Previous Thread >>2660456
Post Collages or Requests
>>2667404
MY DICK
MOAR NUDES LESS CLOTHES!!!!!!!
This thread is so slow right now. Anyone got requests or ideas?
Here is a new collage from me.
>>2667711
Great collage! :D
I've got a few collages on the back burner, but I've had to focus on more work related stuff this week. Plus I've been trying to record a GIMP video/tutorial a few times, but my screen recorder doesn't seem to like GIMP, so I've wasted a bit of time with that.
Hopefully the thread will pick up a bit more over the weekend. Dump anon hasn't bee around as much it seems.
Other than requests and stuff, does anyone have anything giantess related they'd like to bring up for discussion?
>>2667727
In that case what is your dream giantess film? (i.e director, stars etc)
Collage Request using any of these images?
>>2667768
>>2667768
>>2667770
>>2667751
Multiple young AAA Hollywood actresses growing into giantesses of different scales; some growing out of their clothes, others growing with their clothes and later stripping out of them; heavily interacting with people/vehicles/buildings; lots of destruction; lots of giantess lesbian sex scenes; hours upon hours of hot hot hot giantess action of all types. Hue hue hue.
But seriously, it's an interesting question. I think now is a pretty good time for a solid Attack of the 50 Foot Woman remake. It could fit pretty well thematically with all the back-and-forth discussions about sexism in media at the moment. It might fit in well with all the current superhero movies (a giantess is kind of like a superhero in many ways - and look at how much praise Ant-Man's giant form got in Civil War) without just being *another* comic book movie.
The concept of a giant woman is pretty kooky, so I don't think it's likely that we'll see a mainstream giantess movie with a serious tone (and *especially* not one with any overtly sexual themes that you might expect from fetish material!)
Something with a lighthearted tone like the Avengers movies would probably work well. In that case, I'd imagine a director like Edgar Wright or Joss Whedon (famous for strong female characters?) would be a good fit? Quentin Tarantino is also an obvious choice given that he's a fan of those kinds of old B-movies, he makes good fun movies ... and it's speculated he might be a macrophile himself. He might be able to pull off something a bit darker too, maybe with more angry-giantess destruction? Who knows.
As for stars, I don't really have any strong preference. Honestly I'd be happy with almost any of the laundry list of current Hollywood A-listers.
What about everyone else? Anyone wanna get a bit more specific?
>>2667781
Basically Cloverfield or Godzilla, but replace Clover/Godzilla with Taylor Swift
>>2667406
hnnnng
>>2667786
Oh god THIS
>>2667727
>Hopefully the thread will pick up a bit more over the weekend. Dump anon hasn't bee around as much it seems.
I check this thread(s) multiple times a day, but I'm usually too lazy to post things. I'll fix that.
>>2667786
I mean, realistically, Taylor Swift isn't really an actress. Fun scenario aside, I can't really see her (or rather, her brand managers) wanting to star as "the monster" is a movie like that.
On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if she were to use some size themes in one of her future music videos.
Fun little story: a few years ago, someone bundled up a bunch of Taylor Swift giantess collages (mostly mine, but one or two were Wonderslug's) into a tumblr post. It got pretty popular, it's currently sitting on 11k notes:
http://taylorswiftnoticed.tumblr.com/post/108629116516/i-made-dis-this-is-truly-amazing-taylor-liked
What you'll notice about that particular blog is that it's a tumblr blog which keeps track of posts that Taylor Swift's official tumblr page "liked". And it noted that her official page "liked" it back in January of 2015. When I discovered this page a few months later, I bothered to scroll back through Taylor's page's likes (which are public) to confirm that it did actually like that post - it did!
So either Taylor Swift herself, or more likely, someone who runs her social media for her, has seen and "liked" some of her giantess content. I'd be surprised if they registered it as anything more than "ha, that's a funny picture!" though.
Five seems appropriate for now. And this other one explaining that I posted five.
>>2667814
Sorry anon, I don't mean to pressure you into posting when you don't want to! You've already contributed a whole bunch to these threads, it's probably us who need to pay you back!
>>2667818
Oh, okay then
Basically Cloverfield or Godzilla, but replace Clover/Godzilla with Taylor Momsen
Speaking of which,
>>2667711
fancy giving this a shot making her mega?
>>2667828
I don't think a serious giantess movie will happen due to absurd nature of a giantess, and I certainly don't want a movie with overly sexual themes. That would just be uncomfortable and boring for 2 hours. A comedic movie like the Marvel movies or something would work best.
I would personally like to see a good giantess who grows, and after having to learn how to live being big has to save the city from a more evil giantess that is destroying it. This provides good comedic moments of the girl adapting to her new size, and good action with the fight at the end. A lot of good opportunities for destructive and gentle giantess moments, and still having a plot to keep it interesting beyond the fetish aspect. It would be kind of like the old Godzilla movies, but with attractive women instead of monsters.
