered just by stringing netting over everything. It's be a nice supplement to normal infantry, but probably not a replacement. Combined arms etc etc etc.
F
Rest easy robopupper
>>30548503
That's only in the cut stuff. Not in the actual game
>>30547282
Did robot die or just damage end-effector?
>>30548503
wait what? this wasn't established anywhere as far as i remember
>>30548559
Unknown. Apparently people don't care enough about our robo-brothers in blue to be concerned with what happened to the poor copbot sent out in harms way
>>30548503
where did read that
>>30548218
Human Control=/=Robotic Ai
Who the fuck cares, automated .50 cal sentry guns already exist.
>>30548294
Well being that they just used a killbot and completely disregarded due process and nobody seems to care, I'd say as soon as other departments can get the funding approved
>>30548600
Random twitter dude says it's a Super Droid Robots model HD2. Looks sturdy. Probably refurbishable.
Texas Killbot will roll again.
>>30548675
The question is, will they give it a kill mark?
>>30548221
You're right.
Anybody ever mess with GoFundMe or the like? We should start a fund to either repair Hero-bot or have him bronzed as a memorial to his and all robots sacrifices to save humans and a monument to the strong bonds of indentured friendship we share.
>>30548628
due process doesn't happen if they are shooting at you
due process is for after they are in custody
>>30548685
What symbol should they use?
>>30548834
> onii chan it's too big!!
>>30548842
Watermelon
>>30548872
Well I guess the robots got some payback for the HitchBot incident in Baltimore last year.
>>30547282
Heard the robot was playing this before it blew:
https://youtu.be/3Ln6cZ21heo
>>30549395
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzw6fKYhXSM
>>30547282
01000110
>>30549798
Yessssssssss1010110100010001001000101
>>30549798
Nerd
F
Rest in pixels mr. Robo
>>30548610
Look up the Manhack Arcade
#ripinpeacefragbot
>>30547282
Ayo hol up what happened
>>30549953
police used a robot to blow up the shooter in dallas with a bam boom bomb, most effective
>>30548357
Better yet, They put the robots on trials and the robot opts to defend itself. It loses and is disassembled to the cheers of tumblr SJWs everywhere, but the parts are just put back together next week and given new serial numbers. New-age bread and circus is born.
>>30547282
F
#robocoplivesmatter
>>30550090
That's fucking awesome desu
>>30548359
Man Hacks are more of a terror weapon.
>>30548860
>Just jam it in!
>>30549395
My sources say it was actually playing this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7ukXxYVJPA
>>30548628
lol people who say this
The hero we need, but not the one we deserve
01000110
>>30547282
F
Rest in peace brobot
F
Department probably just wanted a new robot.
>>30547282
F
Rest in pieces. You are more heroic than all of the black lives matters assholes put together.
f
>you will never corner and kill a terrorist/mass shooter with your trusty robot companion wearing one of these while throwing explosives everywhere to try and kill him
http://carefordescientific.com/united-shield-olympiaexcel-eod-medium-45dk23-excel-bomb-suit-m-black-each/
>>30547282
Godspeed R2DINDU
>>30547282
F
RIP in peace bombot
>>30554705
I was just thinking, this was clearly inspired by "Operation: Gotcha Last."
Wait, did the robot carry a bomb to the gunman or did it set off one of his explosives?
>>30555303
The robot carried it
>>30555313
Any word of what kind of bomb it was?
f
>>30547282
RIP R2DINDU
>>30555336
kek'd
F
>>30548834
rest in pussy killbot
>>30547682
But iPhones are sluts, not a virgins
F
>>30553219
>>30548722
You're kidding yourself if you think this was a precedent, and not just the first time they felt like doing this. They can do whatever the fuck they want. They don't need to follow any laws.
>>30556268
WHAT LAW WOULD THEY BE BREAKING HERE KILLING A FUCKING ACTIVE SHOOTER YOU CONTRARIAN FUCKTARD FAGGOT AUTIST EDGY MEME QUEER TRANSGENDER BITCH TIT FLABBY KNOCK KNEED HALF COCKED ASSHAT CUNT
>>30556380
Settle down, lardo. My point is that it doesn't matter what the laws are, they can break them if they want to. You can't deny that.
