>We need guns to protect ourselves from the governm-
>>30453829
Totally stopped these guys.
We need janitors to protect ourselves from this shitposting.
>>30453829
>OP thinks guerilla warfare is combated with your airforce
>>30453829
>implying the government wants to deal with the massive media, public, and political backlash of going full on Janet Reno
>>30453858
>this tard thinks his opinion matters
>the people defeated a tyrannical government here once we'll do it again!
>>30453829
Are you trying to say that we don't need guns, or are you trying to say that we need missiles?
>>30453854
Sauce on this?
>>30453849
there's this pesky little thing called the "Geneva Convention" keeping us from wiping them out completely
>>30453829
You should look up how a revolution works:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_Revolution
This is a textbook revolution, read into it and then come back.
>>30453829
>Doesn't understand the basic principles of asymmetric warfare
Also lets see the government pump out drones when the American economy quickly plummets when the insurgents start disrupting and demolishing the great American war machine from the inside its own borders.
>>30453877
How hard is a missile to make anyway? I mean, this is cold war tech.
I think most phones have gyroscopes and GPS.
>>30453865
>I made a really retarded statement about a subject I literally don't know anything about but maybe if I'll call him a retard he'll back away
>>30453829
>Hurr dumb gun nut can't defend against air strikes lololol
>Govt spends 8 million dollars per missile
>Govt tries to air strike revolutionaries to oblivion
>Govt goes bankrupt in 6 months
>Toilet paper worth more than the US dollar
>Revolutionaries win
>>30453892
nice post man!
Oh look, its this same thread from /pol/ too
GEE
>>30453891
forgot pic
>>30453890
>The US
>Giving a flying fuck about the Geneva conventions
Cute
>>30453829
>What is the Posse Comitatus Act?
>hey I know let's use small, fragile, jammable surveillance tools against the civilian population of the country that contains all of our defense contractors, NASA, SpaceX, and enough explosives to knock the moon out of orbit!
Yeah, nah. Saged for weak bait.
>>30453890
If you mean nukes, you're wrong.
>>30453896
Might be more economical to make a bunch of single shot HEAT rockets instead of targeting air vehicles. Although I'm not entirely sure how expensive and time consuming it'd be making homemade AT rockets.
>>30453919
you're right mr jones, we just aren't blowing isis off the face of the map in the 5 minutes we could because of globalist plots and shit not because it would get us in trouble
We had this shit last week and some knowledgable anons debunked that shit quick as fuck.
The government does not stand a chance against an organized revolution, however the problem is organizing the revolution itself so that everyone begins at the same time which is very hard to do since the threshold of some maybe higher than others.
>>30453829
>>30453875
Let's see that bote walk a beat in Sheboygan czeching the citizen's papers. Let's see if those drones can go door to door and confiscate guns in Tucson.
I'd like to see tanks try to provide close protection for collaborating state senators. When will district attorney's get MRAPs?
>>30453927
we could do i with predator drones too if we just stopped feeling the need for precision, if we stopped giving a fuck about the civs these cunts are hiding amongst we would be done with them in a week
>>30453849
Thinking ISIS and the Illuminati are enemies...
Not knowing the current year....
>>30453829
Gee Bill, your mom lets you have EIGHT Hellfires?
>>30453944
go start a revolution and see if towns don't just start getting frigged Me Lai style.
"checking for papers"
you make me laugh muh dude
>>30453938
summerfags are sure as fuck here.
Nigga, you don´t "blow muh isis off the face of the map lmao" because of the millions of civilians that live there.
but edgy underage b& faggots don't understand that kind of thing.
>>30453942
>however the problem is organizing the revolution itself
This. Despite having the beginning stages of tyranny, we live in a very wealthy society. Not many people are willing to risk that to preserve their rights.
>>30453951
You are massively overestimating the effectiveness of saturation bombing.
>>30453952
That's not even remotely the point.
>>30453979
what do you expect? Look at his rhetorics.
>>30453942
lol you serious dude?
how are your semi auto AR 15s gonna defeat attack helicopters 1km up?
>inb4 muhh .50cal barrett
>>30453951
>exterminate all living people in a region because some are terrorists
>he thinks this wouldn't have gargantuan political implications
>he thinks this would actually stop terrorism
I can tell you're from /pol/.
>>30453829
Can someone just take a screencap of one of these entire threads in a single image, so we can just paste it back every time someone uses this bait?
