[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is it reasonable to expect that the B-21 will be able to use
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 1
File: B-21-600x368.jpg (28 KB, 600x368) Image search: [Google]
B-21-600x368.jpg
28 KB, 600x368
Is it reasonable to expect that the B-21 will be able to use small diameter bombs for CAS?
>>
>>29230853
Why even care?
>>
>>29230862

Heated internet argument on another site. Somebody is claiming that the LRSB will use small diameter bombs for CAS.
>>
>>29230853
Maybe, but it'd be more useful for hitting a crapton of targets over a long mission.
>>
>>29230853

Is there even any requirement to use the BATO in such a way?
>>
>>29230875

Practical or not doesn't matter. All that matters is whether it is POSSIBLE or not.
>>
>>29230894
Don't see why it wouldn't. Even the B-2 can carry the smallest of JDAMs.
>>
>using a VLO aircraft with a high cost per hour to perform CAS when we still have B-1 Lancers in the arsenal

but why
>>
The LRSB's mission includes tactical level bombing, so yes.

Unlikely to be doing it regularly due to per hour flight costs, though.
>>
>>29230936

The B-21 will eventually replace the B-1. Not for a very long time, but it will eventually happen.
>>
>>29230873

plausible? no. possible? probably.
>>
>>29230936
>High cost per hour
What makes you think it will cost any more to operate than the B-1?
>>
>>29231261
History
>>
>>29230997
Depends on just how many they produce, the B1 was supposed to replace the B52 and look how that turned out
>>
>>29231261
It will be new, retard.
>>
>>29231955
The cost to keep an aircraft in the air increases as the airframe ages and becomes more maintenance intensive.
>>
>>29232108
And newer shit costs more to maintain, seemingly regardless of how simple or complex it actually is.
>>
>>29230853
The purpose of the B-21 is not for dropping bombs, but rather it is for a more economical means for space travel to the Lunar and Martian colonies until all the kinks are worked out with the Hadron Collider Teleportation device.
>>
>>29232143
B-1's aging swing wings are a fucking nightmare. B-21 is mostly off-the-shelf tech to cut costs. It'll be cheaper
>>
>>29230853
It's replacing B-52 so yeah it will. It will integrate it if doesn't have it already.
>>
>>29230894
That's a stupid fucking question then.
>>
>>29232143
newer shit costs more because it usually DOES more and has MORE equipment in it
>>
>>29233617

and it breaks less often because it's new.
>>
>>29230862
Because you can probably fit like 80 of 'em in it.

>We Ace Combat nao
Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.