I'm gonna dump my images folder. I don't know where most of these are from, so let's make it a game. Provide some context!
Pretty sure this is the car JFK was shot in
Those 50's were great, right?
presenting the greatist air vehicles ever conceived
>>61316
Your pic is a Polish soldier during WW1.
It's probably Polnische Wehrmacht under A-H. They were quite based, rekt the Russkies for the Emperor and weren't afraid of anything.
I hear tell this is from Nanking
Hiroshima I think
>>61423
>>61424
thanks bros
>>61440
Click on ▶ next to post number then "Image search »" > Google
>>61466
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Bzura
>>61465
Well I'll be a son of a gun. This is just a regular image dump then.
lol hitler
wright brothers first flight
construction of the hindenberg
>>61648
Huh?
>>61427
It's also fake as fuck
>>61648
UKKK
It's actually Canada, which at the time was still apart of the British Empire.
>>61677
source?
that's it for now. feel free to contribute.
>>61574
Attempted Nixon assassination?
>>61695
common sense, and the fact that most of these photos that mysteriously appeared out of China have no known source.
Whatever the Japanese army was or was not doing, it probably didn't make it a point of photographing war crimes.
Bayonetting babies is something that the English often accused the Germans of doing in WWI, except the didn't doctor photos.
>>61816
so you're speculating in this case?
>>61764
>Nixon
Reagan.
>>61401
>>61342
>>61822
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf
Somewhere in chapter two he shows the original photos and the photos doctored by Iris Chang, or used by Chang for the book The Rape of Nanking. Nearly every photo of the atrocity is either fake, because they have the original photo, or fake because the uniforms and equipment is wrong.
Seriously people, you have a brain. Fucking use it. You'd think in an age where most 17 year old can use photoshop, and learn about how Stalin doctored his photos, you might raise an eyebrow when you see photos of "bad" guys smiling with babies on bayonets and headless bodies.
Granted that photo isn't discussed, mainly because that photo hasn't been around very long. Which is odd, you'd think a photo like that would have been in all the newspapers. Strange.....
>>61827
I always get those two mixed up, for whatever reason.
The assassinations, I mean. Pretty fucking hard to mix Nixon with anyone.
>>61554
Shoop?
>>61614
Some trivia: These were balloons used by the russians in WW2 which were put up around the cities in order to prevent german fighter jets from flying close to the ground and fucking up civlians.
>>62091
no, just a fake.
>>62127
It helped a lot.
>>62224
Did it?
>>61365
that's the 30s, in the middle of the Great Depression.
please be trolling.
>>61365
1937, printed c. 1970
In January 1937, the swollen banks of the Ohio River flooded Louisville, Kentucky, and its surrounding areas. With one hour’s notice, photojournalist Margaret Bourke-White caught the next plane to Louisville. She photographed the city from makeshift rafts, recording one of the largest natural disasters in American history for Life magazine, where she was a staff photographer. The Louisville Flood shows African-Americans lined up outside a flood relief agency.
