[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>Trijicon ACOG >good glass I fell for the meme /k/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 31
File: acog_200y.jpg (1 MB, 1534x1515) Image search: [Google]
acog_200y.jpg
1 MB, 1534x1515
>Trijicon ACOG
>good glass

I fell for the meme /k/
>>
I'm sorry.

I don't really get why people still buy ACOGs. There's so many better alternatives nowadays.
>>
I know nothing of scopes - what's wrong with the picture?
>>
>>30402137
I have one and so does my gf, no complaints. What's the issue?
>>
>>30402165
I feel the disparaging remarks aimed at the ACOG are largely from users who've failed to do their homework or were mislead. The ACOG is a great optic, but as with anything else, it's not perfect and it's greatness is limited to the narrow niche it fills. If you're looking for a low, fixed-powered optic that is supremely durable it's hard to go wrong with the ACOG. I love my 3x and 3.5x ACOGs, but I'm hesitant to recommend an ACOG to anyone who hasn't used one before, or even handled one.
>>
>>30402187
Excessive blur and fisheye along edge

Color discoloration (Might be OP's shit camera or just trying to look through the optic with the lens.

Hot damn I've never looked through one of these before, but I'm certain my $300 SWFA 10x42M has a better picture than this.
>>
File: vortexhs_200y.jpg (596 KB, 1030x1000) Image search: [Google]
vortexhs_200y.jpg
596 KB, 1030x1000
compared to my vortex that is half the price >:(
>>
>>30402165
List as many as you can.
>>
Often used by 11b; as was stated previously its durability makes it attractive and common for your team/squad leaders to have one while the dregs rock 68s.
Outside of the military I can only assume folks familiar with them would want them, given we have the free will to put whatever optic on whatever firearm.
>>
>>30402243
Why's the chevron dark in the first pic? Did you cover the fiber optic?
>>
>>30402137

>ACOG is a meme

kys. but give ACOG first
>>
>>30402264

When place on an object brighter than the illumination it reverts to black. It's one reason they are so awesome. They are always visible night and day and there is no lag in the transition from a dark indoor setting to a bright outdoor environment through a window.
>>
>>30402137
>>30402243
>Implying the ACOG isn't good enough to kill someone at that range.
>>
>>30402137
Zeiss Victory all the way.
It is expensive, but man is that picture nice...
>>
>>30402243
And half the field of view.
>>
>>30402331
>Implying iron sights wouldn't be good enough
You don't spend over $1k to be average.
>>
>>30402137
Supersetca hit the nail on the head:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzYyXlHIVlo
Combat pedigree is literally the only thing the ACOG still has going on for it. It has been surpassed in every other way.
>>
>>30402137
Looks good to me.

I'm not an optics connoisseur, what's wrong with it?
>>
File: 20151020_090630 (2100x1765).jpg (944 KB, 2100x1765) Image search: [Google]
20151020_090630 (2100x1765).jpg
944 KB, 2100x1765
>>30402137
acog reticle thread?
awesome
>>
File: lolcry.png (15 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
lolcry.png
15 KB, 400x400
>>30402663
>223
>1000 yards
>>
File: plebs.jpg (998 KB, 2094x2100) Image search: [Google]
plebs.jpg
998 KB, 2094x2100
>>30402718
>mfw i hit a 12x8" target at 1k with my 14.5" ar
i was so happy, took an entire mag but got 3 or 4 hits.

also, that is for the saw
>>
>>30402243
acog has wider field of view and no distortion to the edge of the glass

tl;dr you're just a really bad troll
>>
>>30402743

I got you to post, pencil dick.
>>
>>30402736
Dude wtf
>>
File: 20151020_090905 (2100x1346).jpg (827 KB, 2100x1346) Image search: [Google]
20151020_090905 (2100x1346).jpg
827 KB, 2100x1346
>>30402771
what?
>>
>>30402771
Just wait until he points it at the children!
>>
File: DSCF0749.jpg (2 MB, 3072x2304) Image search: [Google]
DSCF0749.jpg
2 MB, 3072x2304
>>30402137
Trijicon makes high quality glass for a high quality fixed power optic. there are better optics out there, but not with the same durability or the same physical size. the Spectre is a rattle trap with a weird mount that doesn't zero properly half the time. You typical Unertl or USO or NF has better glass... at half again more money and double the physical optic size.

