who are some good modern philosophers /his/? im talking like 1950s and onwards
>>787713
Quentin Meillassoux
Peter Sloterdijk
>>787713
The only one you ever really need to listen to. Take the Black Pill.
*sniff*
>>787761
>Peter Sloterdijk
lol...try Chalmers, Nagel, Putnam. Much better.
>>787713
Slavoj Zizek
Foucalt
Bertrand Russell technically counts
>>788951
I've read all of those, but Sloterdijk is still a very worthwhile philosopher, not sure why you're so dismissive of him.
>>787713
Mao the Dong
Not really considered tru philosophers but still enlightening
Gurdjieff
Robert Anton Wilson
Learry
>>787761
> putting Sloterdijk in with the ramblings of some controlled opposition anglo
fuck right off
>posting names without a brief summary for why he's relevant
You guys are lazy af
>>789016
>a brief summary for why he's relevant
Okay he went from rural peasant who would have spent his entire life shovel shit to the god-emperor of mankind (or just China)
And also he managed to defeat or outlast his foes who had numerical, logistical, technological, or political advantages over him.
![brandom[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Mny2zf5.jpg "brandom[1].jpg")
>>787713
Deleuze, Sellars, McDowell, Brandom, Latour, Quine, Kripke, Parfit, Negri, Stiegler, Badiou, Bernard Williams
If you want to be really up-to-date, there are people like Edward Sosa, Duncan Pritchard, Tyler Burge, Huw Price, John Hawthorne, Hilary Kornblith, etc. who are highly-cited but have little to no name recognition outside philosophy.
Alasdair MacIntyre
Jiddu krishnamurti
Evola. He shows why our modern society is shit and guides us to inner liberation.
>>788951
Nagel is so much fun
>>789000
>Meillassoux
>controlled opposition anglo
What the fuck are you on about?
>>789025
That's very impressive, but Mao was a shit tier philosopher, if he could even be considered one.
>>787713
>Philosophy
>Modern
Modernity is the anti-philosophical age per excellence
>Muh senses
>Muh feelings
>Muh equality
>>791572
>he's a positivist
>>787713
Depends what field of philosophy interests you. I'm assuming morality and sociopolitical.
Robert Nozick, Robert Wolff, Nagel, Butler, Rawls, Dworkin, Okin, Habib
>>787713
>1950s onward
>Modern
You don't know what "modern" means.
>>787713
Richard Dawkins.
>>791551
Communist theory branches into philosophy as well.
>>787713
Roger Scruton is an extremely good writer with academic credentials in philosophy and law. His book Fools, Frauds and Firebrands is a great one-volume introduction to various important twentieth-century intellectuals like Sartre, Lacan, Gramsci, Foucault, Luckacs and Zizek.
>>787768
Why the fuck do you keep advertising this out of shape sack of shit? All he does is make lame youtube videos and rant about how much his life sucks.
>>791572
Analytic philosophy has remained relatively free of that stuff. Or you can avoid it quite happily
>>791802
So? How does that refute anything I said?
;V
Stefan Molyneux
>>788968
I study philosophy at a German University; every Prof I've ever had said he's a clown, a wanna-be Nietzsche. Contributes nothing of value for philosphy-
Robert Nozick
>>787713
Said Nursi
He made Turkey great again
Also made a cosmological argument using occasionalism
>>787713
Elizabeth Anscombe
Philippa Foot
Michael Thompson
