>#SAA for the first time in the world used #Russian military robots & seized strat.height 754 Tower Siriatel #Latakia pic.twitter.com/Jt1ke4gNy3
https://mobile.twitter.com/WarfareWW/status/680028885891813376
>Platform-M - remote controlled robotic unit on a crawler, armed with grenade launchers and Kalashnikov
This thing is fully autonomous too.
I wonder how it does Friend or Foe determination... maybe small radio transmitters? Or maybe it uses patterns?
This is the scariest thing so far from this war. It's scarier than even if they had used nukes on IS.
This is how Terminators will start.
>>28305538
>>28305557
So where's the pictures of the lifeless village where it massacred the locals? Where's the meticulous attention to detail on the massive corpse sculpture built to intimidate the survivors?
>pleb/10
>One unit
It'll take an RPG 30m into it's first deathcrawl, the russians will blow up the rest of it with an airstrike to deny it to the US and China and that'll be the last we hear of it.
>Jeep-size amphibious vehicle Argo armed with PK 7.62 machinegun, RPG-26 Aglen, RShG-2 thermobaric warhead
human rights groups will go nuts.
>>28305557
>This thing is fully autonomous too.
I doubt that
>>28305638
Why would anyone give a fuck
>>28305538
Is that a tail gunner?
KILL THE ALIENS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
>>28305557
>fully autonomous
prove it
>>28305557
>This thing is fully autonomous too.
>>28305638
>human rights groups will go nuts.
And Russia will care exactly how much about this?
Or even acknowledge the possibility of collateral damage occurring for that matter, remember there haven't been ANY civilian casualties in the last couple months of bombing Syria according to them.
Sure some people will bleat about it being SO INHUMANE someone might get shot by remote control the same as it's SO INHUMANE if someone uses improvised bombs to blow people up instead of shinily manufactured ones, and still nobody else will give any fucks.
>>28305640
>>28305670
>>28305680
I expect 'fully autonomous' means if contact is lost with the controller the thing automatically reverses itself (into a ditch) to try and get back in signal range, or something equally unimpressive and generally counter productive.
![vXbPxd3yBUo[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nUSDRHo.jpg "vXbPxd3yBUo[1].jpg")
>>28305538
Absolutely unproofed bullshit. Platform-M is battle platform for marines and coastal defense.
>>28305705
Ah yes the James's Yeager AI. I've heard about that.
>>28305661
Yes, it is. 30mm Gast gun. It is actually pretty clever, fires a mix of proximity shells and chaff rounds. It is kinda like a point defense ECM station.
SOON
>>28305640
Not really.
>>28305737
ok I admit, I did chortle at that
It's been 4 days since this tweet and I've yet to see any video or confirmation from credible source. The image itself dates back to a year old article from a military related tabloid
http://topwar.ru/65092-tanki-drony-i-ekzoskelety-chem-budut-formirovatsya-roty-boevyh-robotov-v-rossiyskoy-armii.html
>>28305749
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudelman-Rikhter_NR-23
I believe it may be this gun instead.
>>28305890
>Nudelman
>>28305557
>fully autonomous
you clearly do not know what that word means, so I'll help you out:
autonomous means it needs absolutely no outside input whatsoever. you turn it on and let it go, and it does everything all on its own.
that is not what that robot does.
>>28305705
>'fully autonomous' means if contact is lost with the controller the thing automatically reverses itself
No, that's not even remotely what that phrase means.
>>28305903
>>28305914
>I expect "fully autonomous" means
He's saying he doesn't believe the slavs about it being fully autonomous, you goofs.
>>28305557
>This thing is fully autonomous too.
Probably gonna be, shoot everything with heat signature until back in controllers range.
>>28305538
>>28305557
>Russia was the first country in history to field robots on the battlefield
Who would've thought?
>>28306012
Forgive my ignorance, but the reason it can raise up like that has something to do with being airdropped, right?
>>28305719
How many shots of x54r can that camera take?
>>28306067
A lot--it's digital, so it won't run out of film.
>>28305962
>He's saying he doesn't believe the slavs
How did you get that from this post?:
>>28305557
>This thing is fully autonomous too.
>>28305785
sauce?
>>28305914
I should've just quoted >>28305914 quoting >>28305705, who was expressing doubt.
Your goof status is rescinded.
>>28305636
>blow up the rest of it with an airstrike to deny it to the US and China
Because Russian robot technology is so cutting edge, the US and China would care to even look at it.
