Maybe, 21 feet is the suppsive your to late distance.
Id still try might have a knife wound in me but hopefully get a shot of

>>28299311
What the hell did I just read?

>>28299360
not sure

>>28299311
The 21 foot rule assumes:
The knife attacker has his weapon drawn, the gun defender does not. (Unfair comparison.)
The defender does not move, either backwards to increase the time it takes the attacker to reach him, or sideways to sidestep the attack.
The defender does not use his off hand to defend himself in anyway.
>>28299360
Never heard of the 21 foot rule? It's a pretty famous thing.

~1.75 seconds, hands raised above shoulder, IWB holster under a t-shirt @ ~4:30

>>28299360
He illiterately tried to say that 20 ft is the minimum distance required to draw your gun and kill a knife attacker without self-injury with a 50% success chance, based on that 60s or 70s studies with the US police. I'll find the video and link it.

>>28299386
Third anon here: never fucking heard of it.

>>28299390
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_KJ1R2PCMM

Here we are

>>28299397
A study showed that it was neigh impossible for a shooter to draw, aim, and fire a fire arm in the time it takes the average man to charge 21 feet, knife drawn, and stab them. People use this to argue that knives are better than guns for defense, but they are wrong for the reasons I stated in: >>28299386
I mean really, it takes just as long to draw a knife as it does a gun.

I'm never condition one. I appendix carry so I'd probably be dead

>>28299429
It does say, however, that knives are better to attack from concealment

>>28299711
How so?

>>28299263
My concealment to first shot on the A-zone of an IPSC target at 12yds. on a dry run averages 1.80 on the timer. Usually I can shave .20-.30 off of that after a few dry fire or live fire runs.
My best time ever was 1.43.