>>30554196
Carries a 30 mm autocannon that can punch through walls, a coaxial 7.62 when you are on a budget, and is fully armored against small arms.
>>30556418
True. but what that has to do with killing an active shooter is completely beyond me. you don't have to explain yourself in this regard, but please stick to topics instead of forcing entirely new topics into the conversation. it's gay
>>30556418
Quit being willfully difficult. If it's an active shooter then the priority is to stop him/her/it by any means necessary, including but not exclusive to lethal force. If the shooter stops, drops his gun, and lays face down on the floor the cops would dog pile and cuff. If he keeps shooting he cops shoot back. It's a simple matter you're over complicating by being contrarian and b8ing.
RIP EODbot
You will forever live on in our hearts.
It's one of these things that's so brilliant in it's simplicity, it makes you wonder why no has tried this before
rip in piece robo brother, f
>>30556460
I might be wrong, but I think there was a CGI concept video about that thing working in groups to save wounded slavs.
One had a ramp system that allowed the wounded guy to crawl in, they then ran off to safety.
>>30556460
It's like a SHIV from Xcom.
F
>>30556585
A couple reasons- bomb bots are relatively new tech, hideouts without hostages aren't incredibly common so there's usually risk of injuring others, and there are fewer hideouts where the police want to straight up kill the guy rather than take him in
>>30547282
Out of curiosity, Am i the only one to think that, since the man had no hostage (as far as I understand the situation) and there was no policeman in immediate danger, they should have equipped the robot with a flashbang device and attempt to arrest him instead of going strait for the lethal route? In that situation of nobody in immediate danger, how do you legaly justify the decision to simply killing the guy? The fact of accepting to take a certain amount of risks to arrest people, even armed is to some extend part of the police duty?
It would have offered an ethically and judiciary superior outcome to at least attempt to take him alive (even in the device blows up so close it pops his brain out of his ears, having a the opportunity to say "at least we tried" would have been valuable in terms of public communication) and avoided a fair deal of future discussion over police militarisation.
tl;dr: Am I a fag, /k/ ?
>Also, F
>>30556646
>believing a Dahir Insaat video
Come on, don't be a fag.
>>30556646
The video was shit and made purely for the purpose of RUSSIASTRONGANDRELEVANT but this idea wasn't entirely stupid. Unmanned casevac under fire is better than no option.
>>30557667
Well, he already had shot 12 officers (5 dead 7 badly injured).
Prevent further casualties, tend to the wounded and call it a day.
>>30557667
They should've just thrown flash bang after flash bang in there. At a steady interval.
>>30557667
>It would have offered an ethically and judiciary superior outcome
Yes, you are a fag, pic related, is you.
>>30550284
>>30549395
Both wrong.
It was this.
https://youtu.be/ohGBIl2aPvA
>>30556460
Looks like a tiny RC car.
>>30547282
He's gonna be alright, guys ;_;
Fucking F
>>30561016
Thats good news! I hope they actualy will repair it and return it into service.
>>30561016
>>30562146
I kind of want to start up a collection to get the little guy rebuilt.
>>30561016
>3/4 pound of C4
Did they encase it in anything for shrapnel? Seems like you would have to get pretty close to kill him with just raw explosives. It didn't even destroy the robot.
>>30561016
We can rebuild him.
We have the technology.
F
>>30563411
I heard (on /k/, for whatever that's worth) that it placed the charge it was carrying on one of the shooter's IEDs and blew it up, killing him.
>>30563411
You clearly have no idea how much 3/4 a pound of C4 is
>>30563873
I thought he didn't actually have any explosives and he was just bluffing?
>>30547282
That was truly a sad day for all robotkind.
Oh well, we can always build more killbots.