I think for this type of movie a comedic actress would be good, but I think most would be ok. Maybe someone like Anna Kendrick or Alison Brie, or someone similar. They need to have a good expressiveness, to express being giant or something. I think someone like Aubrey Plaza would make a good evil giantess since she is funny and can play evil too.
I would like a director like Edgar Wright to direct since he has a strong visuals in his movies, which I think would be pretty important for a movie like this. Plus his Ant-Man work shows he can do scale well.
>>2667828
I can try. She would make a good giantess.
>>2667823
Nah, I want to dump as much as I can without running out and not being able to bump the thread. I like to think I'm sparking some creativity with some creators in here.
GiantessCity seems to have slowed to a crawl of a crawl of a crawl. A few necroposts and that's it.
>>2667823
Also I will absolutely never get tired of seeing that picture.
Also /r/ing more "getting attacked by the army but almost not even noticing it" type collages, if I may be so bold as to ask
>>2667884
Andrianna makes such a great model
Even more, the thought of a giantess eating school children/human lamb is strangely arousing
>>2667895
>strangely arousing
GTS-fetish in a nutshell, fämälaam.
So who we got here, Inter, docop, anal/danfordan, does wonderslug come here? and me I guess
Forgot to post
>>2667914
Pree good recreation
>>2667855
I think this concept would be better fitted to an animated film, ala Monsters Vs Aliens
>>2667768
>>2667770
>>2667772
Also, bump
>>2667930
>also, bump
I'm working on it, bud! Give me a minute
>>2667930
>>2667770
uh, different angle, do you mind?
>>2668074
I don't mind at all! Nice work on the reflection!
>>2668078
Thanks, took a lucky idea. This one is fixed, notice the crowd masking
>>2667912
>anal/danfordan, does wonderslug come here?
Confused.
wonderslug is danforddan
I'm not danforddan
Assuming "anal" is shorthand for AnAlternate
Also I've only been lurking these threads, been super busy of the last couple of days.
>>2668090
ohhhh.
And I promise I'll use AnA from now on :3
Natkatsz, he/she's the other one
People here only post skinny girls, apart from Jordan and Kelly. Time to #redefine big booty standards
>>2667881
I think it is working!
>>2667882
I think it's safe to say that Giantess City is dying a slow death by attrition (very few non-paid content producers bother posting their work regularly any more, for example). Just take a look at the Google Trends plot:
https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Giantess%20City
(Interestingly, add a plain "giantess" search term and compare it to "Giantess City". "Giantess" has been slowly increasing the whole time that "Giantess City" has been decreasing, making the decrease worse than it appears. The same is true of the "macrophilia" term. Interest in the giantess fetish has been increasing while interest in Giantess City has been decreasing.)
I think there are a whole bunch of factors contributing to this, but there's not enough room in this single post to list all the problems that Giantess City currently has. ;-P
At this point, the forums seem to be hopping along simply by critical mass. It will be interesting to see how that website looks in a few years.
>>2667887
I've still got the idea of a giantess lowering her chest onto a town/city as she gets pummeled by a volley of missiles (suggested in the last thread). I haven't found good material for it yet, but it's in the back of my mind.
>>2667911
>And I totally forgot that BFG was announced... has there been a trailer?
There have been a few BFG trailers. You might want to check YouTube.
>>2668096
Does this count as a bigger booty? :3
anybody still fulfilling requests? i think this one has some potential.
This is the pinnacle of celeb worship autismo.
>>2668183
It can certainly feel that way, though the fetish is far from limited to celebrities. I would suspect that the popularity of using celebrities in these kinds of photoshoped images is more-or-less in line with the popularity of celebrities among the general public. Plus, it helps that there is simply an over-abundance of high quality celebrity images available online to make use of.
>>2667828
Taylor will never be mega'd ;-;
>>2667912
I do some collages too, under the name "Redcoffee1".
>>2668485
hopefully
here's one of a delicious milf if anyone wants to make her into the titaness she deserves to be
>>2668396
Is this the same cosplayer?
>>2668129
>I've still got the idea of a giantess lowering her chest onto a town/city as she gets pummeled by a volley of missiles (suggested in the last thread). I haven't found good material for it yet, but it's in the back of my mind
YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS
>>2668517
Hmmm
If she wasn't looking directly at the camera...
Back to GiantessPosting
Wish I knew who this was
Another one that I kind of don't like because she kind of just appears on the horizon with no way to determine her actual size.