There's a dozen reasons it's retarded and every single one of them gets brought up every thread.
>>30454000
How are they going to get 1km up without fuel anon?
>drones don't cause massive amounts of damage
>drones wont kill innocents
>there would never be mutineers in the army
>drones are not extremely fragile
>all that expensive equipment is useless in a CQC urban combat situation
>the government will drop 1000kg on explosives on a citizens
It'll be surreal when drones go up against other drones.
"My drones are better than your drones!"
"Oh yeah?"
>>30454000
>how are your semi auto AR 15s gonna defeat attack helicopters 1km up?
Shoot the pilots' families.
>>30453972
>and see if towns don't just start getting frigged Me Lai style
That won't at all cause a domino effect, no sir.
Turns out that indiscriminately killing civilians is an unbelievably shitty way to combat an insurgency in your own country.
>>30453903
>Spamming the same thread we've had a quadrillion times already
>Using the same hackneyed, tired "LE DRONEZ LULLZ" without considering the repercussions of a full-on modern civil war
>Not providing any actual argument or reasoning, just an edgy soundbite
I'm going to assume this thread is bait, plain and simple; it's one /k/ falls for frequently. You are contaminating the board with your bullshit.
Now, pic related.
>>30454000
people tend to think we still live in an age where anything but who has bigger bombs matters
it doesn't. tactics mean nothing, numbers mean nothing if they can see your ass from outer space, what the fuck are you going to do?
techology is the sole decider of who would win a major war in the 21st century
>>30454016
considering the number of civilians the US government would be concerned about would drop to an amount that can fit in an exclusion zone it really isn't
>>30454000
You have absolutely no understanding of how a revolution or gorilla warfare works
Since english is not my native language I'll leave the explanation to some of the more knowledgable anons on here but you are delusional if you think the government stands a chance against a serious, organized revolution.
There are numerous examples (even in the modern world) of revolutions. Just read up on the subject.
The thing is: half a million armed militiaman can take an airforce base over night, not to mention the many deserteurs that don't want to shoot their own family and as such are capable of utilizing those assets or providing critical intel.
>>30454020
>it doesn't. tactics mean nothing, numbers mean nothing if they can see your ass from outer space
I'm sorry, are they gonna single you out in a crowd with a satellite and send an airstrike on you then and there?
>>30454020
That's why the US military wins all the time right? Every time. Not one defeat against farmers with outdated rifles.
> UAV's don't fly themselves.
>Just gotta find the people.
>>30453899
This anon gets it.
>>30454020
>Tactics don't matter
Last I checked using a piece of technology to accomplish a goal is a tactic.
>>30453921
I understand you are engaging in hyperbole but technically speaking, we humans do not yet have the capacity to knock the moon out of the range of vectors which result in stable orbits.
>>30454020
Please, don't spout shit you don't know nothing about.
Cringe.
>>30454026
>gradually kill the majority of the US population
>economy dies
>industry dies
>gov't now norkie tier because their flow of resources just kind of shrunk down to almost nothing because there's nothing to carry the nation anymore
They're retarded, but not THAT retarded.
>>30454031
>implying they would need to
you also forget that if anyone didstart a serious revolution the patriot act would be reinstated times 5000
if the satellite didn't work local cameras would
>>30454057
>>30454020
Don't I know you from somewhere?
>>30453890
That's the Hague Convention you retard. The Geneva Convention just protects uniformed soldiers from an established nation from being tortured. Those hajjis are defined as enemy combatants and therefore can be given "freedumz by CIA baptism"
>>30453829
We just need to form a Christian militia and get 100 T-34s
>>30454057
You're a fucking retard.
>>30454057
tell us about the chemtrails, too.
>>30454000
You don't You do guerrilla attacks on the military base and sabotage them before they even leave the ground.
>>30454015
The correct answer, btw.
>>30454020
He said, as we were tied up on multiple warfronts of fifteen years or better.
You need to check out the best thread on the subject of gorilla warfare. You guys are so stuck in the Second Generation Warfare mindset.
Watch and learn from an expert on strategy about how to defeat a technologically superior force.
>>30443812
>>30454000
>how are your semi auto AR 15s gonna defeat attack helicopters 1km up?
You don't, assuming you even have to fight choppers.
If the US population rose up against the feds, it would be the hardest guerilla war the US Army would have ever faced, no other guerilla force they have ever faced would ever have been so well supplied and numerous.