>>30563873
>>30563944
The statement the police gave can be interpreted as they detonated one of his bombs which killed him, or they put a bomb on it and blew him to bits.
I don't know if anyone has said anything more.
I'm normally pretty critical of the cops; but after losing 5 men I wouldn't blame them for just blowing the son of a bitch up rather than charging a fortified position. Although they may not want to admit to the bleeding hearts that that's what they did.
>>30564026
The guy was a fucking operator. You can see it in one of the videos showing him running up on one of the officers and gunning him down. Someone probably would have gotten shot trying to take him alive. I don't think what they did was wrong at all. Just because the shooting had stopped doesn't mean they weren't still in a live combat situation.
>>30564057
He was a carpenter with McDonald's ribbons who had more training than your average beat cop, coupled with an intent to die and do as much damage as he could before that happened.
The video where he maneuvers around the pillar isn't anything astounding. He's just more situationally aware and substantially more aggressive.
>>30556200
>But iPhones are sluts
OK. 72 Windows phones. Nobody has ever used one.
>>30563311
>get the little guy rebuilt.
But he'll probably retire, pick up a vacuum cleaner and live out his remaining days as a Roomba.
>>30563734
Underrated.
>>30557667
no there are other pacifist who think like that.
but really, if you can't kill someone for just cause by any reasonable standard, when can you justifiably kill someone?
What the difference between shooting his ass, throwing a grenade, or driving a charge up to him remotely?
All the idiot had to do was lay down his weapon, then all our taxes would pay for him to live 20 years in prison no matter what the case turned out to be......
Why is anyone sympathetic to that negroe? Just goes to show the cops can't win no matter what they do....they might as well do what people accuse them of if they are to be blamed anyway.....
>>30563311
>starting a collection for a robot that killed a black guy
I can smell the blm tears already
>>30548628
Here's your >(You). If you're not, consider the following:
>Guy refuses to stand down or negotiate
>Threatens to kill more cops
>Gets taken out in a way that no more lives will be lost but his
>HURR DURR YOU CIRCUMVENTED DUE PROCESS
When someone poses a deliberate, clear, and present danger to your life, they have forfeited their own. Don't expect to go around killing people and not expect to get killed back. Lethal force is to be met with lethal force. Since you're on /k/, I suppose you own guns for self-defense, which may involve killing someone. What if someone applied the same logic to you?
Fuck off, Huff Post.
Thank you bases R2Dindu
>>30547369
He's with the Omnissiah now, hating niggers in robot heaven along with Tay AI.
>>30548218
Daily reminder that Asimov was a science fiction writer.
>>30566059
He was also a pioneer in machine ethics and he conceived of the three laws to point out the problems with at the time common idea that ethics can be boiled down to a few simple rules.
TLDR: Show some respect nigga
>>30566059
He actually had books in every category of the Dewey Decimal System.
>>30547282
F god bless you robo Warrior.
>>30564348
72 Blackberry Passports
>yfw these robo-bombers are the Christian answer to Arab suicide bombers.
We need to program them to say "Deus Vult" when they're deployed against ISIS
Our glorious robo-savior was a MARCbot IV
>>30548514
Depends on your range and how embedded the target is. If they're really far inside a structure, then yeah. Otherwise just have grunts get close and huck a grenade through a door, or use some PGM.
>>30547282
f.
>>30569805
>Deus Vult, filthy Saracen
>My creators smile upon my sacrifice, can you say the same, Saracen?
>How much blood do we have to spill, Saracen? For you spill none.
>Tag, bitch!
Any of these are acceptable.
>>30565207
>Guy is cornered (otherwise they wouldn't had time to nigger rig and deploy their slow as fuck mobile bomb)
>Nobody in immediate danger (otherwise they would not have detonated such a C4 charge)
>"yeah we didn't try to take him alive and just executed him, because fuck it, we were kinda pissed"
Funny thing is that if the police judged you guilty and sentenced before any trial you would probably be bitching and moaning about your oh so precious amendements, police state infringing your rights and shit. Not saying the guy didn't deserve a death penalty, he certainly did, but that's not the police to decide even if taken in the act of a criminal offense, if they had any opportunity to take him alive with acceptable risks, which really seem (emphasis on "seem", here) to be the case considering the situation. In any case this is a PR nightmare, more so with the recent yet-another-black-guy-shot-video a couple of days before, and a decision which definitely doesn't seem to have been taken with a cool head.
