>ramp on the front
literally more retarded than BTR-80 side hatches design
>>29922183
won't that compromise the armor?
>>29922188
its probably only a lightly armoured apc anyway. i'd chuck a bullbar or ram on the front so you can punch through walls and deploy your troops
>>29922188
it's there to refill the armor
geddit
cause it's russian
well how else will you manage to assault out of it?
Why the fuck would you do that
lightly armored battletaxi or not, you put your strongest armor in the front, and you stick supporting infantry behind if it they really need cover or to get shit out of the vehicle.
Doesn't make any sense to put the hatch in the front at all
>>29922183
looks like a retarded duck
>>29922254
Centurion is one ugly tank after all
>>29922229
I came here to post this, but i'm hardly surprised someopne already did.
>>29922183
Needs forward facing frag and smoke grenades for assault. Oh and of course dismount in heavy armor. Pic vaguely related.
>>29922337
you dont mean that
>>29922220
>cause it's russian
>The King Abdullah II Design and Development Bureau (KADDB) unveiled the latest version of its heavy armoured personnel carrier (APC), the Al-Dawsar, at SOFEX 2016 in Jordan.
You're retard
>>29922183
Maby it's french and the heavy armor is on the rear?
>>29922183
The side doors are awesome, fuck off.
>>29922942
xD epic le french surrender monkeys maymay br0!!!11!!1!! ;P
FUCK. OFF. FAGGOT.
>>29923111
Kek nyet, comrade.
Even the russian finally realize that they've made a mistake (after like, what? 40 years), and finally replace side hatches with rear ramp in BTR-87
>>29923135
Holy shit this asspain! Calm down bro
>>29922942
>>29923135
>>29923135
honhon le baguette
>>29922183
Uhh
>>29923135
>>29924011
God, these things are so creepy with legs.