Get a Primary Arms at the minimum, Vortex if you hate good reticles and have money to spend
Better reticle, better glass, better warranty

>>29775058
I have one and while it's pretty decent my biggest complaint is the eye relief. You have to look through the scope just right or else you won't get a good picture. Your eye relief basically has to be perfect where as some scopes are a little more forgiving and you can still acquire a good picture even if your eye isn't the exact right distance from the lense

>>29775108
known as the eye box

I mean there are far worse options, but considering you're probably not a Tier-Negative One operator it will good for your application.

Which I'm assuming is plinking, the occasional longer distance (>100yds) shooting, possible hunting/hog extermination/coyote removal.

I mean this scope is good for all of those things except for longer range shooting and home defense. Its also reasonably priced and Nikon has a decent rep. Fucking buy it.

>>29775058
I have one on my 25-06. It is lovely and bright and clear.

I still maintain that a Burris is the better scope for the money. Lifetime warantee, etc.

>>29775116
Don't fucking correct me you little bitch cunt

Nikon optics SHOULD be superior to primary arms trash, but they don't use their really nice coatings on scopes AFAIK.

I have several pairs of nikon binos and the image quality is just breathtaking

I used one of their P series (their cheapest I think) scopes for a bit. It was decent. I had no issues with eye relief, since it was setup right and having a consistant checkweld helps. Clear picture IIRC.

I've only used close range stuff though, out to only 100 yards.

>>29775058
I bought one of these. well made as Nikon should be. there is a wealth if ballistic information to go with the scope on their website, ballistic calculator and such.

I just got my first ak, and am thinking of putting a simple scope on it. What's my best bet for $100 or less?