Tankettes yes or no?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Tankettes yes or no?
Possibly
>>30032935
Perhaps
could be
>>30032935
Yes
Pretty good for rushing poorly defended positions in wargame
>>30032935
Yes. But only for scouts.
>>30032935
Looks like advance wars
>>30032980
That's pretty sweet I want one for deer hunting
Could tankettes armed with 30mm cannons make Stryker brigades worth shit besides under armoured out gunned apcs?
>>30032935
Yes
The Weisel and this should have playdates.
>>30033056
No. The Stryker brigades need larger firepower and there's not enough MGS in the Army for that role. The Carl Gustavs taken into service will help that somewhat, but they still need more, which is what the US military is doing. There's the project whose name I can't remember that's about designing or finding a IFV with a large caliber gun, that can both destroy tanks and provide efficient fire support.
Can you repeat the question?
>>30033083
Is that a railgun?
yes
>>30033130
Just an autocannon with a weird shroud.
If the US Navy cant even into railguns why on earth would the Russians be able to put one on a tankette?
maybe if you put wings on it
>>30033134
>>30033113
Wouldn't integrating a more traditional lav derivative similar to the Lav 25 be able to have similar armor and firepower as a Bradley while only losing the ability to float, which the Stryker can't do either?
A tankette should at minimum protect against a rifle thats shoulder fired. IMHO
So, yes on a tankette, but one the size and protection of a scorpion, but downgrade the gun for 30mm.
>>30032935
If we put wings on them, they will be much more useful and we can retire helo's
Yes. Tankettes are love, tankettes are life.
>autoloaded 90mm, twin 30mm, 4 ss.11 or 2 ss.12 ATGMs.
I'm still salty it didn't enter production
>>30032989
>only for scouts
Isn't the Ozelot used as a regular AA-platform?
>>30033861
Fun fact, these french tankettes were designed to be less tall than wheat fields in case of a conflict against soviet armored division on the Fulda gap.
>>30033462
...so, the Stryker MGS?
>105mm cannon
>LAV-25 derivative
Been dun befo'
>>30033861
>tankette
>bigger than an M113
...not really what I'd call a tankette
>>30033359
shirow pls go
>>30033319
Because?
>>30034349
>muh Fulda gap
>>30032980
>>30032989
so when krauts arent building super efficient battle-tanks they just build CUTE things?
>>30034561
they are super effective
>paratroopers land behind enemy lines
>with tankettes (20mm auto-cannons/stingers/TOW/120mm mortars)
>easy as fuck to deploy and get out again
>they can get to woods thanks to their small size
>with enough armor to withstand 7,62mm and shell splinters
>they will harras the shit out of your supply lines and fuck up HQ's/Artillery Positions/Radar stations and AA batteries
you can get 4 to 5 Wiesel1 or 3 Wiesel2 for the weight of a single BMD3/4 which translates into a lot more takka/situation awareness and area (to be able) to cover
>>30034468
>Lasers are related to railguns guise, it's all energy weapons after all!
Go die in a ditch, boris
>>30032935
What aboot ATVs and snow machines with GPMGs?
Call them Grizzley Cubs, eh?
>>30032988
Too bad they had shit autonomy. Leopard 1A1s were better for kraut Zerg rushing.
>>30035282
>>30032989
>>30032980
those tracks are so narrow though
>>30034468
>the jewish magic show to fool the tax payers to justify them paying for $10000 for a hammer is real
wow, are all burgers this easy to get money from?
>>30032935
Yee. I like tanks, and tankettes allow them to go places they normally can't.
>>30035359
>when confronted, he only memes
Typical slav behavior
>>30032935
Make them modular with different weapons like the poles did, or make it so you can stack them atop each other to make a towering pillar of tankettes
>>30032935
How useful would these be if they were used in WW2 with all the modern equipment they have.
>>30035973
Just the TOW variants alone would be some of the greatest anti-tank weapons in the world.
>>30036016
the greatest anti take weapons in the world are jets
>>30036031
Just sit there and think about what you've said. You'll come to the same conclusion I have: that you're retarded.
>>30035393
Well considering they weigh less than 5 tons makes sense.
>>30032980
>>30032989
>>30033083
Can slightly bigger brother come out to play?
>>30038229
>>30038239
>Wiesel= 10,000 lbs
>FV 101= 20,000 lbs
>Stingray light tank= 51,000 lbs
Payload of an:
>Osprey= 20,000 lbs
>CH-53= 30,000 lbs
>Bell V-210= 10,000 lbs
>>30032935
There's a chance of yes or no.
>>30033359
{{Shirow pls go}}
