It's rightful Yugo soil, so I'd say yes.
>>582064
Croatia is rightful Venetian clay.
why?
>>582064
Is Austria Croatian colony?
>>582064
Not since the fall of the Empire. Its not hard to check such simple facts.
>>582064
I wish it was. At least then we wouldn't be a backward shithole. And in return the Austrians get access to sea.
Istria and Dalmatia belong to Italy and Slavonia belongs to Hungary. Croatia should only consist of Croatia proper.
>>583091
sure thing
>>583091
I can pull facts out of my arse too
>>583074
>implying being a colony from a succesful country avoids becoming a shithole
i guess you never visited latam or africa.
>>583177
>Croatia claiming Sandzak
>no Croats live in Sandzak
kek
>>583091
>Istria and Dalmatia belong to Italy
As an Italian this sentence pleases me
>>585313
exactly, it was for a brief time part of the
>"independent"
>"state"
of
>"croatia"
for a brief time in ww2
my point is unless you have a consistent historical majority population
(forcing your culture doesnt count) you dont have any realistic basis on claiming clay
thinking clay belongs to you just because you conquered it one time in history even though the demographics of the territory
dont consistently throughout history point at your peoples as the rightfull holders of the territory is pretty autistic
>>585457
maps like that one caused wars everywhere forever
its called a border dispute and it is usually started by edgelords claiming land for which they have no actual claims on
either than that they held control over it at one point in history (sometimes not even that though)
>>586247
inb4 i get bashed because i didnt phrase myself propperly with the "forcing cultures doesnt count" part