>>30454020
>US invades Japan
>Japan sees US armed forces 10 times stronger than them from outer space
>meanwhile at US command
>WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE GOING TO DO?!
They got drones,
We got drones,
All God's children's got drones.
We're going to fly all over the battlefield....
Cause all God's children got drones.
>>30453829
>>30453849
>>30453858
>>30453875
>>30453919
>>30454020
You guys all sound like you have no clue what you're talking about
if we did have a revolution, yes the rebels would probably win but you have to take into account that the losses on our side would be worse than the Soviets during WW2.
it's not like they're gonna just sit there and say "hey, be nice"
they will start dropping bombs destroying cities if the situation gets serious enough.
>>30454122
Nobody said a revolutionary war would be pretty or easy.
>>30454015
Deliciously accurate response
>>30454122
No, they won't. Because genociding your own population is ensuring you will get brutally tortured to death at some point in time. Also it's a certain way to drive a whole nation into ruin. I don't doubt some people in the government are willing to do this, but not all, and that is the big problem for the federals.
Why would they do large-scale operations that lead to exposure of the revolution to the not-so-informed public?
That leads to a huge boost in new recruitments.
The government will have to surrender rather fast, and if they are not willing - as a guerilla force you can just force them to.
>>30454109
No. The troll trolling /k/ is stuck in the second gen mindset. The rest of us are trying to introduce the hillarybot to Ltc. Thomas X. Hamm, USMC through a discussion of the practical points of how he (the troll) is wrong.
>>30453921
>NASA Space X defense contractors Pentagon bomb the shit that literally keeps them operational
All my kek friend
Here's the thing about dem drones.
Dem drones still have pilots.
Dem drones still have maintainers.
Dem POGs have dependents.
Dem dependents brag about dem POGs.
2 + 2 = ain't no drones no mo.
>>30454159
>he actually believes in the phrenology of military science
>mfw assigned to a defector enlisted soldiers manpad team to provide local terrain knowledge, safehouses, and cover
>>30454154
why on earth would they docilely let go of the nation they are going to lose anyway?
if you really think all you have to do is commit some terrorism and then they'll surrender you are hopelessly retarded
>>30454128
>>30454154
this faggot did literally two posts after you
>>30453829
>implying drone and tank operators are bulletproof
>>30453829
I can make one of those return to launch point on auto pilot with about $200 worth of stuff from radioshack and home depot
>>30454122
but we would win, isn't that worth it?
>>30454187
What does anyone's cranium have to do with gorilla warfare?
>unless you're talking ashtrays.
>>30454122
Go back to your containment board retard
>>>/b/
>>30454199
Well lets see the success checklist.
Bombing campaigns on civilians: 0
Number of revolutions:
Couldn't be bothered to count.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_revolutions_and_rebellions
>>30454199
No one says they will go quietly into the night. They won't resort to strategic bombing, though.
>>30453896
>I think most phones have gyroscopes
Accelerometers, not gyroscopes.
>and GPS.
All commercial GPS systems have a hardware limitation that will cause it to automatically power down if it exceeds a predetermined level of acceleration, altitude, or speed. It's there specifically to stop it being used as a weapon guidance system.
>>30454260
maybe not but bombing, but, heavy weapon assaults, a lot of problems we would have to deal with that won't be easy to figt off, possible to fight off yes but it wouldn't be a breeze
>>30454248
if it's so easy then lead by example.
no? just gonna sit here and be edgy?
k
>>30454242
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB632.pdf
Because this idea of "generations of warfare" is utterly unfounded, both logically and from the history its proponents continually misinterpret. It's is the same level of pseudoscience as phrenology.
>>30454262
>Accelerometers, not gyroscopes.
Well they works more or less close enough for a ghetto gyroscope.
As for the GPS thing I guess that would be tricky but I'm sure it can be worked around.
If not, a revolutionary could always use more traditional guidance systems.
>>30454239
not to me, I want a peaceful solution from the ground up, I'd rather keep my guns locked
if there were a revolution sure I would join in but I would not be as confident in ourselves as some of these people
Not even going to give this fuck nugget a (you)
Nigga, we would not bomb our own God damn cities for the same reason we haven't touched North korea: infrastructure is expensive as fucking hell. Why the fuck would a government say "I know, we'll trash the entire city, lay waste to its people, factories, businesses, utilities, and other key parts of the city, and then have to deal with sinking a metric fuckton of money into rebuilding all of the shit we just leveled without local labor since we killed them all?"
