How good is he /ic/?
Personally, I think he's a super cool dude. Artistically, eh
I like the fish and trees
reminds me of Shrek scene where they roasted rats...
Idk
>>2596096
This
>>2596074
His work is the definition of amateur. But since he has a fanbase, he has no real incentive to improve.
I honestly don't understand the appeal of his work at all and I have no idea how he formed the fanbase he has when his work isn't really striking.
>>2596139
He makes animations and got most of his fans from TBFP, he also draw borderline porn and lurks /tg/. So there's that.
>>2596074
Why do you guys keep posting these nobodies who can't paint for shit? Is it still summer?
>>2596152
>got most of his fans from TBFP
I've noticed that most of the artists that pander to Youtube personalities and their fanbases tend to never be that good. Worse than the typical online fan-artists that just follow whatever IP is trending.
I subscribed to his YouTube channel and like what he talks about, especially the videos on writing, but am not so interested in his art.
>its another whos-this-artist episode
this must be some running inside joke
>>2596096
Some of his opinions/observations are GOAT and he has a sexy voice, but the rest of his opinions are garbage. His art is big fish in a small pond tier and he's a closet furfag.
>>2596241
When you draw things that are relevant to the masses on time you get a following. Surprised better artists don't do it more often.
>>2596350
Art is ultimately self-serving and not everyone cares about what the masses are into. Not only that but most fandoms are cancerous anyway.
>>2596152
He clearly does it for fun and just makes money off it because he can.
He's got a long way to go, but hes still better than 90% of /ic/
