I don't get it, what is the process for making this kind of background, traced or not? Is there any tutorial or video that shows/explain how they do it ? I mean, japanese animators need to draw fast because of their slave like salary, how much would it take the average one to make a drawing with this amount of details and such a nice render?
animators don't draw these scenic nonmoving backgrounds
They just referenced those backgrounds, and those are not done by animators.
>>2273250
Shinkai takes photos and makes them glittery and shit.
Mostly painted over I guess. Although I know that old Ghibli backgrounds weren't paintovers.
Anyway, recently I fell in love with the backgrounds of this guys: http://aymrc.tumblr.com/
They're not done by animators, there's usually a separate department for backgrounds.
They're done in watercolor or Photoshop IIRC.
Watch Kazuo Oga's painting on Youtube.
>>2273312
>makes them glittery and shit
It takes quite a bit more to go from that photo to this end result. In the example you post they completely changed the color temperature, the atmosphere, the time of the day, heavily simplified and improved the value structure, painted the sky and clouds from scratch and change the lightsource from overcast to strong directional light.
That's not quite the same as just adding a filter, some lenseflare and make it glittery.
>>2273661
>That's not quite the same as just adding a filter, some lenseflare and make it glittery.
In the mind of the average unskilled IC pleb it is.
>>2273592
not him, but it seems there was a series which the first two parts were removed. do you know where to get that documentary of him?
maybe you downloaded it from youtube when it was still up?
thanks!
>>2273669
Yeah, it's like people talking about photobash thinking it's really easy.
>>2273312
*post the english translation damnit
>>2273708
I only saw one on YT. I think there's a full video and a time lapse version.
>>2275876
was it the bus shelter/house one?
that was by a dude trying to copy makoto too
>>2276961
A mountain. It was Kazuo Oga painting using watercolor.
Look at the picture.
Paint what you see.
What the fuck kind of question is that, have you ever painted before?
Do you need a fucking tutorial for everything?
>>2273710
Whether it's difficult or easy is not relevant. Having a difficult and elaborate way to deprive your work of artistic merit doesn't somehow make it better.
Besides, you're an idiot if you think photobashing isn't easy. If it wasn't easy, nobody would photobash. They'd just paint.
>>2276977
>Besides, you're an idiot if you think photobashing isn't easy. If it wasn't easy, nobody would photobash. They'd just paint.
It's easier than painting? Sure. It's easy do it right? No. Sorry, but you're the idiot here. If it was that easy, the entire market would be almost exclusive with Brad Rigney like pieces.
>>2277047
>It's easier than painting? Sure.
I like how you're trying to create the impression that there's an easier method of creating concept art than photobashing. What the fuck else is there other than painting the art and copy pasting the art? As it stands, photobashing is not just easier, it's the easiest.
And I weep for your taste in art if you actually enjoy Brad Rigney and the likes.
It's the same type of creatively bankrupt artless garbage as hyperrealism, but now without even the merit of being demanding of patience.