I stick with Trijicon for fixed power and use a S&B for hunting. Zeiss has lost quality over the years but is still good. Nikon, March, and some stuff from BelOMO are all good buys. Hensoldt and Swarovski are kinda money sinks... but i have a S&B so i'm not one to talk about "not wasting money".
>>
>>30402791
Aiming at civies is a big nono
Even when unloaded
>>
>>30402820
no pics of kids, sorry.
>>
>>30402828
>Even when unloaded

Why?
>>
>>30402828
You do realize you can just aim the scope at someone while it's off the gun, right?

>>30402850
Booo!
>>
File: 20151020_085335.jpg (2 MB, 5312x2988) Image search: [Google]
20151020_085335.jpg
2 MB, 5312x2988
>>30402828
that's why i was aiming at a government agent.
>cops are civvies
eh, close enough
>>
>>30402828
>>30402771
Just report him to the FBI for what he's doing.
>>
File: 20151020_090403.jpg (2 MB, 5312x2988) Image search: [Google]
20151020_090403.jpg
2 MB, 5312x2988
>>30402897
this, 100%.
>>
>>30402771
>>30402828
>>30402897
>Any optic has to be attached to a rifle
You fucking idiots realize he can detach the optic and look out windows with it right?
>>
>>30402869
>You do realize you can just aim the scope at someone while it's off the gun, right?
In some places it is illegal to view someone through a magnified optic without their consent.
>>
File: giphy-1.gif (1 MB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
giphy-1.gif
1 MB, 500x375
>>30402897
>>
File: 1431535251392.jpg (2 MB, 4420x2252) Image search: [Google]
1431535251392.jpg
2 MB, 4420x2252
>>30402907
find the law

>>30402905
no, that's impossible
>>
Does this mean I should not buy a 3.5x35 acog for my scar 17s?
>>
>>30402905
see
>>30402869

>>30402907
Where, post examples.
>>
I had an ACOG with the fiber optic/tritium reticle, on my M16A4, when I was in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It beats the pants off irons and Aimpoints, when shooting past 200m.
>>
>>30402919
yup, op will tell you that a pa 1-4 is just as good.
>>
>>30402907
>In some places it is illegal to view someone through a magnified optic without their consent.
lol.
>>
>>30402919
No do the 4x
>>
>>30402907
Maybe in europe
>>
>>30402791
>how to get v&: the post
>>
>>30402937
I wouldn't mind that extra .5x but the 3.5 has better eye relief. I am considering the 6x48 but it's double the price, not sure if I want to pay it tbqf&h
>Inb4 paid for the Scar, won't pay for the optics

What are some alternatives? Apparently acog isn't the best according to this thread
>>
File: 1466740406250.jpg (431 KB, 1920x2560) Image search: [Google]
1466740406250.jpg
431 KB, 1920x2560
>>30402967
>tfw still not v&
>>
File: 1410005320444s.jpg (2 KB, 125x93) Image search: [Google]
1410005320444s.jpg
2 KB, 125x93
>>30402953
>Mfw I'm looking across the Channel at France through a pair of optics joined in the middle.
>>
>>30402972
what do you want out of the optic?
uses?
>>
Any reason to get an acog when trijicon 1-4x optics exist?

Considering the accupower
>>
>>30402974
Personally, I love seeing pictures through scopes/iron sights. I think it's cool as shit but I wouldn't post that shit on the internet. Especially with a recognizable building in the picture
>>
>>30402974
They'll steal pb's one dog and make her bite your dick off in retaliation.

>>30402976
You done a bad bad thing.
>>
>>30402999
>eh, at least i won't get awkward boners anymore.