>this thread again
>>30454048
Kinda hard to maintain a stable orbit when you've been reduced to a debris field
>what are thermonuclear warheads
>>30453829
I'll say what I say in all of these stupid/bait threads.
If a bunch of sand-farming towelniggers can persist through it, I think a bunch of white first-world citizens will be just fine.
>I'll take guerrilla warfare for 800, Alex.
>>30453829
OP who has killed more people? Governments around the world or crazy individuals who shoot up gun free zones?
>65 million in the People's Republic of China
>20 million in the Soviet Union
>2 million in Cambodia
>2 million in North Korea
>1.7 million in Ethiopia
>1.5 million in Afghanistan
>1 million in the Eastern Bloc
>1 million in Vietnam
>150,000 in Latin America, mainly Cuba
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
>>30454286
It is a convenient metric for categorizing trends in conflict which typically appear together in roughly discrete time frames. The fact that technologies and tactics slowly evolve more often than abruptly shift isn't lost on us. That fact wasn't lost on the majority of martial conflict participants of note either. (The leadership of the first world war not withstanding.)
Discrete generations as a construct exist to assist in organizing thought and developing a general picture of the evolution of martial combat through the last three centuries. Not as fundamental laws of psychology or military sociology.
>>30454535
Actually, it's pretty easy.
>asteroid belt
Also, we have nowhere near enough ordinance on the whole of planet earth to even fracture the moon in half, let alone reduce it to anything resembling debris.
>>30453829
If the government has tanks and drones and nukes then why should they worry about my little guncase?
>>30454057
>My knowledge of government operations comes entirely from watching Bourne movies.
>>30454655
They aren't even roughly discrete. How do you explain Spanish Guerillas (4GW in 1GW world)? Or the Vietcong (4GW in 3GW world)? Or the Iran-Iraq war (2GW in 3GW world)? Or the extensive propaganda campaign of WW1 (4GW in 3GW world)? Or Grant's campaign in the West (3GW in a 1GW world?)
These aren't even corner cases on the edge of a "generation." These are different paradigms coexisting in the same time period, sometimes in the same conflict.
This isn't even getting into how these generations are slyly conflated into strategies.
It's like you read the paper and went "LALALALA! I'M NOT LISTENING"
>>30453829
Well since It says "arms" and not "guns", the disparity you've drawn only lends itself more to the case of owning more advanced weaponry, the reasonable folks aren't even advocating.
Instead with your weak shit-posting, you not only have revealed your power level to be prepubescent, but painted a clearer picture of your fantasy; no doubt some sort of partisan french resistance shit (probably looks like "rogue-one" in your head, this sound about right?).
Lastly what's most disappointing is your whining. Are you attempting to "shame" us into giving up our rights? Bitch please.
Just because you panic and poop in your pants/skirt/diaper/whatever at the first sign of real conflict, the rest of us aren't suddenly going to be attracted to you and your fear.
>>30453847
kek filename
MOLAN LABE
O
L
A
N
L
A
B
E
>>30454122
And I'm sure the mostly pro-gun military would have no qualms bombing their own families as well.
>>30454063
Holy God, do they think the Hubble actually has exposed lenses on both ends?
Nignog first. Then the govt.
The govt. didnt try to carjack a co worker then shoot another one for not having mug money.
>>30454256
underrated post, thanks for debunking the retard while I was afk
>>30453887
You're asking for sauce on a sprite animation? Fucking jesus dude, what is your obsession with finding information on every little thing you see that you cannot immediately identify? What are you cataloging it all for?
>>30454471
/thread
>>30455892
/pol/ isn't the brightest bunch.
>>30453829
A few guns and an old microwave oven and I could down that drone. Stop being a liberal idiot.
>>30454122
>the United States would bomb their own major metropolitan areas in the event of a major revolution
>>30453858
>he thinks guerilla warfare is not fought with drones
Are you from the 18th century?
>>30457086
>being this fat
>>30453890
>literal terrorists
>protected by fucking anything in international law
They're not a uniformed combatant, nor have they ratified the Hague or Geneva convention. We can literally do whatever the fuck we want to them outside of NBC warfare.
>>30453829
Obligatory.
>>30453902
Not to mention they won't be able to get new anything unless it is supplied by foreign nations.
