The one I have seems ok, but lacks witness holes which sucks for a range mag since I rarely ever fully load them... They are like $5 cheaper than oem so not really worth it to me other than to try...

>>29437309
I thought about picking one up to try out when I was at the gun shop at lunch but decided against it.

>>29437309

As a backup weapon, failure may be the very reason you pull it. If the sidearm fails you too....you then must have attempted to skirt savings on a lifesaving device, and thus, are killed by it.

>>29437309
Mine smelled weird when i took it out of the packaging.

>>29437309
I heard the Gen 1 Magpul Glock mags were having problems... Something with the feed lips. I'm sure they will work out the geometry, but I would stay away from the first production ones.

I got the 2nd gen last year and they've had no problem. The lack of witness holes may annoy some but I didn't care. I am confident that they are fine fore duty mags.

>>29439730
they already fixed them and had a recall. All mags should now be the 'improved' version.

>>29437309
Glock brand glock mags are cheap, plentiful, and reliable.
I see no need to save a few bucks and induce a variable.

>>29437309
They should make them for the M&P.

>>29439883
They should make em for HK and Walther. And everyone else that has $40 mags. Actually fuck it, somebody call ETS

>>29438172
That's the smell of freedom anon.

>>29438172
Plastic softeners. More weird it smells, more harmful it is. Avoid sekin contact, chemicals will absord into your body and act as testosterone blockers.