why are women often drawn with bad backs?
because it puts emphasis on ass and breasts?
cause its prettier
Because women in real life often do have bad backs / bad posture.
>>2519621
see its prettier
>>2519606
The one on the left is impossible. The pelvis tilts forward for both men & women when standing. The left pose is not humanly possible.
That graphic is bullshit.
>>2519621
true
>>2519748
The pelvis is still tilted forward in that example you stupid kike.
>>2519748
wtf are you talking about. its perfectly possible.
>>2519748
Whenever one of the wannabe anatomy experts on /ic/ proclaims something is anatomically impossible, I have a heartfelt chuckle. The pelvis slightly tilting forward when in a relaxed, natural standing position does not mean you can't stand with the pelvis straight up. For fuck's sake, take a life drawing class. This is what happens when someone learns anatomy only from Michael Hampton and Vilppu where they exaggerate the rhythm of the human form for easier understanding and as a result stay completely oblivious to the subtleties of what real human bodies can look like.
>>2519748
Both are possible, but both are exaggerated.
>>2519606
art imitates life
This thread proves that /ic/ is the easiest place to bait.
>>2519606
none of these two are even close to a normal standing position. your spine never goes a straight line and neither do your legs
>>2519775
>real human bodies
Meh who need this shit, there's cameras for muh realism.
>>2519800
but yes, i do agree that women are often drawn with an extreme hollow-back because it emphasizes the ass. which brings us to the general problem that women are almost only depicted within the context of sexuality
>>2519762
>>2519773
If you look at:
>>2519775
Look at the way the man's back is bent in order to achieve that pelvis positioning. Your pelvis can not be positioned perfectly straight unless you manipulate the rest of your body to make it so. Which means that the rest of your body will NOT look like OP's left example.
What was shown in >>2519606 is impossible at a normal standing position as was shown on the left side unless something is wrong with your pelvis. This is not like J. Scott Campbell's Mary Jane cover in which the position was possible, but just uncomfortable as fuck. Of course your pelvis can be positioned in various ways, but the left example in OP's pic is not possible.
If you are going to sit here claiming people are wrong at least come with more convincing evidence than that. I am certain that you can not find a straight pelvis at a normal standing position without the body manipulated in some way. Anyone who says that they can is full of shit.
>>2519799
Whether you're being serious or just pretending, acting like a retard is still acting like a retard.
>>2519806
So are you. Fuck off.
>>2519817
Are you fucking retarded or something? Of course it's entirely possible. First of all, her pelvis IS slightly tilted even in the left image and secondly, how the fuck can it be "humanly impossible" if all you have to do is slightly push back your pelvis?. Seriously, go stand in front of a mirror and take that pose yourself. If you can't do this then there's something seriously wrong with your spine.
>>2519843
What you are suggesting be done isn't a natural position. You have to adjust your back and body in order to make you pelvis do that and no that shit isn't titled slightly on the left.
I do agree that some artists over exaggerate that curve on women as if they constantly in high heels, but your pelvis can not do that unless you manipulate your body to make it so. I am STILL waiting for evidence that proves me wrong.
Spoiler alert: You are never going to find it.
its called anterior pelvic tilt and womens pelvises are usually more tilted than mens
>>2519808
That's not a problem
>Spoiler alert: You are never going to find it.
This. Men are drawn in the exact same manner because that's how our bodies work, it's not even a matter of posture being good or bad. There is an s-curve to our spine. Bunch of retards itt.
>>2519606
Because women have a naturally more forward tilted pelvis and that arching the lower back to emphasize the ass (and therefore the genitals) is a behavior called "presenting" that pretty much all female mammals exhibits when they are ready to mate. We find it sexy because it's in our instinct.
>>2519646
it's not prettier, it gives them a gut
>>2519621
Frontal pics of her?
>>2519966
No it doesn't.
>>2519799
>>2519819
>>2519991
are you blind
they look like a duck with a belly
that's even why a lot of girls think they are "fat" no matter how skinny they are, they ahve bad posture
>>2520006
It's not 'bad' posture. It's the way women normally stand due to the shape of their pelvis. Funny enough wearing high heels juts the pelvis out even more.
>>2519775
The irony of your post is that even in that image you posted the pelvis is still more tilted than the example in OP's pic.
Maybe you should study more anatomy before you start talking shit?
>>2519621
Did Blizzard use this as a reference for widowmakers pose?
>Tfw lumbar lordosis
>>2520023
no they dont, you should leave your basement every once in a while
>>2519621
that pose looks super stupid
>>2520150
Reminds me of a Chicken for some reason.
>>2519808
They literally have nothing else to offer.
>>2520149
I don't know what you are referring to? The high heels? That is true.
>>2520006
This is exactly what happens to me.
I have a really shit posture and I get insecure of my belly because it sticks out due to my crappy spine deviation.
Not a good pose and also it's not even a healthy natural one
>>2519621
FUCK I FEEL THIS IN MY SPINE
Make it stop make it stop makeitstopmakeitstop
>>2519978
yup
>>2520219
>>/r9k/
>>2519621
LUMBAR LORDOSIS
U
M
B
A
R
L
O
R
D
O
S
I
S
>>2519606
Because bad backs mean bad bitches.