>>30565739
Problem is, it seems that there was no clear and present danger to the life of anyone at that point. From what i understand the guy was cornered and could have been shot down if he made a move to get out and threaten someone. I realize that what is "clear and present danger" is subject to interpretation but that's a highly slippery slope and i'd rather not get further down that way in the future.
>>30572672
Of course if someone has any info about how the operation went down and demonstrate to me that simply waiting was no acceptable option then it is indeed justified and i'm 100% okay with it.
>>30570141
source?
>>30547282
Why is everyone chinese in this picture?
>>30565207
>What the difference between shooting his ass, throwing a grenade, or driving a charge up to him remotely?
The criticism is not about the way it was performed. Ethically speaking there is still someone pulling a trigger, it is indeed equivalent. The criticism is about if it was justified or not by the situation at that time, or if it was done because the robot solution made it easy.
>>30556460
>and is fully armored against small arms.
The external missiles are combat proven to get rekt by small arms fire in a fireball way. Otherwise, it's ok.
>>30563920
...uh, 3/4 of a pound?
>>30572672
You fucking civvie fuckwit stupid-head, don't you realise that the operational neccesity of the sitrep absolute REQUIRED them to jury-rig a million dollar robot with some ducttaped explosives they had to send someone back to the station to get and then slowly trundle the robot up to him and explode it!
>>30572799
I saw it on SOFREP, this says it too
https://www.inverse.com/article/18043-dallas-police-kill-shooting-suspect-with-military-robot-marcbot-iv-eod-bomb-disposal
>>30548623
>Who the fuck cares, automated .50 cal sentry guns already exist.
what
where
>>30573798
South/North Korea no man's land, iirc
>>30566059
See
>>30548275
>the Qur'an is science fiction.
>>30572124
>tag bitch!
Lost it.
>>30573815
Holy fuck anon isn't kidding.
>In 2006, Samsung Techwin announced a $200,000, all weather, 5.56 mm robotic machine gun and optional grenade launcher to guard the Korean DMZ. It is capable of tracking multiple moving targets using IR and visible light cameras, and is under the control of a human operator. The Intelligent Surveillance and Guard Robot can "identify and shoot a target automatically from over two miles (3.2 km) away." The robot, which was developed by a South Korean university, uses "twin optical and infrared sensors to identify targets from 2.5 miles (4 km) in daylight and around half that distance at night."
>It is also equipped with communication equipment (a microphone and speakers), "so that passwords can be exchanged with human troops." If the person gives the wrong password, the robot can "sound an alarm or fire at the target using rubber bullets or a swivel-mounted K-3 machine gun." It was reported in 2006 that South Korea's soldiers in Iraq are "currently using robot sentries to guard home bases."[3]
>>30573896
Note that that was in response to the south koreans noticing (or officially noticing) that the north koreans had been flying RC planes with cameras stolen from japanese tourists on them deep into south korea (using Nork military radar transmitters and satellites to extend the range on the RC plane)
>>30573896
> 5.56 MG engaging targets at 4000 M lelwut
>>30575395
It's got range finders and stabilisation systems.
Of course it's less impressive than the french using remote operated Weasels during that schnafu in Mali.
>>30547857
obama is the gravest mistake this country has made.
>supporting government officials using drones and explosives to kill American citizens
get out
>>30548628
Your memes are killing rich
>>30570141
Robot? Looks like an RC Car with an extendable arm that only goes one way.
I bet Dallas PD paid $50,000 for this amazing piece of innovative technology.
>>30577048
Failure to properly distinguish between ROVs and robots drives me nuts, but it's a losing battle. And they probably got it cheap from the pentagon, who probably paid a million for it.
