Thoughts?
>>86094
>>86115
>>86094
A dramatic oversimplification, at least as applies to the west. Today western historiographers are virtually obsessed with portraying perspectives of the 'opressed', the 'marginalized', the 'losers' in history often to the detriment of actual historical truth. And further back than that think about all the early historians of imperial Rome who were nostalgists for the Republic. I don't know enough about Eastern historiography to even begin to make a judgement about it. Personally my favorite Churchill /his/tory quote has to be:
"Only history can judge me, but I will be one of the historians."
>>86094
i disagree, historical records and archeology has been very useful to see what actually happened in history.
>>90787
its not far enough in history i guess. also the jews are blocking any science and freedom of speech that is about the holocaust. its a shitstain on academic freedom really.
>>86094
Not so true anymore considering how easy it is to share information. Still has some truth to it though
>>86094
Only really applies to relatively recent events whose echoes are still important in today's ideologies. We can look at the distant past with a decent level of objectivity (i guess)
>>86115
heeheee
>>86094
>Thoughts?
demonstrably untrue
>>90787
>>91035
>>91040
>>91057
>>86094
Big phat phoney
>>91068
Best infographic I've seen in a while. Holocaust deniers BTFO.