>>28306054
so it wouldn't fuck up suspension on landing(bonus info, if needed can be dropped with crew inside) and has bonus of able hide behind obstacles etc.
>>28306088
The anamatrix
>>28306096
>Your goof status is rescinded.
Thank you good sir.
>>28306047
the soviets were the first to send robotic rovers to the moon so it seems kinda natural
>>28306047
But this is not true.
>>28306216
so... in which wars were armed combat robots used before?
drones are still controlled by people.
>>28306284
>Platform-M - remote controlled robotic unit o
So is this thing.
>>28306284
>drones are still controlled by people.
So is this.
>>28306284
>drones are still controlled by people.
So are these robots.
"Robot" literally means "remote controlled".
>>28306047
>first country in history to field robots on the battlefield
But that was the Nazis.
>>28306311
>"Robot" literally means "remote controlled".
> actually "Robot" literally means "worker"
>>28306337
Russians, always trying to steal the achievements of the Nazis.
>>28306341
What language are we speaking?
>>28306337
the soviet beat them to it as they used remote controlled tanks during the winter war
>>28306362
the word is derived from czech, so i guess slavic languages where rabota means 'to work' or a variation of that verb
>>28306371
Hey now, slavs are people too. You can't just assume all tanks driven by a slav is "remote controlled" by a real human.
>>28306337
>robot
>ww2
kek'd fucking hard.
>>28306308
Difference is that human is not a part of the kill chain. Sure, humans will tell it to kill people but humans won't be pulling the trigger.
>>28306407
Um no. this thing is controlled by a person .
>>28306407
Why don't you just stop saying stupid things?
>>28306337
Man, the leap in technology that's been achieved by nation in just a decade. And the post WW2 period as well - just look how americans got stuck in nowhere with bogus revelations like lasers and railguns ever since the Operation Paperclip had ran its course.
>>28306341
>[the current year]
>repeating this meme
just stop, it wasn't true a hundred years ago and it isn't true now.
>>28306407
>Difference is that human is not a part of the kill chain.
But this is false.
>>28306440
Well, it was just a radio controlled tracked mine, so nothing too advanced.
Looks cool.
>>28306450
>radio controlled tracked mine
It was a wire-guided mobile satchel charge.
>>28306047
>First ever Robot on the battlefield
>>28306284
>First ever autonomous robot on the battlefield
>>28306407
>First ever robot to make kill decision by itself.
What will vatnik pull out of his ass next. Taking bets now.
>>28306073
epic :^)
>This thing is fully autonomous too.
>>28306371
everybody was doing it in ww2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylorcraft_LBT
>The glider bomb, or "Glomb", would be towed by an ordinary carrier-based aircraft to the area of its target; guidance following release of the glider from its towing aircraft was intended to be provided by a TV camera located in the nose of the glider, which would transmit its signal to a piloted aircraft, an operator aboard the control aircraft using radio control to steer the Glomb to its target.[2] Following the Navy's initial evalulation, the Glomb comcept was deemed to be worth developing further, and the project was given official status by the Bureau of Aeronautics in April 1941.[1]
>>28306568
tfw Russian mod did commercials directer at gamers especially at WOT and AW
>that operator may be your average suka kurwa blet teammate from wot.
>>28306088
The Animatrix. Its quite good a watch.
>>28306568
that's a monitoring and manual-mode control station.
problem is that it has a fully autonomous mode and can shoot people without any intervention by a human operator.
>>28306715
So in that case it'll shoot its allies in the back and drive into a lake. Yet again the world is safe from the clutches of the Russians.
>>28306130
>Being this arrogant
>>28307403
hahahahhahahahhah damn son dont forget blaming matchmaking
>>28305557
>Russian drones needs confirmation from the operator in order to attack targets
>Drunk slav uses pic related
>Skynet is born
Judgment Day when?
>>28305538
that tailgunner
mildly kek
>>28305538
>expensive high tech weapons
>in a high intensity third world war
I hope this tech demonstration goes well because those toys are gonna be taken out by a home made anti material rifle.
God I love it when Russia does tech demonstration in Syria. The cruise missiles were kind of a waste considering they probably hit targets that have already been targeted multiple times by the West and by Russia itself.
You guys seen videos about Scorpion?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZbqsYYapW4
longer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0O-aCMdIik
>>28305538
Did russia just remake the Bob Semple tank?
>>28309894
>the bob semple tank was a robot
No...?
>>28305538
That plane has a tail gunner. What year is this?
>>28309894
damn! that thing looks like a death trap... a coffin on tracks.