As far as the lowering herself on a city, there are some great descriptions in 70 Mile Jenny and another called Monica XL (which has a part two that never got finished I guess). I'd post an except but I don't have either handy right now. Perhaps later on.
At what size do you think that a giantess could be classified as absolutely invincible? Like, there is absolutely nothing short of divine intervention that could stop her?
Ending with an absolutely tiny Jordan Carver
>>2668545
probably around like 4-5 KM tall
but again
>applying science fact and conjecture to this fetish
>>2667772
Here's a quick (shitty) shop from me
>>2667828
Here is a Taylor Momsen Giantess that I just made.
She isn't mega sized yet, but these elements worked too well together to not be used.
I am working on a mega-sized one but it is not coming together as well as this one. Maybe I will finish it soon. Hopefully this is ok until then.
>>2668592
<3333333
Bigger is better, but dam, she's already awesome at that size!
>>2668545
>maidenpool
what's with the double names? Do nat and danfordan and other people prefer the ones on the DA now, or were they forced to change?
>>2668400
I've seen a few collages of her floating around. Do a search for her name on Giantess Booru (none of them are big enough to post here though). But she's a qt, more collages of her would be nice!
>>2668457
Hey hey! This is quite amusing, so many of us DA collagers seem to naturally hang out here on /hr/. I don't think any of us that I've seen have commented/posted about these threads anywhere on DA ... did everyone just naturally stumble upon these threads within the last week?
>>2668505
Nice source image, cute woman! I've definitely saved the pic ... hopefully I'll find time to work on it at some point!
>>2668517
>>2668531
>>2668533
>>2668535
>>2668538
>>2668539
None of these are quite the pose I had in mind ... but they're still pretty great! If I don't find the sort of thing I'm after, I'll probably use one of these instead.
>>2668543
I do have 70 Mile Jenny on my computer. I'm going to be going to bed shortly, so I might throw it on my tablet and have a read of it in bed to remind myself.
>>2668545
I think it's really hard to judge. How does the strength of human skin scale with size? Especially if you count nuclear weapons (I guess you do, given the "absolutely invincible" line), some of those were able to create craters on the order of hundreds of meters wide. She'd have to be REALLY big for something like this to just be shrugged off completely. Maybe soft, spongy, flexible skin would do a better job of absorbing the blast?
But I mean, at that kind of scale, she has nothing of any real nutritional value to eat, she has limited access to clean fresh water, breathing would probably be an issue ... without even getting into the physics of such a large person not collapsing by their own weight. Basically, what >>2668556 said at the end. :P
>>2668590
>>2668592
Nice work guys! :D
>>2668611
I'm not sure if that's one of Wonderslugs or not, but it can actually be a bit hard to tell. When he does request collages for people, he frequently lets them post the finished image up for themselves on their own gallery/page. So there are a wholllle bunch of Wonderslug collages spread across a whole bunch of different DA accounts/names.
I THINK he keeps his eGiantess gallery up to date. But it's a scary, scary gallery to visit if you want to find anything specific. At 8 images per page and 387 pages, he's got over 3000 collages uploaded there.
Over. Three. Thousand. Collages.
The man is a machine! A god among us mere mortals!
>>2668612
>>2668545
basically square-cube law prevents a straight scaling up of even the nervous system, but especially blood vessels, bones and muscles. But we assume that the growth process has made them super-dense and super-strong - maybe they have a healing factor.
In short, they need to be pretty invincible to even survive their own mass.
>>2668614
maidenpool redirects to Natkatsz, and danfordan is AnAlternateUsername. I like to believe these are two separate invididuals, and that this wonderslug guy is not omnipresent :O
>>2668619
>maidenpool redirects to Natkatsz
Ahh, another victim of DA's username changing function. It's really hard to keep track of everyone when they can keep changing their usernames!
But yeah, it's a good example of what I was talking about. It looks like pretty much everything on that account was made by Wonderslug, who allowed it to be posted separate from his main account.
There are a few different accounts like this, some of which post a mixture of their own work and Wonderslug's. Underfoot-Jessica is another example (gore warning!)
>danfordan is AnAlternateUsername
Danfordan is Wonderslug's account (or, *was*, before he changed the username to "the_wonderslug").
AnAlternateUsername isn't Wonderslug/Danfordan. He also goes by "PS3_has_no_games" over on Giantess Booru.
>>2668621
>Gore warning
Eh, strawberry sauce is less explicit than shaved vagina that we get on here.
>dan4dan is slug
AaaaAAAaaa
And ps3 has no games is horrible in a Google search (I tried). AnA is a better choice for findability.
Dump time - hopefully this shizz is fresh
>>2668640
>>2668641
>>2668642
>>2668643
>>2668619
Is this actually a thing? People think I'm Danforddan?
