The transitive property states that
>if X is Y
>and Y is Z
It therefore follows that
>X is Z
The why is it that
>Peter Parker is Spiderman
>Spiderman is famous
However
>Peter Parker is not famous
Can anyone explain this?
>>489989
Spiderman = Peter Parker + public image
They aren't equal.
/his/ threads keep getting more ridiculous, what the fuck
>>489989
non-substitutability of different descriptions of the object
Peter Parker is famous as Spider Man.
>>490000
>/his/ threads keep getting more ridiculous, what the fuck
It's called philosophy.
Why don't we eat children again?
>>489994
This pretty much. Peter Parker and Spiderman do not share the same properties.
>>489994
this
Try to find a better example.
>>490170
I know what it's being called, pseudo-intellectual. It's just that "philosophy" is being used as an excuse to post increasingly ridiculous shit.
Peter Parker is not spiderman. They are two individual personas.
>>489994
Why is it that people still reply when the OP was destroyed by the first post?
>>489989
Peter Parker is famous though, just not as Peter Parker.
