Is this accurate?
Who else is there to add?
>>866484
>"""""""""""philosophers"""""""""""" chart
This is most accurate chart I believe.
>>866501
Why are Marxism and Communism separate?
>>866501
>ISTP
>Corporatism
>>866501
INTP
>Stirner
INTJ
>Rand
Yea I can see that.
>>866535
>INTJ
>Rand
How?
An INTJ would more likely than not be a Hume-like skeptic
It's the logical conclusion
>>866544
Fair enough, I was thinking more of the edgy ones.
>>866544
The very fact that you're asking that indicates that you haven't read anything by Ayn Rand, or that you don't understand MBTI.
Ayn Rand herself was an INTJ, and her writings, and way of thinking, are very obviously INTJ in style and manner.
>>866565
>Ayn Rand herself was an INTJ
Eh, women can only defy their nature so much
>and her writings, and way of thinking, are very obviously INTJ in style and manner.
Ah like deriving "ethics" from nowhere, dogmatic adherence to aristotle's notions of causality, and ignoring the irrational tendencies which are just as much a part of humanity as reason is
>>866544
You can spot INTJ by strong autistic impression. Descartes and Kant are good examples. So the main question here how autistic was Rand.
I'm INTJ monarchist.
>>866578
>You can spot INTJ by strong autistic impression.
Not really.
>Descartes and Kant are good examples. So the main question here how autistic was Rand.
Descartes, and Kant, were most probably INTP, not INTJ.
>>866584
You right. Sorry, I fucked up the notation. INTP are autistic ones. I mainly use socionics because how many handy materials there is. I always forget that Rationality translates into Perceiving which is a bit counter intuitive.