>>2668698
It's a size conspiracy! You're actually a one mile tall stacked blonde bombshell who is shitposting from your building size phone while casually stuffing tiny men into your vagoo!!
I wish this one was in higher resolution
>>2668810
The sense of scale and perspective on this one is fantastic!
Apparently the author of 70 Mile Jenny did this collage to go along with the story. I guess it gives some context.
So for the sake of discussion, maybe I'll take >>2667751's question and extend it a bit further: What's might be your ideal giantess content? A particular movie, image, game? A particular celebrity or someone you know in real life? A particular scenario? And so on.
In before "making giantesses real IRL!"
>>2669051
shes far smaller than 70 miles
>>2669069
But much more representative of the story scale. If Jenny was 70 miles tall, and I haven't finished reading it, but she could run laps around the continent like it was nothing. She could swim, no, WADE to friggin Africa. She would stand in the thermosphere, dammit! That means she can touch the aurora!
>>2669051
For me the giantess would have to be a crush. So celebrity or otherwise, there's still a separation by fantasy and here we are.
And I'm a wannabe film-maker, so movie or TV show. It's hard to imagine a game working without VR.
Based Wonderslug making more Sophie Turner collages. My lucky day!
>>2669245
Right. 70 miles is 10km past the internally agreed upon boundary of space.
>>2669277
>>2669308
Sophie looking like Deborah Ann Woll here. Any DAW collages?
>>2669417
Based Wonderslug to the rescue once again.
not enough activity in here
>>2669823
I've been busy with a bunch of other stuff at the moment, so my activity has died down a bit. Hoping to get back to collaging later this week.
>>2669823
You're at the beach and this girl slaps your city's ass.
What do?
>>2669836
The only sane thing - slap her ass back!
c:
>>2669836
compliment her on her titties
>>2669840
That's the easiest way to ensure that she'll pluck you up and drop you inside the front of her bikini.
Nice!
>>2669843
Whoa this is cool, she's dug her feet underneath people on the sand, neat!
>>2669843
So where do you folks stand when it comes to imagined interaction with a giantess? Do you just like to imagine watching everything going on from some safe distance? Or do you imagine yourself in the thick of it - darting around to avoid destruction she's causing, getting picked up, being crushed or dropped inside her clothing, or whatever?
>>2670067
I like the idea of being macro myself and making her my giant gf as we as a giant couple go round committing genocide and other romantic giant stuff
>>2670070
You know, I've never really had any interest in being macro myself. I enjoy looking at the tiny buildings out the window on plane flights, and I sometimes wonder in the first person about how much force it would actually take for a giant person to actually destroy a building ... but it's always been fairly passive, not a directly-inserting-myself-into-the-fetish type thing.
But it could totally work for me. I've long had both a giantess AND shrunken woman fascination, as contradictory as that might seem (though I know I'm not alone in this). But I've always thought of the two scenarios separately.
So what if I imagine myself as a giant in a city along with some giant woman? Not only do I get to watch a giantess having fun doing whatever she wants (in relative safety, and with the probability that her destruction is partly a show FOR me), but I also have an entire city of tiny women to collect and play with.
You may have started me down a long rabbit hole, anon!
>>2670135
well, enjoy.
Its one small step from this fetish, into committing genocide
I expect
So you guys probably loved the new Gods of Egypt movie huh?
>>2670210
Didn't watch.
>>2670197
Low energy!
Love it though
Pls don't die on us, based thread!
What'll it take to kick these threads back up a notch?
Seattle.
>>2670696
The weekend. Or holidays. Or new artists :(
>>2670696
when new material gets posted
So we've got a few collagers here ... maybe I could propose some sort of loose collaborative work?
We could all decide upon an image set of some celebrity/woman we like, come up with a vague scenario description (her size, what's she's doing, etc), then each select one image from that set to create a collage of that scenario.
If we're super organised, maybe we could even come up with some sort of coherent story to play out through each collage, so the end result is a coherent collage/comic narrative?
Thoughts? Suggestions for photo sets we might use?
>>2671237
I like it man, that's a yes from me. So how do you organise things on an anonymous Japanese anime board?
>>2671348
I guess we can throw out some ideas for image sets and scenarios we might like, and then just go with the a general group decision. We could even do a simple strawpoll to decide once we have enough options on the table.
Afterwards I'm sure we can just casually divvy up the images and work towards the scenario/story without needing too much group involvement. As long as we know which images have already been taken (and maybe which parts of the "story" have been taken, if we decide to go that route), there shouldn't be any problems.
When we're finished, we can just upload the collages to whatever website we like, and also link to the other entries. Most of us have a DA account, so it's easy enough to just link to the other collages in the image description as they're uploaded. A good chance for some cross promotion?