>>30457182
Yeah, those drone bombings totally got rid of ISIS.
>>30457209
That hinges on the state not going to war with it's people, and it won't, but what do they do if the people go to war with the state?
>>30457562
Government looses either way. As the picture explained the US could be buttfucked logistically with very little effort. How do they maintain an armed conflict when we produce all their supplies domestically? Unless they are supplied by a foreign government they don't stand a chance. Also the Russians would supply us. Either way the losses on both sides would be WW2 era Soviet Union tier.
>>30455942
I just want to play the game.
>>30453944
Sheboygan, WI?
>>30454122
Good, maybe that'll drive home how serious this issue is to people instead of all the apathetic dismissive
>"lolbruh, you can't win against the government, besides, I still have my Starbucks so it's not bad bruh."
>>30454020
>all this cool fuck tech mang!
>drones, computers, missiles and shit!
>fail human relations
>fail human intelligence
>fail to understand what the fuck is going
>IED's everywhere
>successful attacks on military or local authority, no matter the scale, delivers blow to general population's perspective on how well things are going
>steady supply of insurgents because of continued military action that inevitably fan more anger
>PR-fucking-nightmare
>morale in tatters
and that's what will happen if the US Government ever tries to go hard on it's own citi-oh wait, that's what fucking happened in the Middle East.
>>30457881
This. We can't into counter insurgency even after 14 years, and that's against a bunch of uneducated sandniggers.
>>30454000
>implying I would use an AR-15
>implying I wouldn't use the shiny new Igla that Uncle Vlad gave me for being a good little revolutionary
you niggas don't know how to proxy war.
>>30454168
I know think you understand how information works.
>>30453829
>to protect ourselves from the
That's all I need. Carry on.
>>30453972
>Me Lai
You're a fucking idiot. My Lai was a result of goddamn Mcnamara following the classic liberal mindset of "soldiers are just dumb cannon fodder" and recruiting about 350,000 retards and ex-cons into the army. Look up "project 100,000". These poor dumb bastards also represented a disproportionate amount of our combat casualties, and are pretty much the reason the military in the 70's was such a shit hole.
Moreover, if you somehow convinced American troops to mass execute american civilians (How?), that would just pressure more people into fighting back. That's the exact opposite of how you combat an insurgency. In fact, one of the main objectives of a guerrilla fighter is to push the government into making such a disproportionate response.
>>30453829
oh look its the liberal wet dream. we gonna start bombing houses of suspected gun owners. sorry about that daycare center.
>>30453829
>thinking that most of the military wouldn't dissolve if they had to bomb their own families.
>>30453918
I dig that uniform. Basic yet professional.
>>30453829
>>30454000
with russian and chinese made anti-aircraft missiles, of course. what, you're dumb enough to think the chinks and commies won't flood US rebels with enough firepower to destroy the US military? After Civil War 2, Electric Boogaloo, they'll sweep in and clean up the survivors.
Fucking idiot.
>>30454000
If you don't think about a dozen other countries wouldn't bend over backwards to fly in assistance to the rebels you're fucking blind to how the U.S. operate overseas. I'll take out that helicopter with one of comrade Putin's shitty old Strela-3Ms that he'd donate to the cause.
>>30453829
Vietnam would like a word with you
>>30454262
>All commercial GPS systems have a hardware limitation that will cause it to automatically power down if it exceeds a predetermined level of acceleration, altitude, or speed. It's there specifically to stop it being used as a weapon guidance system.
Yeah, pretty much no off the shelf GPS chip out of China does this anymore.
>>30453829
wont happen. It would destroy the U.S. the moments it started. Desertion rates are estimated to be upwards of 70% in case of serious shit going down on U.S. soil. Soldiers would refuse to carryout orders and probably switch sides. Saboteurs in the form of sympathizers would fuck up shit. U.S. bombing its own people would be all over the news. Foreign parties would get involved. Etc Etc. Dumb argument by retards.
The rebel filth will likely be the minority and easily taken care of by actual American citizens. Fighting against the state simply means you're just another enemy of it and will not be provided the leisures of its protection. Real Americans will be quick to take up arms against those who threaten our freedom
The same way a cop has to qualms killing criminal scum, Americans won't bat an eye at killing rebel filth
>>30453829
Attack drone flight control rooms. I thibk theres one within 2 hours of my house. Kick in the door.
Yell "get on the floor."
