V-22 Osprey. Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>>29333220
thumbs
oh god thumbs
help
it's a disaster
marines won't be able to fight a war because they spent their budget on non-combat shitty tilt rotors
>>29333220
Thumbs up, it's pretty. That's all that matters.
Thumbs sideways then up.
Thumbs up
>>29333220
Cool idea, one step closer to universal heavy lift VTOL.
>>29333220
Just waiting for the UK to buy some for Ariel refuelling from their carriers and maybe AEW further down the line.
>>29333958
>non-combat
>>29336016
wut?
u think she gon suck start a well head mid ocean o sumthin?
>>29336016
I doubt they will
what would be the point?
>>29336126
They already are. AEW&C will be handled by modified Merlin rotary wing birds, and the Ospreys have already undergone testing for aerial refueling with F-18s. I have little doubt the British especially with utilize them for this; the USN is already replacing all the C-2 Greyhound with Ospreys for replenishment. I don't think it'll be long before they figure out how to run a RO/RO replenishment module with them and add the capability to a block upgrade. Way more efficient than using bugs with buddy stores.
>>29336181
Brit commentator here, agreed though V-22 sits on the back of the line for the shopping list for the armed forces. Navy took a good share of budget this turn, they've now got to wait at the back for their projects whilst the army get the new IFV platform rolling out.
piss poor armaments
no autorotation
poor glide envelope
too fast for rotary wing escort
can't go down in a hurry while in helicopter mode. unless you want to crash.
the million dollar ground vehicle made to fit in it. discontinued because "muh armor". is also too dangerous to be used as a garrison vehicle.
"Fuck you all."
V-22 probably.