>>2667727
PS3 HAS NO GAMES
>>2671356
I'm down. And nice blending!
>>2671356
Also I want to point out that recurring Swift/Kloss/Gillan thing AnA and doc (you?) have been colluding on.
Is it something you've discussed aloud?
>>2671559
Nice. I might link a few image sets later this evening to start getting some creative juices flowing!
>>2671563
Haha yeah, the Officer Gillan stuff. :P
Alt started it a few years ago (almost 2 years to the day, in fact) with pic related. He then made another collage a short while later that also included Officer Gillan, and it grew from there. Some point after we made our first collab collage (>>2671000) ... I can't remember if it was me or Alt who chose to add her in (though I remember it was me who added the giant handcuffs :3) And it has just been a bit of a running gag ever since.
I think we both just like Karen Gillan, and women in uniforms. c:
Another example of me jumping in on Alt's fun: >>2670899 was my attempt at doing a follow-up/sequel type collage to Alt's pic related.
Like I've said before, I'm a bit of a fanboy. :P
And for kicks, because I was fairly impressed at this announcement, Barely Noticed (the owner of the Giantess Love website) has stated that he's going to be releasing a new collage *every day* for the next year. Apparently he's already built up enough of a back log for the next two months.
The guy does good work, and has a good track record ... though I'm a teensy bit curious about how the quality/quantity ratio will work out on the long term. Regardless, it looks like his gallery will be worth a regular look!
https://giantesslove.com/barely-noticed/artwork/
I promised myself I wouldn't make collages unless I had free time... Mistakes were made
I barely make collages (im the fag who made the jessica kylie post 2 threads ago) but I just finished this. Im pleased with it. Hopefully someone else likes it too
>>2671733
Paris, right? I'm not used to seeing it with blue skies. And not that scene would be underwater.
Of course, great collage! Love the blending of the feet. I think the pose is angled slightly too far forward and could do with some use of curves but I mustn't nitpick :P
>>2671743
don't know! as far as curves while im entirely open to advice and opinion i am a pleb and have no idea what youre talking about
what does that do/how do i doit? I'm using GIMP if thats any help
>>2671743
Actually it doesn't look like Paris for a reason. Woops.
>>2671746
I am pleb too, I just like to fiddle with the tools in the Colors tab. Levels and curves play with the black point and the white point, meaning it squeezes the whole colour palette of the picture in between I think. But obviously it gives you a lot more control than that.
>>2671748
It is Paris en été, moral of the story is never doubt yourselves/always believe in the heart
>>2672061
this is great and retarded at the same time
sort of a microcosm of the fetish as whole
nice work
Quick question: what happend to RMB (rmb1701d)?
>>2672178
They were good, and now the DA page is dead :(
Anyone here aware of why?
Doesn't even have a flickr :(
Just like that RMB was deleted, silenced, gone. Least the photos weren't locked
Posting danefu
That was the only one I had, danefu is rare :(
Here's a debigulator, someone I haven't seen posted to the threads
>>2672178
>>2672189
It's always hard to know. Sometimes DA just jumps the gun and takes down entire gallies, sometimes the person just leaves of their own free will and deletes all their work on the way out.
DA is a fickle place. There's not much you can do except hope the next gallery wipe isn't your own.
D E D
E
D
C'mon, it's nearly the weekend
I'd like to post, but it looks like basically everything I have is too low res for /hr/.
Any anon got a solution? I have tons of collages.
>>2672857
http://waifu2x.udp.jp/
http://waifu2x.booru.pics/
its meant for drawings and such but I had pretty good success with one of my favorite collages
i haven't tested just how well it works with photos versus drawings, and the picture I enlarged was already sort of blurry, so who knows.
Play around with it
>>2672862
here's the original for comparison (I can't post because of size limitations)
http://giantessbooru.com/post/view/117364?search=nude%20mega%20collage
>>2672857
I manually resize in Gimp/PS, not ideal but it works
Since AnAlternate is taking a break I thought I'd try a collage. Not final final
>>2671649
Nice use of both these two images! I like the expression too, looks like she's not too impressed by him, and is about to pluck him off the wall!
>>2671733
Looks nice! I definitely think the cropping is a big improvement over the first version you showed me. I think it's worth putting the extra bit of time/practice into getting the cropping looking good. :D
>>2672709
Sorry guys, I should be doing my part to help keep the thread alive. Been busy with work through the week (still no excuse to not post a few random collages in the evening), so I haven't done much collaging. I'll attach a work in progress of something I started doodling with while watching the most recent episode of Game of Thrones though. It's not something from the request pile, but, eh, hopefully it's fun regardless. I want to add an Emilia Clarke to the very back right background, but haven't found the right image yet. :P
Also, videoanon who was emailing me clips a few weeks ago, sorry, I totally forgot about your most recent email! Basically I opened it and downloaded the clips at the time, but didn't play around with them at all in order to email you with some suggestions/appraisals ... then promptly forgot about it during travel. I'll try to take a look and write a reply email with my thoughts tomorrow.