>>30402992
i do it for you.
i do it for free.
>>
>>30402918
>>30402921
>>30402933
>>30402953
Source: I heard it on an episode of Kenny vs. Spenny.
>>
>>30402984
Hmmm idk I wanted to be able to hit 600m+ but still have versatility for closer targets. I'm military fag who's used iron sights except for once I told the armorer to give me an acog, so I have used one before. Not much experience with scopes- have shot a few of my buddy's scoped rifles but not much

The scar is super accurate so I figured I'd have some magnification on my optics, would be a shame to put a 1x on it.
>>
>>30402826
Is that one of those H&K semi auto hunting rifles?
>>
What is the purpose of an ACOG? What's the advantage over something like a red dot optic?
>>
>>30403027
if you can part with the money, nightforce makes really good optics at not too crazy a price.
get something that goes up to 12x and a mini rds like a burris fastfire.
>>
>>30403037
Bomb-proof fixed 4x with a no battery lit reticle set to your ammo type. Once you zero it, it's good for a very long time, even if dropped.
>>
File: DSCF0742.jpg (2 MB, 3072x2304) Image search: [Google]
DSCF0742.jpg
2 MB, 3072x2304
>>30403033
yes.
>>
>>30402165
Like?
>>
File: scope_1.jpg (110 KB, 1000x750) Image search: [Google]
scope_1.jpg
110 KB, 1000x750
>>30402992
>Personally, I love seeing pictures through scopes/iron sights
Before.
>>
File: scope_2.jpg (64 KB, 1000x750) Image search: [Google]
scope_2.jpg
64 KB, 1000x750
After.
>>
>>30403073
>even if dropped
or shot. still functional as well, although frozen and unable to be adjusted.

http://catholiclight.stblogs.org/index.php/2004/11/meet-todd-bower/
>>
File: scope_3.jpg (133 KB, 1000x750) Image search: [Google]
scope_3.jpg
133 KB, 1000x750
This is through my Prem Ret boosted Leupy (18-40x).
>>
>>30403050
How much should I spend on a good scope?
>>
>>30403126
it depends on the abuse it will take and how nice you want it to be.

minimum for a non-safequeen scope should be 3-400 with higher power demanding higher dollar.

if you want a scope that has positive adjustment, clear glass, good reticle, and will be bomb proof.
expect to pay $1k for the lower end on a 1-4 and $2-3k for 12+ magnification.
>>
>>30402880
>I recognize this building
HARVEY OSWALD GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>30403126
$8000-$15000

Go for the full NV/Thermal shit. Be a true /k/ommando.
>>
>>30403155
Aimpoint is what I'm saving up for.
>>
File: woah.jpg (835 KB, 1888x916) Image search: [Google]
woah.jpg
835 KB, 1888x916
>>30403159
wrong building, but thanks, i just realized i drove down the same street jfk fot assassinated
>>
>>30403207
i wasnt saying that was the plaza
i was saying OSWALD GET OUT
OUT OUT OUT
TAKE HIS COAT

why do you have an optic with you at work?
>>
>>30403126
Get a US Optics ST-10 and thank me later
>>
>>30403237
that was vacation, i live in nc
>>
>>30403250
oh. did you stop at the museum there?
>>
>>30403274
no, i only stopped to sleep, on my way to the desert(nm,az,nv) to shoot guns.
>>
>>30403274
Texas is known for steers and queers. He was there for latter.
>>
File: P1.png (874 KB, 786x522) Image search: [Google]
P1.png
874 KB, 786x522
>>30402736
Was this taken from this hotel?
>>
>>30402974
how soon before someone shoops a cock into that photo?
>>
File: 1466900821275.png (598 KB, 784x510) Image search: [Google]
1466900821275.png
598 KB, 784x510
>>30403390
yeah

>>30403397
nah, gun is better
>>
File: TA11-D-100293-2.jpg (117 KB, 800x800) Image search: [Google]
TA11-D-100293-2.jpg
117 KB, 800x800
I got an AR recently and wanted an optic for it, was looking at pic related. Does anyone have any thoughts? Reading the eye relief on the TA11 is much better.
>>
>>30402243
now go throw the vortex and the acog down a flight of stairs and see which is the better optic
>>
>>30403485
>Does anyone have any thoughts?
i don't have experience with the ta11 but if it's basically a ta31 with better eye relief, it's a great choice.
>>
>>30402137
As a photographer; holy shit that is some shit glass
>>
>>30403207
We neighbors, nigga. I was down there earlier today lol.
>>
>>30403857
let me shoot your aug. I want to buy one but not sure if I will like bullpups.
>>
>>30403753
as a former infantry soldier, telephoto lenses make absolutely shitty rifle optics.
>>
>>30403970
Glad to see that army education taught you something that is cripplingly obvious to anyone who has ever used a camera. Camera lenses aren't designed for shock and vibration.
>>
>>30403074
Handsome set up
>>
>>30403753
As a photographer, holy shit you have some shit glass
>>
>>30404078
>>30403753

