C308
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUE1l-2yR3M
just another example of century quality!
>>28274762
Lol, and people actually said that Century had changed.
But why do people who own the Cetme/G3 style rifles always blab about its history? I can't say I've seen it happen much with other guns, but you give a one of these guys the chance and they'll talk your ear off about the history of their damn gun.
>>28274831
They want to make sure you know they didn't buy some piece of shit and that it's a copy of a gun that has been in many conflicts around the world.
>>28274831
Second string rifle, with a third rate history, by a shamefur company
Yes this is a thing now
>>28275627
Thank mr century man
>>28274873
Pic related
G3 is a wonderful rifle.
>>28275736
PSG1/MSG90 is a wonderful precision rifle.
G3, leaves a lot to be desired.
Cetme even more so
Century is just leave it alone.
>>28275799
I'm currently saving up for the PTR version, the only product I have read good review on from century is the C39 and the C39 V2
>>28274762
>3-5 MOA
>firing pin broken after 100 rounds
>>28274831
Maybe they think people don't know the history behind the design the gun? Suffice to say, it's not like the CETME pattern rifle is as common place as the AR or AK.
But personally, I feel a lot of people feel the need to explain the history of the gun if it wasn't designed in the last 20 years. Especially when it comes to Cold War era guns.
Did people expect anything different from a budget rifle cobbled together from surplus parts?
>>28275736
>Pic related
But that's not Jiisuri.
>>28275865
Always.
>>28274762
Why do people shit on this youtuber so much? It seems that he delivers information in a very clear an concise way, which is a lot more than can be said of most gun youtube channels. (looking at you, nutn, hickock45, Iraqveteran8888, etc.)
>>28276534
Oh shit, you're right.
>>28276792
yeah he isn't bad, just a bit plain if anything. You don"t have to include tannerite explosions and oper8r lingo, but i feel like he is missing something.
>>28276792
because your on 4chan bra
>>28274762
century == junk
g3 and all clones == junk
who could have guessed what would happen
>>28279198
Opinion glossed over.
700 for a century 5moa monkey gun or 1000 for a 1 moa PTR
Why would anyone even buy a c308?
>>28279225
>extraordinarily deailed and well drawn gun
>face consists of a line for the mouth, a dot for the nose, and ridiculous looking oversized eyes
fuck you, japan
I was literally about to order one of these.
Felt bad since I could find an M77 and I want a cheap 308.
I am no longer going to order one of these.
>>28274762
>Slamfiring
HOW THE FUCK DID THEY FUCK IT UP THIS BAD.
JESUS
FUCKING
CHRIST
THIS IS NOT A HARD PLATFORM TO MANUFACTURE.
>>28280112
the depth of the character matters more than the visuals
>>28274762
>an historic
>an h
>an hero
omg
>>28274762
>>28274831
How is this Century's fault? All this stuff was easy to fix, and you guys are acting like this means Century and the C308 is shit, when It's not.
Talk about poorfags not being able to afford to replace parts, lol. PTR goys are just mad that they had to pay $900 - $1000 when if they just waited they could've bought a C308 that's just as good at a fraction of a cost.
>>28275818
PTR is good. Mine had a weld crack and needed to be sent back. It happened around 800 rounds. First I have heard of that but free fix. Otherwise it is my favorite gun out of about 30.
Don't buy anything century made. Imported is usually fine but their c39 rifles are bad.
>>28282172
>C39 is bad
I own a V93 wich has been flawless, how is the C39 bad?
I own a C308. It's okay - but I only paid $580.
>>28281983
well, he couldn't repeat another slamfire, so it might've been a bad primer.
Then again, his firing pin broke, so suspicions point right back to the gun.
>>28282163
well, it's like paying high dollars for a high class hooker vs. cross-my-fingers quality if you were to pay for your mom.
Sure, both have a chance of giving you STD's, but your mom has a much more lower standard, so she is the bigger risk.
>>28279225
>people defending century
maybe if you poortr fags got a job you could afford nice guns to ruin
>>28279366
1 moa? Mabe with match you mong
>>28281953
Get a savage then, those rifles are extremely accurate out of the box
>>28279366
>1 moa PTR
Sorry, but you are probably not going to get a 1MOA with a regular PTR out of the box. 1.5-2.5 is more realistic with a good shooter and good ammo. To get 1MOA reliably from a PTR means extensive modifications or by the more expensive MSR/MSG models.
>>28283669
>>28283851
Don't try and quell muh superior German engineering battle rifle fantasies.
It "feels" sub-moa in my hands because of sheet metal stampings and superior tight tolerances.
>>28283669
>using unneccesary analogies
colion autism pls go
>>28282188
I have mixed reviews on these rifles and would rather not be an early adopter. Especially if I can get a proven WASR or PAP in the same price range.
Why trust a company that has a history of poor craftsmanship to launch a new product without any problems?
This m70 ab2 cost me $500 and has been perfect.
>>28283812
Get the How a 1500. Same lrice, much better trigger.