On that note, I've spend pretty much all of today messing around with new rotoscoping techniques in After Effects/Mocha. Some very neat functionality in Mocha, once you get used to it. And I've basically rotoscoped three clips from the testing alone (unfortunately for this thread, they're all clips for SW animated collages!) But perhaps it will mean I'll be willing to tackle some more ambitious giantess stuff in the near future?
>>2672993
Nice work! I wish something like this had happened on any of my camping trips!
Can I chuck a request on the pile? Someone wanna do something with this pic? Would be much appreciated.
>>2673256
I gave it the old collage try (Hehe), but the fact of the matter is:
Her skin is very close to the background in terms of color and lighting.
I do not own Photoshop.
This is the first collage I've ever made.
So it's not the best, but bear with me, okay?
>>2673151
Oh damn, great use of Maisie! All your images look so high quality
>>2673151
I wish had the GPU to do AE stuff without going insane
>>2673471
I'm the same anon who made this.
If anyone has tips on how to improve, I'd love to hear them. I want to be able to contribute some OC.
>>2673471
You're deluded man, this is awesome! ;)
I always wonder if there should be a rejection or not, like how do you work that out even?
>>2673577
A rejection? Not sure what you mean.
If anyone has any more requests, I need the practice.
>>2673471
That's a really nice first collage! But more importantly, it seems like you're already well versed at bad collager puns. I see a bright future ahead of you! :D
>>2673568
Thanks! Still got a fair bit of work before it's done, I've got some ideas for some destruction.
>>2673571
I'm not sure AE really has a huge requirement for a strong GPU. My computer surely has a crap GPU (a 1GB NCIDIA GT 750M). A good GPU helps speed up some processes, but otherwise I think having a reasonable amount of RAM (I have 16G) and a good CPU is more important.
But I dunno. Have you tried running it on your system to see how it gets on? I can't quite tell from your comment whether you mean you've tried it already or not.
>>2673572
For the moment, I'd make two broad suggestions.
You touched on the first one yourself, the lighting in the picture of the girl isn't very great to work with. It'll always be hard to find a background city image with lighting that matches it, so it's always going to be hard to realistically integrate the woman into the background. But as a general rule, my first big "how to make better collages" tip is to spend the time making sure your images have matching lighting/perspective/etc.
(Of course, my Maisie image above doesn't have lighting that matches perfectly. It's a "do as I say", not "do as I do". :P)
The second thing is that you could always improve your cropping around the woman. It's a little scratchy in places, and you can see some of the white from the background. Using the polygonal lasso tool or pen tool (or whatever your program's equivalent is?) with layer masks seems to be the cleanest way to do this for most parts of the body. Hair is already a really annoying/difficult part to learn to cut out well ... so while you're starting off, I'd suggest you stick with images with very simple hair.
But like I said above, it's not a bad first collage!
>>2673151
Something I forgot to mention in this post yesterday: the GIMP semi-tutorial video I was going to make based on my recent Taylor Swift collage. My screen recording program just cracks the shit whenever I try to record anything in GIMP. I'm not sure at all why, it seems to be limited entirely to GIMP (I can record just fine in Photoshop). Not only that, but I tried a few alternative screen recording programs and the same problems occurred. It doesn't make much sense to me why it's not working, presumably it has something to do specifically with how GIMP draws to the screen? Anyway, that puts the video on hold for a little bit - I still want to make it (in trying to get the screen recorder working, I've recorded the first half of the video about 6 times now!), but i'm not having any luck with my current setup. Maybe I'll try on a different PC at some point.
>>2673610
Thanks for the heads up.
I'm going to get GIMP so I have some more refined tools to work with.
I appreciate it. Know any good tutorials I can try and glean some more information I can use?
>Thread is dead
>Collage fags are dead
>Request image drop box is dead
>my mega/giga Taylor Momsen request is dead
Such is the fate of this fetish
>>2673774
When you say giga, gimme a sense of scale. I might do it. What object is comparable to how big you want her?
>>2673790
Reflection? Haha. Still no clue what you mean. Can you elaborate?
>>2673610
Yes, I have used AE on my sandy bridge i5, 4gb of RAM laptop, and just mocha tracking is a pain, let alone rendering previews. And since rotoscoping needs full resolution, proxy footage cant help me there.
>>2673791
I meant in the water ;P
She's visible above the buildings, but only the buildings are reflected. Now, should we expect to see her reflection mixed in the water, or is she far enough away that she is obscured?