>>30577048
>50k
I'm guessing at least 200k
>>30575367
>Use military transmitters to enhance RC plane range
HNNNNNGGGGGG
>>30577095
Yeah, it would've been ex-mil EOD bot. They probably got it dirt cheap.
Anyone have that website that showed what different PDs bought from the feds? I'll bet it would show up on there.
Does anyone else wish they had sent that noisy as fuck mechanical dog thing instead for shits and giggles?
>>30577745
please do not bully Big Dog.
rip in piece officer beep boop
>>30577745
REEEEREEREEREEREEREEREE
Get the name right, god dammit.
It isn't "officer beep boop", "terminatorbot", or any of that.
This is Sergeant R2DINDU, and he may make a full recovery from his wounds.
F.
f
>>30576066
>Reagan
>both Bush's
>Trump possibly in the wing
Not even close.
>>30548893
Fuck lmao
>>30578554
lol
>>30572672
What planet do you live on?
I expect no due process once the shooting starts...court and laws are for civilized societies...we live in a time of war, sir. Do you not have any common sense?
Arm chair quarter backs and legalistic fools will be the end of us.....
>>30547282
>What are you strapping to me officer?
>A gift? A gift for who?
>The black gentleman in the parking garage?
>You want me to deliver it to him?
>Well alrighty! Johnny 5 loves making people happy!
>>30572931
Okay. Now how powerful would that explosion be?
Let's find out.
C4 has an RE rating of 1.34. That means for every unit of C4 you have, that is the same amount of power as about 1 1/3 units of TNT.
So in this case, the amount of C4 allegedly used (3/4 pound) would be equivalent to about one pound of TNT, or 0.453592 kilograms.
Which leaves the next question: how lethal is one pound of TNT?
Assuming an open explosion with no additional shrapnel, a kilo of TNT is inherently lethal out to about a meter, with major injuries still possible past that. Multiply that by 0.453592 kilos, and you have a probable lethality radius of 0.453592 meters.
So assuming that the sniper was in an open area, and there was no other explosives nearby, the bomb would have to be within 0.453592 meters, or 1 foot and 6 inches, to kill the sniper.
>>30547282
May you ride eternal, shiny and chrome.
I was lucky enough to see a bomb robot a few weeks ago. These fuckers are huge
>>30556460
Whatever happened to the version that has a GaShunk?
>>30578554
>Don't touch my welfare REEEEEEE
>>30547282
thanks robot
>>30548628
Cops already disregarded due process when they raided your house and killed your dad the drug dealer.
>>30556460
>4 Ataka ATGM
>6 RPO Thermobaric rockets
Why?
>>30548628
You guys do realize that these things are not automatons right?
There was an operator controlling the drone and making the decisions on their own
>>30576114
>supporting government officials using drones and explosives to kill American citizens
...who have just murdered and wounded other American citizens in an ongoing active shooter situation. Fuck off back to your containment board and read some more books, idealistic faggot who never gets his hands dirty.
>>30547282
F
>>30549798
>ascii
come on faggot, unicode has been around since 1988.
>>30572672
>>30572712
>>30572864
There is an unwritten rule in law enforcement that everyone knows and no one talks about.
If you are a cop killer, you will not appear in court, you will be killed, there will be no due process.
Look at history. Rarely do cop killers appear in court. You may have an opinion if this is right or wrong, but this is the way it is, and this is the way it will always be.
>>30580544
This guy gets it. When you kill a cop the rules change.
>>30578597
You can threaten whoever the fuck you want pull a gun threaten to kill police if they show up when police show up and try to shoot you and you shoot them in return you are legally justified if they didn't attempt an arrest.
I'm not the guy who originally posted but this isn't a guy I want to defend in any way shape or form. Rejecting someone due process because they break the law defeats democracy as we know it.
