>he doesn't own any of the Arma games
What kind of fucking NEET are you?
ARMA 3 is ass. What were they thinking by setting it as a futuristic game?
>>30505816
I like Squad more to be honest. Arma is incredibly clumsy, only fun in PVP and to get PVP is a complete hassle.
But I do.
It's hard as shit to actually find playable multiplayer.
>>30505835
>doesn't know how to use mods
are you fucking retarded or something?
>>30505836
BF2: Project Reality is superior to Squad in many ways at the moment. Have you played it before? I'll probably switch to Squad once they update it to behave nicely with AMD cpu's.
>>30505938
No, never have, but I'm already content at Squad. I've played it for 155 hours and the game's in Alpha. It has by far the best gunplay of any FPS I've ever played and never in gaming have I been as satisfied with being gud as in Squad. Destroying a whole enemy squad by outwitting and outplaying them completely on your own is an amazing experience and I've never found it in any other game.
>>30505816
>ARMA
>Not Project Reality
>Not Insurgency
>anything mantioned above
>not planetside 2
NC traitors
>>30506326
Terran scum jealous of our tight, beautiful butts.
>>30506193
>project reality
>post standalone
It's ruined
>>30506348
>Implying tight beautiful butts are better then our strong fighter females that dont get raped everytime
>>30505844
>Having to mod the game to be more like its predecessor when the predecessor still has an active community
Pointless and stupid. Unless you play Zeus, A2 is a far more worthwhile purchase.
>>30506370
Last time I played, Vanu was dominating. By far the best faction. Terrans are mindless statists and the NC are mercenaries. Bunch of primitive dullards.
>>30505836
This. I like squad more than arma 3. That feeling when vehicles this month.
>year 2016 AD
>not buying into VR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZssqtbeijiM
>>30506348
Fucking no bullet drop no skill autistic bastards TR BUFF WHEN
>>30506483
>TR buff
Highest fucking DPS. Learn to aim, fascist.
>>30506405
A3 is all around easier to use, mod and actually seems to run better than A2.
A2 was only worthwhile when heavily modded anyway.
>>30505835
>>30506405
Can you really blame them for wanting to do something other than generic modern combat like they did for the past 4 games? They chose an art direction they thought would be fun to play AND develop. The overwhealming majority of things in ArmA3 are bleeding edge today and they got to take some artistic liberties. But none of that takes away from the gameplay or the realism in how those things perform and are implemented.
As for the modding thing, OFP and ArmA have always been intended to be mod platforms. There are plenty of mods that don't "just make it like ArmA 2".
>>30506406
Your lasers arent shit to our serperior good old physical bullets
Your tanj literally has to turn to his target to destroy it
You cant even shred sundys becuase you dont have vulcan
You cant win indoor fights because you dont have thr serperior rate of fire the TR has
You cant snipe us at long distances because your serperior "no bullet drop" doesnt work on guns that need it
You dont have the t4 amp
The vs are just influenced by shitty traitor leaders that prefer to cheat on the winning side instead of achieving great great victory
>>30506781
I don't really mind future shit in principle, but they didn't really do it in A3. It was just modern combat with a future coat of paint. No airburst weapons (there were in the beta, so I don't know what happened there), no VTOLs, no interesting new weapons, no exoskeletons of any kind, ultimately no real gameplay variation from previous games other than a greater prevalence of UAVs. Thankfully Apex is on the right track with its VTOLs, underslung .50s, stealth drone gunships and thermal masking suits, but it doesn't change that the initial effort was pretty damn piss poor.
>>30506862
Yeah, I do wish they finished the XM25 and KSG like they were showing off in the screens.
>>30506405
>A2 is a far more worthwhile purchase.
Except that the draw distance is not realistic and enemies can be seen and engaged over '500' meters away without magnification. The iron sight weapons pretty much have no bullet-drop.
>Rocking with FAL during co-op missions.
>FAL had burst though.
>>30507345
>FAL had burst though.
They seem to have fixed that at some point recently. Last time I booted it up, it had full auto.
>>30506360
Unfortunately, this. There's still some decent squads, but they're few and far between.
>>30506781
>But none of that takes away from the gameplay or the realism
>artistic liberties
>not by definition taking away of realism.
>>30507370
Uh, the Taki Army Ai had weapons fixed on auto or burst not semi much like the Rus-Militia faction in Redfor. Automatic mode or any automatic weapons shoots like a long burst of around 5 rounds. The FAL being that it is 7.62x51 would be even harder to control when firing auto, and it was at bust so soldiers only fired three rounds at a time in a behavior if someone were actually using NATO but were still a pretty inexperienced fighting force. I still found it that they run out of ammo faster then the Bluefor faction this way. Even if the magazines were 20 rounds, technically the soldier only has (4) shoot actions per magazine.
In Arma 3 every rifleman is fixed on semi while the autorifle or machinegun only does burst or auto up to three round shots when available.
So I'm thinking that they updated the AI for burst to no longer be stopgap as a more realistic approach to 7.62x51 full auto.
>>30505816
I only enjoy rpgs and eroges, fps are for normie fucks.
>>30507345
>enemies can be seen and engaged over '500' meters away without magnification. The iron sight weapons pretty much have no bullet-drop.
Bullshit, it's like you've never played ARMA2. And of course you can see and engage enemies over 500m, you just won't be any good at it.
>>30505816
They suck
>>30507439
>3D videogame
>Realistic
Everything works as realistically as you can expect it to. Lets not forget its a videogame. You're just mad because the developers didn't make the aesthetic choices you wanted.
>>30507568
Anytime someone actually takes the time to write "Uh" or "Um" to begin their statement, the entirety of their statement becomes worthless to me. It's like listening to a snarky 12 year old, even if the statement is entirely factual the tone is set.