>taken with an iphone 6 without a tripod
>>
>>30404078
That doesn't even make sense
>>
>>30404116
It was never meant to
>>
>>30402880

Edgy mc. Edgelord pls go
>>
>>30402974
Bcm poster....stainless barrel....magpul sights..operator beard.....this guy holds the keys
>>
>>30402663
what acog model is that? that reticle is sweet as shit
>>
>>30404334
ta31 ecos
>>
>>30404394
thanks

do you like it? Im definitely considering an Acog these days
>>
File: 20160525_220053.jpg (874 KB, 3264x1836) Image search: [Google]
20160525_220053.jpg
874 KB, 3264x1836
>>30402663
Guess this one. Hint - I'm not holding it upside-down.

I'm not a robot
>>
>>30402791
Did you enjoy your stay at the Omni Hotel?
>>
File: rsz_img_0060.jpg (1 MB, 1512x1512) Image search: [Google]
rsz_img_0060.jpg
1 MB, 1512x1512
I like mine
>>
>>30402974
Pull the trigger
>>
File: image.jpg (1 MB, 3264x2448) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1 MB, 3264x2448
>>30402919
accupoint 3-9
>>
>>30403017
ha, i remember that one
the ones where kenny loses because of his own fuckup seem to be the funniest.
>>
>>30404410
i love it, crosshairs are my favorite and the bdc works well.

>>30404469
yeah, nice room but no ficki ficki, the whore house in navada cost more and the room sucked but i at least got my dick wet.
>>
>>30402137
Given the shitty cell phone camera that was taken with, it looks pretty god damn good to me. Zero perceptible chromatic aberration, no visible parallax, no blurring, reticle is razor sharp. What exactly is the complaint here?

Instead of shitting on a known phenominal optic with a three-decade-long pedigree, maybe you should get your eyes checked. If you have myopia, hyperopia or especially astigmatism it can affect what you see.

>>30402243
This on the other hand has visible chromatic aberration on the highlights.

>>30402165
Please, list several. Or just one.
>>
>>30402791
A B S O L U T E

M
A
D
M
A
N
>>
>>30402791
daily reminder that pointing a weapon at someone is assault by pointing a weapon m8 at least in NC, and I know you live in NC. Might want to think twice about doing stupid shit and taking pictures of it
>>
>>30402210
>Excessive blur
Because that totally isn't just OP's shittastic camera.
>and fisheye along edge
Why is that even an issue? It's barely there.
>>
>>30405162
>G.S. 14
>§ 14-34. Assaulting by pointing gun.
>If any person shall point any gun or pistol at any person, either in fun or otherwise, whether such gun or pistol be loaded or not loaded, he shall be guilty of a Class A1 misdemeanor.

>pointing a gun at yourself is a crime

heuheuehuehuehuehueuhe n1 carolina.
>>
>>30405162
What says he has it attacched to his rifle? He's literally using a monocular to look around the city doing this.
>>
>>30405162
>and I know you live in NC.
1337 doxxer, how did you know i live in nc?
MAGIC
A
G
I
C

>>30403250
>>
>>30405225
Suicide is a crime in most states too, believe it or not.

Society, man. Anarchy or bust, eh?
>>
File: Canadian_C9A1_LMG.jpg (3 MB, 3216x2136) Image search: [Google]
Canadian_C9A1_LMG.jpg
3 MB, 3216x2136
How's the eye relief on the usgi "acog" whichever model it may be. I only have the canadian c79 elcan to compare it to, and the elcan is dogshit.
>>
>>30405787
1.5"
>>
>>30405787

The TA-31F 4x Magnification has shitty eye relief
>>
>>30402663
>>30404555
what are yall using to take some good scop pictures?

everything is in focus so well, no real grain or blur
>>
>>30403485

I got a TA11 first then a TA31 for another rifle. I hate the TA31.
>>
>>30405865
galaxy s5 and multiple pics
>>
>>30405805
So it's even worse that the elcan? God damn it's horrible.
http://www.armament.com/specter-m145
>>
>>30405897
yeah, once you get used to it, it's no big deal. i think the fantastic fov helps out.
>>
File: 20160619_203447-1024x576.jpg (210 KB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]
20160619_203447-1024x576.jpg
210 KB, 1024x576
>>30405787

