[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why does every vehicle made in the past 30 years look like shit?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
2016-07-01 20:56:37 Post No. 30468819
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: vehicles_now_then.png (1 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
vehicles_now_then.png
1 MB, 1920x1080
Anonymous 2016-07-01 20:56:37 Post No. 30468819 [Report]
Why does every vehicle made in the past 30 years look like shit?

I'm sure most modern military jets/ships are very efficient at what they do, but why do they look like absolute abominations?
Especially warships, they used to be great monstruosities of steel and iron with hundreds of guns and shit, and now they're just some long soft sleek floating planks
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:00:23 Post No.30468860
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:00:23 Post No.30468860 [Report]
File: fighter porn.jpg (1 MB, 3000x1996) Image search: [Google]
fighter porn.jpg
1 MB, 3000x1996
>he uses the Berkut as an example of a modern aircraft
>Berkut never saw production
>he doesn't use something beautiful like teen series fighters or F-22

PLS
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:03:43 Post No.30468884
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:03:43 Post No.30468884 [Report]
>>30468860
F-14 to F18 are actually nice
F22 is okay
F35 is awful
Drones are meh
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:05:37 Post No.30468904
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:05:37 Post No.30468904 [Report]
File: tips plane.jpg (2 MB, 3000x2400) Image search: [Google]
tips plane.jpg
2 MB, 3000x2400
>>30468884
>F35 is awful

Say that to my face and not online faggot.
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:07:13 Post No.30468926
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:07:13 Post No.30468926 [Report]
>>30468904
It looks too big to fly
It looks awkward
It's not even that useful
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:11:34 Post No.30468962
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:11:34 Post No.30468962 [Report]
>>30468926
>I'm....retarded?
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:13:34 Post No.30468981
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:13:34 Post No.30468981 [Report]
>>30468926

>it looks too big to fly

So should it fucking crawl or something?
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:14:28 Post No.30468987
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:14:28 Post No.30468987 [Report]
File: 1401852757728.jpg (2 MB, 2100x1500) Image search: [Google]
1401852757728.jpg
2 MB, 2100x1500
>>30468926
When did you first realize that you were gay?
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:41:35 Post No.30469271
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:41:35 Post No.30469271 [Report]
>>30468987
>>30468981
>>30468962
>>30468904


>4chan
>board about video games: everyone has shit taste in video games
>board about animes: everyone has shit taste about animes
>board about military equipement: everyone has shit taste about military equipement

Why am I not surprised
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:53:49 Post No.30469405
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 21:53:49 Post No.30469405 [Report]
>>30469271

It's not shit taste it's a genuine fucking question.

Is a Boeing 747 or B52 too big to fly?
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 22:10:11 Post No.30469596
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 22:10:11 Post No.30469596 [Report]
>>30468819
>>30468819
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 22:53:45 Post No.30470092
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 22:53:45 Post No.30470092 [Report]
>>30468926
It's smaller than the F-22, at least in terms of length and width.
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 23:10:45 Post No.30470299
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 23:10:45 Post No.30470299 [Report]
>>30468819
>mid-20th c.
>P-40

Quit cherrypicking and in a F-104 or SOVIET FAT BARREL-LOOKING FIGHTER NO. 4653
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-01 23:15:05 Post No.30470354
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-01 23:15:05 Post No.30470354 [Report]
>>30468884
The F-14 only looks good from the front and front-sides. Other than that the wings look like they're about to fall off at any point (like all variable swept wings) and from the top it looks like a cardboard rectangle with airplane parts glued in.

The F-18 looks like a heavily modernized F-5, which I love. Still doesn't look as clean as an F-16

The F-22's looks are perfect, clean and visually appealing, but it's too fuckhuge imo

The F-35 is a mistake. Just buy different planes and stop sucking Lockheed's dick, please.
>>
Anonymous 2016-07-02 01:50:55 Post No.30471982
[Report]
Anonymous 2016-07-02 01:50:55 Post No.30471982 [Report]
>>30468819
You have shit taste and a romantic view of war.
Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 4
banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.