>>2673793
Oh. I didn't even consider that.
I'll think about that when I make more.
>>2673471
Thanks for fulfilling my request, it looks great, especially for a first collage!
>>2673804
Just out of curiosity, who is she? I like her.
>>2673805
I'm an idiot. Haha. The name of the photographer is right there.
>>2673796
>more
:D
Request for either of these at any size, thanks!
>>2673832
Quick shop I did in less than 10 minutes, don't hold it by any standards.
>>2673789
like 15-20 miles
this is some retarded fucking shit
>>2674611
Uh, what is?
>>2674557
Sure make them whenever works with you
>>2674611
just like you!
>>2674573
Didn't have as much free time as I wanted, haven't tried Giga-Momsen yet
>>2673610
Love the Godzilla scale
>>2673613
Holy moley teach me senpai :'0
>>2674682
I am really looking forward too it!
She is just a great model for meda and giga
>>2674611
Heh, yeah, it's pretty silly. But that's "fetish" for you, they frequently don't make much sense from the outside.
Heya, just did another quickie
this thread is a perfect analogy of this fetish
short and brief flurries of creation, followed by vast eons of stagnation and hibernation
>>2675196
How is that an analogy, and not just a straight description of a small online community?
Though I share your disappointment, I am more frustrated by my own lack of creativity
>>2675196
What >>2675202 said. I'm not sure I understand how that's an analogy of the fetish?
I think these threads have been pretty positive, even if they're slowing down a bit We've had a reasonable amount of OC (more than is generated in the average /hr/ thread, or even in the average size thread over on /d/ or /aco/), and we've seemingly encouraged a few folks to start creating collages too. Plus we've had a bit of networking, we've tried out a few different ways of making requests. And if I wasn't a lazy sod, I'd actually get around to searching for a few image sets we could use to work on the collaboration idea from >>2671356. :^)
I don't mean to sound like an asshole, but what exactly is the appeal of this fetish? I can understand other fetishes but this one always confused me.
>>2675245
Inverted power fantasies, memories of being a small child and fascinated with adult women, godzilla fans, or simply people who think bigger is always better ;)
>>2675245
No worries, it's a common question, and one that's fair enough to ask! It seems to be a bit of a combination of things, different people seem to like it for different reasons.
In general, I guess it's just an extreme version of power fantasies. If you're into being dominated by a woman ... well, what if that woman was so overpowering that she could easily crush you under her foot/finger? What if you were so insignificant to her that she could easily just drop you into her underwear and forget about you completely? Or to put it on a more active sexual role, a woman who could just scoop you up and use your entire body as a living dildo? These sorts of extreme domination scenarios seem to be the most popular in the fetish.
On the reverse, there is also the loving/nurturing side of things. It's pretty easy to imagine these kinds of scenario where such a size difference would make it easy for a woman to shower a bit of extra love onto a guy. A woman only a few times your height could easily bundle you up and snuggle with you like a teddy bear at night. You could be cared for lovingly as a tiny pet and live a fairly cushy lifestyle inside her giant house. Things of that nature.
Then there is the simple "more of something I like" cases. Already have a foot fetish? Well what if you were to imagine a foot so large that you could crawl all over it, wedge yourself between the toes, take a nap on the sole? What about boobs you could use as a beanbag? Surely a giant woman is like the ultimate straight man's jungle gym?
And there is also just a visceral/visual side of things. This fetish has the ability to produce all sorts of -literal- destruction porn. Imagine all the impressive CGI destruction sequences we've been seeing in super hero movies these last few years ... then imagine they're being caused by a super sexy woman. Yeah.
And there's a lot more, but I guess this gives a few different angles from which people seem to approach the fetish.
>>2675245
It's pretty all encompassing when you consider everything.
Into being Dominated? Giant woman dominatrix!
Into feet? Giant feet!
Into vore? Now it's physically possible!
And so on and so forth. I can't really speak for other anons, but Giantess just works so perfectly with domination, destruction....and other stuff I'm into that doesn't necessarily need to be said.
It's like an umbrella, I guess. Or maybe, you know, some people just like giant women. It just happens for no reason. I don't understand people into diapers, but they exist, and they probably don't understand it either, so I think that approach works well to any sexual deviancy such as this.
Different Creator from other anons
Been lurking this thread for a few weeks
Got inspired by meta-talk about the community
Will likely join in the shenanigans
I used gimp
I took one digital art class in uni
Probably wont be adding broken buildings or other effects, just some simple layering.
>>2675298
Welcome aboard! Great to have another creator on board! And it's always nice to see a gigantic Lauren Cohan. ;D
Are you new to the giantess fetish in general? Or just to creating/posting in these particular threads?
