So where is the art?

You could've at least used some post-production stabilization.

>>2474016
Thanks I agree. I'm honestly not even sure how to go about stabilization properly without it looking ridiculous.

>>2474008
I saw the pic and thought "timelapse, so speedpaint, right" and then it was just literally a camera that you left on a rooftop for a day. What feedback do you want? it's a camera that you left of all day and sped up the recording. It's not like it could be potentially better and the only way it would be worse is if a bird shat on the lens. For what purpose did you do this for?

>>2474021
But how is this art related?

>>2474008
boring, very boring, this is only like technical stuff without any meaning. And even if its technical its missing more quality as the other people say your camera shakes a lot, get a more sturdy tripod.

I guess you could critique the composition of the shot too,
It's pretty boring, for one it feels it all on a slant.
Every thing feels flat, the no contrast foreground, mid and back.
And I think in composition you should never put the horizon right across the middle of the screen, its just kinna boring.

If your gonna do more of these, put a little more effort into composition. do some research on what works.