It fucking sucks, at least with a fixed stock. I have to Jennifer Love Hewitt my neck to get a full sight picture. The TA11 is tits though.
>>
>>30405931
>>30405931
>The TA11 is tits though.
>2.4"
>tits
>c79 has 2.7"
>I think it's horse shit
What the fuck /k/, what are some scopes with really long eye relief. Is that the point of "scout" scopes?
>>
>>30405965

Don't be a manlet?
>>
>>30405977
How is it relevent though, I'm 6' tall.
>>
Hey /k/
I am looking to shoot coyotes at night and during the day. Is there a good day night optic out there for under $2k?
>>
File: 50604308.jpg (99 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
50604308.jpg
99 KB, 400x400
>>30406007
>I'm 6' tall.
>>
>>30404555
Where ever that was taken I want to go to there
>>
>>30406055
That is a rather pleasant looking hill.
>>
>>30406055
>>30406076

That is Mt. Rubidoux in Riverside, CA. Its pleasant till you realize 90% mexicans live here
>>
>>30405865

iPhone 6S
>>
>>30405787
Larue LT681 can help move it back if you need. It's worked quite well for my TA-31
>>
File: 1464044319072.jpg (103 KB, 534x460) Image search: [Google]
1464044319072.jpg
103 KB, 534x460
>>30406108
>Riverside
Fuck that, no thanks.
>>
>>30406135

Extract me to freedomland pls
>>
>>30403753
>handheld smartphone pic
>can magically tell a known good optic is shit

Get fucked idiot.
>>
>>30402620

Wow, that was really good.
>>
>>30402620
good video
>>
File: fbi.jpg (51 KB, 974x269) Image search: [Google]
fbi.jpg
51 KB, 974x269
>>30402791

This is not even funny. Why would you do this? Doesn't matter if it's not on the gun as you most likely have no proof that it wasn't attached. Either way it's wrong.

Have fun getting v&
>>
>>30402791

lmao wow.
>>
>>30402137
If you don't like it, I'll do you a favor and trade you my brand new Aimpoint PRO for it.

I know the market values are off, but your ACOG is obviously such shit that I'm really doing you a favor.
>>
>>30402861
Rules 1&2 you fucking nigger
>>
>>30402905
If someone posts a picture of rifle iron sights, you assume it's attached to a rifle. If someone posts a picture of another rifle sight you assume the same.
>>
>>30407292
you know what happens when you assume? YOU LOOK LIKE A STUPID FUCKING FAGGOT
>>
I like ACOGS but my eyesight is so shitty that I cant focus on the reticle
>>
>>30406988
we need more of these for every corrupt politician there is.

>it was just photoshop officer
>>
"Hey Bill, it's those stupid faggots from 4chan again"
"What is it now?"
"This one faggot says another faggot was pointing a rifle at other people"
"What's it look like?"
"It looks like the faggot is using an optic as a telescope"
"Ignore it"
>>
>>30407292
I'm not even hasguns and I instantly assumed it was detached.
>>
>>30402210
Holy shit dude if you think this image is a problem you are full on autistic. Go get checked. Ive shot through scopes that are barley under 1k and havent got this good of a FOV.
>>
>>30407313
I feel you anon, I cannot use peep sights to save my life.
Never used an ACOG but most other optics have worked well for me in the past.
>>
>>30402247
>>30403076
>>30404958
Any variable power 2-7x scope. Literally any. Get a Leupold or something.
>>
File: darwin-award-007-12232013[1].jpg (211 KB, 615x461) Image search: [Google]
darwin-award-007-12232013[1].jpg
211 KB, 615x461
>>30407338
maybe that's why

>>30407299
>>
>>30403653
Or do the same with the Vortex Razor HD 2 1-6x which is actually a reasonable comparison?
>>
File: sniper_shot2_292.jpg (54 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
sniper_shot2_292.jpg
54 KB, 600x450
>>30406988
here's hoping i actually get a visit from the fbi
Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 31

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.