Capitalist.
>Capitalist.
No such thing.
Cadet.
Bolshevik and menshevik.
Bourgeoisie.
Worker.
Anarchist.
Bundist.
These are pre soviet?
Social-democrat.
Social-revolutioner.
Moderate.
>>978811
Yeah.
>>978827
The tsar seem to have been a bit laxer at enforcing cencorship than the Soviets.
These would make pretty deccent reaction images to be quite honest.
>tfw no anime set in revolutionary Russia
How badly was the author of these executed after 1917?
>>980672
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD,_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%90%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87
>>980693
Huh. I guess the Bolshevik drawing wasn't that bad.
Cheers.
>>981192
A Cadet is a supporter of the Constitutional Democratic Party, a right-liberal party that supported constitutional monarchy and was prominent in the Transitional Government.
>>978786
Menshevik?
>>981227
Mensheviks were basically the pinko faction of the communist party. Bolsheviks meant "majorityists" while mensheviks were "minorityists" (though Bolsheviks sometimes were in the minority)
>>981192
Don't anarchists belong to no group?
>>981227
Mensheviks were ortho-marxists in a sense, since they wanted to follow his historical doctrine of development that said a nation goes through several stages.
primitive communism -> slave-owners society -> feudalism -> capitalism ->communism
So they wanted Russia to first transition into a capitalist state (Russia was still largely feudal in 19o7) and then transition pecefully into communism through reforms, etc.
Bolsheviks just said fuck it we'll go directly from feudalism to communism.
>>978771
capitalist
>>978771
The American lifestyle
The Hollywood conveyor belt
yuri
>>982795
Forbidden love!
>>982766
Me on the upper right.
>>982795
Whoever fights against the purest love known to man forsakes humanity!
The wrong side won I guess.
>>982861
>>982875
kek
I'm going to fuck off now.
I wish I could read Russian.
>>982732
another capitalist
[spoiler]he also committed suicide, just not in 1929[/spoiler]
>>982899
Did the soviets take this sentiment anywhere beyond anti-america propoganda?
>>982952
rip mrs bendy
>>983050
What sentiment?
>>983053
No state sponsored persecution and second classism based on race.
>>983059
Well the USSR was pretty friendly to black people and African countries. Though the common people weren't particularly on board.
>>983063
>Though the common people weren't particularly on board.
How so if you can think of anything illustrating this?
>>982921
at least kingship did crash everywhere in XX century. Literally Lenin-Trotsky same as Maximilien Robespierre.
>>982761
And You Are Lynching Blacks
>>983069
>>982761
In soviet russia, you rob blacks
>>983123
A little too modern
>>981192
It's okay the same happens to the right
Ahh bipartisan politics are swell aren't they?
PACT POSTING
>>982782
What does it say?
>>982782
I think it says "3 o clock", "7 o clock", "1 o clock".
>>978842
>>982821
>dat nose
>>981245
They're considered part of the left, traditionally. Though there have been pushes from subsets of them (namely anarcho-capitalists and post-left anarchists) to detach themselves from it. Though other anarchists like to argue those aren't actually anarchists (particularly in regards to anarcho-capitalists).
>>981205
ty
>>981245
true, political system and organisation of society is more important than left/right. Anarchists' difference with any other ideology is the absence of state, which is a fundamental trait. Sure, there are common areas with leftish ideas but in the political spectrum anarchism is out of any side.
>>981261
the anarchist with the bomb also
>>982734
kek
>>982759
TU QUOQUE
U
Q
U
O
Q
U
E
>>986734
>TU QUOQUE
That's not an appeal to hypocrisy it's a legitimate point regarding the differing degrees of harm each system can, and has, inflicted.
>>986738
it is tu quoque you memer
>"oh people who criticise me do bad things so I can't be wrong"
>>986739
The picture didn't imply capitalism isn't wrong.
>>986739
It's not claiming that Capitalism is not in the wrong, merely that it is better than the other systems.
In other words the comic is not exonerating Capitalism, it is merely pointing out that the other systems have done worse.
>>986757
>but it's obviously implying that it's a necessary evil
No?
>>982686
Pffff.
Capitalism can be combined with landlordship, like in Britain and German Empire.
Russian Empire was pretty capitalist to the end of 19 century
>>980664
I wish there would be a steampunk or dieselpunk mecha show about Civil War and Revolution
>>986762
what kind of court wouldn't convict you after admitting you did something bad if it wasn't deemed necessary?
>>981261
Social-Revolutionaires are not commies, they are non-marxist socialists
>>983362
The passengers of all kinds - people and "the servant of people"
Three (bus #3 is overloaded), 7 (bus #7 is overloaded), ace (official in his limo) - reference to Pushkin's Queen of Spades
>>986739
>>986757
>>986769
Dude. You can't compare capitalism to "nothing". You need to have two actual options to compare if you want to compare options.
So let's do that now, shall we.
Capitalism > Feudalism.
Capitalism > Socialism
Capitalism > Communism
Oh, gee, would you look at that! It seems like the comic was not wrong!
Like, while it is true that capitalism has had some shitty side-effects, (which is said in the comic) those side-effects are much less bad than all the shit which is the other options.
>>986787
>Dude. You can't compare capitalism to "nothing".
>Like, while it is true that capitalism has had some shitty side-effects
you're an idiot
>>986795
and you're BTFO.