Take over drones
Everbody walk the dinosaur
>>30461819
Boot licking cocksucker
Hang yourself, inbred mongrel
You don't deserve to call yourself an american.
>>30453829
>Implying I cant use a microwave and some tinfoil with a car battery and a few other secret components to take one of those things out of the sky
>>30461819
>Thinks killing rebels is defending freedom
That is some serious cognitive dissonance going on right there.
I would not want to be the US government if things went south here. Like sweet jesus.
>Sir, we've received news that approximately 100 power transmission and telephone poles have been dramatically destoyed!
>Jesus fuck, scramble the repair teams ASAP
>Sir, several of the repair teams have been fired upon,they're requesting military protection or they won't do their jobs.
>Okay, uh, guard them using local polcie and some of our men and
>Sir, the water treatment plant has been blown up! And several major roadways have been blocked with burning cars!
>FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU
How can you even BEGIN to deal with attacks on infrastructure? There is SO MUCH OF IT HERE AND NONE OF IT IS SECURED FOR SHIT! And if the state fails ot protect it, they wind up looking incompetent, and if they try to clamp down harshly, they alienate the people and further alienation and people joinging the ranks.
Also
>Uh,Mr. President? About 25% of the populace has just refused to pay taxes...s-should we arrest them?
>>30455942
Someone went and saved it in the first place, then had the thought to go and post it on a Lithuanian lithograph board. Not to unreasonable that another member would be interested as well.
>>30453829
Imagine the war overseas that we're already losing--that's essentially the same difference in firepower and its with the government at full power. Then add to that with every action the US military takes against the people, it simultaneously cripples it's own infrastructure. Then add to that the US unable to defend itself from outside opportunists. The American people might eventually lose the war, but the government would never win.
So I was thinking about it, if the US turned full on Gubbmit vs Civilians, what would /k/ be like? Would there be any form of a /k/ militia?
>>30463109
/k/ itself is technically both, you know.
>>30463209
Yeah, but how many /k/ milfags are willing to turn on the population
>>30453829
/pol/ pls
>>30454000
Ramzan Kadyrov will personally order convoys of Ural trucks, BMP's and various other slavshit vehicles to cross the border from Mexico (which suddenly has large SAM batteries guarding their border) to supply you with Igla's, kornets and other shit you might need to defend yourself properly.
The trucks will have white plywood around them to make them look like the white red cross trucks that bring rice and diapers.
>>30453919
If we didn't care about being "bad guys" the whole middle east wouldn't exist and the War in Afghanistan would've lasted four months with 35% of the population dead, jihadi and civilian alike.
>>30460126
No they wont. They might 'help' you reestablish some sort of a government but you can forget about US influence in the world for the next 40 years.
Its much better for them to kill the dollar and make a new one that the companies that are rebuilding will use to pay the workers.
Armed Rebellion in the USA would win very quickly. Not because how many of us there would be. Simply because there is too much for rich and powerful to lose in long conflict. where the government is trying for a Pyrrhic Victory.
Government would give up almost immediately. Concessions would be made to appease the rebels. The rebels would be happy, and kept happy until they are old and complacent. Then it is back to business as usual.
>>30455628
Think again
>Implying the Fed will attack its own people
>Implying anyone will ever rise up against tyranny.
Seriously, its not going to happen. When the fed tried to steal millions of dollars of a man's cattle: 100 people showed up. When the FBI executed a man for trespassing on federal property for two weeks, nobody gave a fuck.
When the DoJ wiretapped the offices of the AP, nobody gave a fuck. When it was revealed that the NSA is actively spying on ALL Americans, half of us cheered and the other half were silent. This week it was clear that our own State Department did nothing, letting four Americans be murdered by jihadists--after lying to us for 4 years about the circumstances, and I see nobody giving a shit.
Its not going to happen. 99% of "3%ers" or "sheepdogs" or even /k/tards with "g-grab muh SKS go innawoods!" Mentalities are complete fucking pussies who would never risk shit to fight tyranny. Hell, most would probably turn in themselves and their friends for a quick buck.
>not having an RPG-7 in case your asshole neighbor parks in your spot again
>not having an SAM set up in your front yard
>>30464584
anti air missiles are specifically banned in a post 9/11 anti terror law.
>>30453829
Because all of this technology has made us win all of our guerrilla wars with ease hasn't it?
>>30464589
Good think its an anti tank rocket, and not a missile.
