Now shipping.
>fucking $998
http://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2015/11/2/beretta-m9a3-now-shipping/
>CHEAPER PER UNIT THAN M9
Lying wops.
>>27777584
>"military issue" gun
>not marked up for civilians for keks
>>27777577
People have no problem with a $1.3k MSRP for a P226 with a tan paint fob and threaded barrel.
92s are great, full size handguns. It's not quite the same level of a gun then a comparable 226, but that's why berettas usually run at a $300-$400 discount to the 226.
Alloy frame? Or Steel brand steel
>>27777877
Probably alloy. Steel is only used on their competition guns and the extra weight would be a drawback in military trials.
>>27777577
what's special about this over a normal m9 or 92fs?
>>27777910
ABSOLUTELY
NOTHING
>>27777584
this
>>27777910
tactical brown color(s), smaller more comfortable grip, M1913 rail, threaded barrel, comes with 17rd mags
PS what happened to the M9A2
>>27777990
SAY IT AGAIN!
>>27777990
SAY IT LOUD!
>>27777577
they could at least make it in 7.62 Tok, for that price.
> Addresses about every issue about M9
> Lots of fucking upgrades
> Street prices still less than buying Vertec and adding everything.
> Less than Wilson Combat and 92G-SD
Y'all niggas are retarded
>>27778938
It's got that SCAR-tier FDE mismatch though.
I'll probably still get the Wilson Combat.
>>27778938
still has a slide safety that pushes up to fire.
>>27778954
Why would you want it to push down to fire?
>inb4 muh makarov
>>27777910
Tan, night sights, front sight dovetail, small grip (vertec grip), a decocker instead of a safety (92G), and a threaded barrel.
You could not have all this shit done to a 92 for less that what Beretta is charging, and vertec's if you can find one start around $700. No one bats an eye at a 226 for this much and this gun will go for under MSRP.
This is the 92's final form. If only they would FUCKING MAKE ONE WITH A FRAME SAFETY i would buy one tomorrow.
>>27779087
cz75
>>27779100
Already own a SP01
>>27779087
>this is the 92's final form
also known as 11 years ago. and it doesn't have a brig slide.
>>27779087
>mfw I can literally but a "used" S&W 29-2 for that money
>>27779129
Why isn't the M9 like this?
>>27779129
Can't afford it, but the want is SO strong.
>>27779087
>>27778954
>DAE le slide safety? LOL
>>27779143
It used to be. The original 92 had a frame safety but the Italian police (or military) wouldn't accept it unless it had a firing pin safety, ergo slide mounted.
>>27779165
That's the part that hurts the most. Also every time i see a Taurus and look at the frame safety/decocker i scream inside.
>>27779165
would a stand alone firing pin block not have been acceptable?
>>27779186
Obviously not you dumb shit
>>27777577
I'll buy one if they drop down to a comfortable $900 in a year or two. For what it is and what you get, it's in line in price with its competitors and we should see a price drop before too long.
>shitty shooters still crying about a slide safety
Buy a G, convert to a G, or you know just learn how to use the safety, it isn't hard.
>>27779207
I would rather it be $899 like I know it's $900 but I lie to myself and say it's a good deal and buy it
>>27779087
>FUCKING MAKE ONE WITH A FRAME SAFETY
Buy a Taurus.
>>27777577
>$1000 handgun
The only reason I would pay that much for a handgun is if it's a sought-after collector's item or if it's some special snowflake caliber.
>>27779314
>tfw bought a taurus over a beretta
>never had a single problem
>anyone I show it to says the safety is in a much better spot, and how beretta's safeties should be
I really want to know who the fuck thought the slide safety was a good idea, and why they haven't made a 92fs with a frame safety yet.
>>27778828
A! 3! LORD!
WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
LISTEN TO ME
A3 IS NOTHING BUT A HEARTBREAKER
A3 FRIEND ONLY TO MONEYMAKERS
AAAAA! 3!
IT'S AN ENEMY TO FANS OF 9
THE SALE PRICE JUST BLOWS MY MIND
A3 HAS MADE A MESS
OUT OF BERETTA'S REPUTATION
REJECTION THEN DISAFFECTION
WHO WANTS TO BUY?
>>27780495
>Taurus
>reliable
>>27778836
Shut the fuck up you retard
>>27779416
>sought after collectors item
>$1000
Bad news anon
>>27780495
>I really want to know who the fuck thought the slide safety was a good idea
some dumb wop cop
>and why they haven't made a 92fs with a frame safety yet.
because they sold all the tooling for frame safety guns to Taurus
>>27780495
>>27781310
It was the US military's idea and they still have tooling for frame safeties. They make special editions with frame safeties every once and a while. The billenium for example has a frame safety.
I personally don't give a fuck about the frame safety, I just use it as a decocker and leave it off safe.
>>27779207
This guy gets it. I have a slide mounted safety on 2/3 pistols I own, and have NEVER had any issue.
Question, aside from the stupid name, why does the 90-Two get no love?
>>27777577
>muh slide safety
Bitch about that all you want, plebs. This is a beautiful piece of weaponry.
>>27779087
Except my like-new vertex cost me $500 used.
If you're dumb enough to still be buying new guns, you deserve to get screwed out of every penny you have.
>>27781578
Because there is no legitimate purpose for it, you don't need that gun that was designed specifically for shooting aliums.
>muh threaded barrel
>muh picatinny rail
>muh FDE paintjob
Wow, such improvement, much better
>>27777577
When will Beretta remove that pole from their asses?
>>27781578
Never heard of it until now. Looks neat.
>>27781061
underrated post
>>27781681
> Beretta guns designed to shoot space invaders
You don't say ...