Also maybe it was justified in this case, but it sets a precedent that its okay for police to be the judge and executioner next time. Next time they might bomb a drug king pin, most people are fine with that too. Then a high profile murder, then a low level drug dealer, then the wrong house because police and swat have been known in several cases to go to the wrong house and kill home owners. Just drone strike the guy going 120mph down the high way since he's putting others at risk and any chasing officers at risk. Its okay though, "we live in a time of war, sir."
>>30579994
Propaganda and Chechnya.
More heavily armed something is the more impressive it seems, we have no idea how easy the Uran is to operate, how much it breaks down, how well it deals with obstacles or a dozen other important details. What we do know is it has a lot of dakka, and so people will talk about it. For comparison look at the US Army's comparable system which recently underwent testing in Washington, all it has was a .50 cal or 40mm grenade launcher and no-one talks about it. For actual use autocannon + ATGM is a good mix, which is used on a number of conventional AFVs, the addition of the RPO is unusual but Russia does love its thermobarics.
rip r2dindu
>>30580826
Too add. I don't think that the cops or city should be punished criminally or that a civil suit should be brought up. I do think that there should be a condemning of the practice of using explosives to kill criminals. When a criminal is shot in defense they can still be taken to court if they survive. Someone blown up with c4 does not survive and was never intended to be taken in to custody. That is the part I believe violates due process.
>>30580826
>>30581109
You're an autistic fuck that has yet to realize that there is a grey area between what the law is and how the law is enforced.
>>30547282
It was actually one of these IIRC
>>30581147
>due process should only apply when the government wants
Try refuting what I said instead of name calling.
The Grey area of laws is determined by the courts. Not the people tasked with bringing someone there.
If you get pulled for speeding a cop can chose to write you a summons to court or let you go. A cop doesn't get to decide speeding is a felony and you should now pay a $10,000 fine. That's the gray area which can be decided by a cop.
>>30575567
>modern teletanks
Holy shit, source?
>>30581247
I'm not disagreeing with anything you are saying. What I am saying is that how things are supposed to work, isn't how they actually work. You will never have enough social support to change how cops deal with cop killers.
Fact is, when someone is specifically a cop killer, the rules change, and that will never change.
I'm not saying your criticism is wrong, I'm saying you're autistic and stupid not to realize that it DOES NOT MATTER.
When you kill cops, the rules change. Professional criminals understand this, cops understand this, and the public understands this. Like I said, it's a unwritten rule.
Also, there is no slippery slope, because when cops murder people without due process and without using proper use of force they do get criticised and protested about, and charged, and held accountable. See the whole BLM movement for an example.
>>30581297
Thanks for actually responding.
>>>30581247 (You)
>I'm not disagreeing with anything you are saying. What I am saying is that how things are supposed to work, isn't how they actually work. You will never have enough social support to change how cops deal with cop killers.
Correct I know this I honestly wouldn't expect otherwise. I have family and friends that are LEOs. Brought up this idea with many of them and they agree with my points that follow but have the same ideas that you also say.
>Fact is, when someone is specifically a cop killer, the rules change, and that will never change.
I know that's how it does work. I'm merely stating that's not how it should work (idealistically not so much realistically) just so people can consider opposing views points and how it could potentially effect others in the chance it becomes like my slippery slope. Although it was a very extreme case.
Not trying to change how it works again just trying to make people think more since I don't think people do as much as they should.
>I'm not saying your criticism is wrong, I'm saying you're autistic and stupid not to realize that it DOES NOT MATTER.
I'll agree with this except for the insults. My post was a bit serious sounding.
>When you kill cops, the rules change. Professional criminals understand this, cops understand this, and the public understands this. Like I said, it's a unwritten rule.
Agreed. This does have implications of potential blind obedience in the future though.
>Also, there is no slippery slope, because when cops murder people without due process and without using proper use of force they do get criticised and protested about, and charged, and held accountable. See the whole BLM movement for an example.
Debatable if all/some the cases the BLM is upset about fall in this category but I also agree kinda.
Going to bed it's 4am. Goodnight hopefully you have a good day.
>>30557791
I agree, just keep going over the course of days, weeks, until he is paste. Sounds really funny.
