M1A2 American garbage will never ever compete against the leopard 2a7
BURGER GO HOME AND EAT LARD CRYING
K. keep me posted
Call me again when the Leopard actually sees real combat
>>29735243
there is only one tank on earth that US military considers a challenge for the M1A2 just to give you a second hint it's britsh.
>>29735338
What do the bongs have again? It's the Challenger, right?
the iranians own you both
>>29735243
>Iraqi's retain one (1) M1A1
>Not even M1A2 with improved battle systems / armor
>Using said tank against Daesh in Hit, IQ
>Daesh getting the fuck beat out of them daily
>Can'tstoptheAbrams.jpg
>Kills so many Deash and powers through so many shaped charges / RFPs / RKGs / RPGs that it's basically a myth
>Earns nickname "The Beast"
>Fucks up Deash at ludicrous speeds
>American advisors think Iraqis have multiple tanks in Hit because it moves so fast and kills so much
>Nope, just one Abrams
>Earns Hero Of The Day award day after day
Fuck your Leopard. Once it has a proven resume like the Abrams, we'll talk.
>>29736487
is that a m60 with a soviet turret?
>>29736561
>George W
Abrams can play tennis.
Your arguments are invalid.
>>29736609
yes
>>29736673
how and why?
>>29736487
what the even fuck is that ?
holly shit my brain is full of fuck
hull is clearly m47
turret seems to be from t-54, but thats not 100mm, looks more like 105 from Chieftain with metal thermal sleeve
thanks iran you just fuck my shit up
>>29736711
fuck me meant gun from m60
thanks iran
>>29736631
Kek
>>29736711
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/iran-unveils-main-battle-tank-180105847.html
>The tank appears to have the main hull and engine of the US' M47M Patton, a variation of the M47 Patton made in the early 1960s, and the turret of China's type 59/69 tank, first produced in 1958.
The Tiam sports a 105mm rifled main cannon
good eye
>>29736416
No idiot it's the T-90 jeez
>implying any tank got shit on this beaut
>>29737122
Is that for deer hunting?
>>29736561
>blowing out sandniggers with 50s tech is impressive somehow
>hypothetical in-theory alleged NATO tank vs NATO tank threads
>Tank on tank in modern combat
>two thousand and sixteen years after the death of our savior jesus christ
>>29735243
>BURGER GO HOME
He said on an American imageboard while dickriding a piece of machinery from the people who started 2 world wars and won neither.
>>29737208
>never being used in any conflict ever is somehow impressive
>not having any sort of hard or soft kill protection is somehow impressive
>not having a 1,500+ horsepower jet turbine engine is somehow impressive
>>29737158
its obviously super stealth tech
>>29737319
>>never being used in any conflict ever
I guess the war in Afghanistan is a garden party?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_2#ISAF.2FOEF
>>29738614
>literal THOUSANDS of Abrams deployed effectively in foreign countries
>28 Leo's used for patrols for less than a year
your source even goes as far as to say they were not used in any fighting
>" A Leopard 2A5 was located at the checkpoint, but it could not participate in the fighting"
Other "combat" uses:
>sitting in bases in Bosnia
>rented by Canada and sitting in bases in the Middle East
Literally the only action listed was one firing 4 shots at a town it was miles away from and running over an IED
wow, such a rich operational history
>>29739150
>"The Taliban have been engaged with some of the new Leopard 2 tanks in several ambushes" and that as a result the Taliban "learned some very harsh lessons" and lost the battle in question "very quickly and very violently."
>In January 2008, Danish tanks halted a flanking maneuver by Taliban forces near the Helmand River by providing gunfire in support of Danish and British infantry from elevated positions.
>Beginning on December 7, 2008, Leopard 2 tanks took part in Operation Red Dagger, firing 31 rounds in support of Coalition troops as they recaptured Nad Ali District. A press release from the British Ministry of Defence praised the tank's fire accuracy and mobility, claiming the Leopard 2 was a decisive factor in the coalition's success.
Is this guy a day/k/are leftover?
>>29739150
>rented by Canada
They bought them at a discount actually. Were the first to test the anti-mine/IED system.
>>29735243
still mad you lost WW2, huh?
the german military is a goddamn joke, it sucks on the rest of NATOs tits to stay alive.
fuck off and go play with your wiesels.
>>29736561
I think the story of The Beast is gonna go down in history like the battle of 73 easting, its that damn awesome.
![Germany_topo_Fulda_Gap[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4MWn1tf.jpg "Germany_topo_Fulda_Gap[1].jpg")
>>29735243
Is that really the way to speak to your cold war guardians?
>>29739717
>guardians
The US plans for a war on german soil was to literally nuke everything because muh soviet tanks. I'm pretty sure most germans would have preferred to life under communism instead.
>>29739827
I'm sorry, who kept the slavic horde from pulling a Berlin 2.0 on a continental scale?
Ya'll fuckers should erect a statue of LeMay, if anything.
>>29736561
They have at least three. In the last battle they where in two broke down(not sure how or to what extent) So they only used one that they nicknamed beast.
>>29740388
I should add they broke down on the way there
