88 or 75
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
Which is the good one and which is the meme one?
Neither are the meme one... Why does one have to be a "Lel meme" one? You're a faggot
>>29809201
They were both sufficient for their intended roles.
>>29809201
i swear you retards have no idea what meme means anymore
>>29809201
They were both shit
>>29809201
Stugg was best tank and also best meme tank.
>>29809788
It has a secondary definition now. Get with the times brah.
>>29809201
the 88 was the good one, the 75 was a meme.
they both had similar penetration but the 88 would cause more damage.
>>29809931
Neither were a 'meme' you fucking autist.
Both had different roles that they filled well enough in terms of armament. Panther was a Medium tank, Tiger a heavy. Armament was appropriate for their classification.
Stop saying 'meme' like it actually means something.
88
because it sounds nazi.
The 88 was probably more effective for infantry support, otherwise the 75 was superior in anti tank warfare, due to more penetration and higher shell velocity.
>>29809931
75 was great for AT purposes, though lacking in the HE department. Still both good guns.
Hachi Hachi wa shit
I played Panther 2 in WoT and it was shit.
>>29810282
I played WoT and it was shit.
I remember reading somewhere that allied tankers feared the Panther's gun more. Was it real or urban myth, that I don't know.
>>29809201
Both were good, autists who sperg saying that one is a "meme" are retards who don't know what they're talking about.
>>29809788
Now meme also seems to mean "popular thing that is shit."
Oh wait, no, the definition appears to be the same.
>>29809201
Both could kill any tank of the war just fine, but the 88 had an actually good HE round.
GERMAN SCHHTEEEEEL
>>29809765
The long 75 on the Panther was not sufficient for its intended role. The HE load was too small and so it struggled to deal with infantry.
>>29809765
>They were both sufficient for their intended roles.
Which was losing the war
>>29809931
But the 75 still had better penetration characteristics at range. On top of that it could be fitted on a tank with a smaller turret ring than the 88 and required less time and resources to be manufactured than the 88 was.
>>29810419
>Oh wait, no, the definition appears to be the same.