> Neos
> CX4
> ARX
>>27781716
Never. Because they sell to people who have sticks up their asses and woukd sperg out if anything changed.
> Italians
> Even once
>>27781920
Beretta makes high quality pistols at a good price, fuk u and the horse you rode in on m8.
>Buying a Beretta instead of a CZ
>>27783483
>buying CZ ever
>>27783483
>not buying both
>>27783483
>buying one gun means you cannot own another
>>27778011
>PS what happened to the M9A2
It was only available to those who had a licensed copy of Windows 9
>>27781615
> why would you want a virgin GF?
>>27778983
>inb4 about a million other handguns
Because with a flip-down safety your thumb is closer to if not completely in a correct firing position when you finish the action of taking off the safety. And because flipping up is awkward, especially with the safety mounted high up on the slide instead of on the frame (which is where your thumb should be).
>>27778954
>>27783655
I made a vid last week for you guys that believe the beretta safety should be reversed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xCwOAQZHSw
>>27783565
I remember that thread
>>27783709
>excuses the video
the Beretta safety is pants on head retarded
>>27783767
>no argument the reply
>>27783709
I don't think it should be easier to take off the safety than to put it on. It should be a deliberate push, and I think the only reason it makes sense on the 92 is because it's already harder to get to the safety in the first place.
I don't agree that it's the same motion, and there's still the factor of the height of the safety compared to a frame safety. Look how far your own thumb travels on your 92 compared to your 1911.
I see that you're showing that you push forward, but with a 1911 style safety you are lowering your thumb directly into a firing position while simultaneously taking the safety off, which is better than pushing forward and then resettling your thumb.
>>27783792
This vid was for tards who think the safety actually matters, I don't even use the safety as a safety, I just decock it and flip it off. It's second nature to me. DA/SA guns do not need a safety IMO, I do the same shit with my makarov.
And yeah, it's practically the same motion, if you're holding the pistol with both hands and flip off the safety with your right thumb, your thumb lands in the both thumbs forwards shooting position just like a 1911.
Another thing, if the safety were reversed the safety lever would be pointinting down when you shoot. In my hands that poses an interference with my right thumb, I would have to cross one thumb over the other like I do with my mak instead of both thumbs forward.
The beretta safety is absolutely the correct way for a slide mounted safety.
>>27783833
>This vid was for tards who think the safety actually matters, I don't even use the safety as a safety, I just decock it and flip it off. It's second nature to me. DA/SA guns do not need a safety IMO, I do the same shit with my makarov.
Well, that I can agree with.
>>27783833
Beretta noob here.
Isn't the firing pin safety deactivated when the safety is off? Does that not mean the gun isn't drop safe?
>>27784123
>Isn't the firing pin safety deactivated when the safety is off?
No, pulling the trigger is the only thing that deactivates it.
>>27784191
Cool thanks. Would love to get a 92 but whenever I hold one my fingers end up right on the forward edge of the grips, which feels like shit. Guess it's too much fun for me.
>>27784224
*gun for me
>>27781061
10/10
>>27783613
I guess that's what I get for pirating it.
>>27781899
>TFW everyone laughed at Beretta, until the Aliums came
>TFW defending earth from space Aluims without Anti-Alium Beretta tech
Any of you faggots have experience with a 92G-SD?
Muh decocker, re-enforced slide, pick a tin rail
Anyway, they sound cool but I've never seen one for sale
>>27778950
Yeah I'm not sure why you'd want that two tone look.
I could understand wanting just the grips or the grips and the barrel a different color, but the barrel and frame one color, the slide another, and the grips a third?
That I do not get. I like tactical paintjobs where the frame and slide are the same color.
>>27781327
Bu...bu...bu... What if my weak little bitch hands that can't deal with the grip circumference have trouble racking the slide like a l33t oper8or and magically engage the safety/decocker... And then not notice the fact that it fucking decocked... And then not notice the safety wings being down on safe!
>>27784401
It breaks up the outline of the weapon. It's camouflage.
>>27777584
I'm sure that was IF the military adopted it.
>>27784368
because they're literally as rare as hens teeth.
>>27781578
>why does the 90-Two get no love?
Most complaints about it is that the grip feels slippery for some hands. Unlike most 92 styles, the 90-Two doesn't have the wide variety of grip options because the frame is designed for 1 of 2 proprietary grip designs.
Also, the looks are love-or-hate.
>>27781615
>estos testículos , coño! El gran incendio en mis pantalones me fue dada por su abuela !
>>27777577
>not 92D
dropped
>>27785209
Bartlesville?
>>27783613
>windows 9
It still hurts
>>27787395
>92D
Those are for people that like to use box jellyfish as pocket pussy.
>>27788122
So, real men?
>>27788151
I was going to say masochist.
>>27781188
Like I said, I've never had a single problem. You can go ahead and spout as many memes as you want, it doesn't change anything. pt92s are made with beretta's tooling. Mine has shot flawlessly for over 5k rounds, and eats any ammo I put in it.
>>27779207
How about fuck you and your shit handgun. I'll take my money to a company that gives a fuck about making a proper product.
>>27781578
>>27781785
Besides the slip-on grips, it's just a funky-looking A1.
>>27784363
>yfw Beretta has been around for 500 years because they are ready for aliums
> yfw no other gun maker has been around long enough to know better
>yfw winning the pistol contract wasn't an accident
The gubmint is ready for the aliums to invade man
>>27777577
>still that godawful lever on the slide
>Hurr, its now just a decocker
Still a FUCKING LEVER on the slide
Put that shit at a frame position and I'll buy it.
>>27789100
Same thing, really.
