If we were hypothetically in a world where nothing has ever been said that was untrue then a man comes up to you and claims, "Not everything that says is true."
How could you debate this?
My brother said, "He's right either way, why try?"
>>895632
>what is liar's paradox
>>895632
Trick question. The answer is you wouldn't understand him, because you've never experienced a lie. Without the concepts of lies and inaccurate statements you have no concept of true statements, either. Therefore you couldn't debate because the man's talking gibberish.
TLDR; Wittgenstein
>average philosophy major
What would that imply? What would such a world look like?