>>2675300
I was briefly introduced into gigantism from videos on PH. (Vore?) this branched from pov lens kissing which is similar. Maybe a month ago.
But as for this particular kind, I've never seen before. I really like the idea, although as for the content in this thread I prefer the "A" list Hollywood celebrities rather than anonymous (to my knowledge) women.
I'll be back with more content tomorrow!
>>2674794
Paging Momsen anon
Wishing I knew what I was doing :P
>>2675317
Nice!
Are you aware of the other regular giantess haunts online? If not, I'll post some suggestions here.
Most of the collagers in the community post their stuff over on DeviantArt. Some noteworthy examples include e10gts, analternateusername, the-wonderslug, nikemd, jrgts, accasbel, beregous, and many others. These are excellent starting points, and looking through their "favourites" lists is a good way to branching out from there. A bunch of us here also have DeviantArt accounts - but I can't remember all of us who are here, so I won't try to list us on the worry that I'll accidently leave somebody out!
Other than individual user pages, the main websites are the Giantess City forum (the biggest forum in the community - not a huge hub for collages anymore, but still a fair bit going on, good to give you an idea of the wider community), Giantess Booru (just an image aggregator, probably the biggest collection of giantess images on the internet), and Giantess Love (a new website, kind of a mix between a forum and a Giantess Booru type site ... though at the time of writing, the front page is plastered with giant male content, which you might not be interested in). If you're interested in written fetish material, Giantess World seems to be the go to site.
I think this covers most of the larger sites. Otherwise, you can find giantess content (and smaller communties) all over the place - there are regular threads on /d/ and /aco, there are a few slow moving subreddits, there's mixed content on YouTube, tumblr, etc.
>>2675334
you have omitted flickr - significant material is posted there don't forget :(
>>2675338
My bad, it has been a little while since I've used flickr for giantess content, so it has slipped my mind! Any recommendations for artists/pages we might want to check out?
>>2675348
At the end of the day, it is pretty simple. It's just "take girl, make her larger". All the many branches and interpretations of the fetish just spring off from that premise based on personal taste - is the giant woman nice, is she mean, is she going to do sexual stuff, etc.
Interestingly, we've recently seen the growth of the so-called "G/t" (standing for Giant/tiny) community. These are folks who are interested in size stuff, but not in any sexual or fetishistic manner. Obviously there's a fair bit of crossover, though they seem to be fairly distinct. They seem to basically be "like size fetish, but without the fetish". I think a lot of us are still a little unsure what to make of it all. :P
But, yeah, there's a lot of diversity for such a simple concept.
Another seen on flickr, account "vogelfd1"
>>2675388
flickr find - "lovethegiantess"
>>2675391
flickr find - "mega-75"
The thing with these is they're all 8-9 years old, wonder what sparked the fetish then. Possibly the emergence of VFX gts video makers?
>>2675395
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
p.s. thx >>2672862
for this tool, that's how I'm sharing these :)
>>2675398
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
er... would one's johnson survive this experience? i suppose she could be just blowing raspberries
>>2675400
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
>>2675395
There has been a pretty healthy collaging scene in the size community for welllll over a decade now. Even the CS/CS2 versions of Photoshop from 2003/2005 are basically feature complete in terms of the main tools most people use in collages.
Computer power and internet speed for downloading source material, on the other hand ... :P
It will be interesting to see where things go from here though. 3D renders/animation is massively on the rise, and a few of us are branching out a bit more into this "animated collage" hybrid between collages and video VFX. I guess VR is the new "next big thing"?
>>2675400
I'm sure quite a few members of the community would be willing to volunteer to find out!
>>2675401
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
>>2675403
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
>>2675402
True. I remember discovering *this* back then, I think. Or maybe I was born this way!
>>2675405
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
>>2675406
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
realising my pseudo-citing is gonna rub someone as obnoxious, sorry in advance ;)
>>2673151
videoanon here. I haven't been in this thread much, been busy with other stuff going on and don't have much hr material that hasn't been posted the last couple threads. I've tried working on a couple of the clips, but not much progress as of yet.
>>2673613
Is a non-video tutorial out of the question? I personally prefer text and pictures to video tutorials, but I'm for the cause either way.
>>2675149
This inspired me to make pic related. Might work on it more in the future. I'm guessing we've all seen those kpop vr videos on youtube?
>>2675388
I love the perspective on this, she really has a towering presence.
>>2675410
flickr find - "Accasbel"
>>2675443
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
>>2675445
flickr find - "Accasbel"
>>2675449
flickr find - "vogelfd1"
Rare snow collage (!)
>>2675458
>>2675467
Not sure who the artist of this one is, afterthevoid sound familiar?
>>2675471
hashtag ded thred
>>2675475
bump if you love big girls
